In this study we explored the molecular mechanism of RdRp (Non-Structural Protein, NSP12) interaction with its co-factors NSP7 and NSP8 which is the main toolbox for RNA replication and transcription of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. The replication complex is a heterotetramer consists of one NSP12, one NSP7 and two NSP8. Extensive molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were applied on both the heterotetramer complexes to generate the conformations and were used to estimate the MMPBSA binding free energy (BFE) and per-residue energy decomposition of NSP12-NSP8 and NSP12-NSP7 and NSP7-NSP8 complexes. The BFE of SARS-CoV-2 heterotetramer complex with its corresponding partner protein was significantly higher as compared to SARS-CoV. Interface hotspot residues were predicted using different methods implemented in KFC (Knowledge-based FADA and Contracts), HotRegion and Robetta web servers. Per-residue energy decomposition analysis showed that the predicted interface hotspot residues contribute more energy towards the formation of complexes and most of the predicted hotspot residues are clustered together. However, there is a slight difference in the residue-wise energy contribution in the interface NSPs on heterotetramer viral replication complex of both coronaviruses. While the overall replication complex of SARS-CoV-2 was found to be slightly flexible as compared to SARS-CoV. This difference in terms of structural flexibility/stability and energetic characteristics of interface residues including hotspots at PPI interface in the viral replication complexes may be the reason of higher rate of RNA replication of SARS-CoV-2 as compared to SARS-CoV. Overall, the interaction profile at PPI interface such as, interface area, hotspot residues, nature of bonds and energies between NSPs, may provide valuable insights in designing of small molecules or peptide/peptidomimetic ligands which can fit into the PPI interface to disrupt the interaction.
Exploring the new therapeutic indications of known drugs for treating COVID-19, popularly known as drug repurposing, is emerging as a pragmatic approach especially owing to the mounting pressure to control the pandemic. Targeting multiple targets with a single drug by employing drug repurposing known as the polypharmacology approach may be an optimised strategy for the development of effective therapeutics. In this study, virtual screening has been carried out on seven popular SARS-CoV-2 targets (3CL pro , PL pro , RdRp (NSP12), NSP13, NSP14, NSP15, and NSP16). A total of 4015 approved drugs were screened against these targets. Four drugs namely venetoclax, tirilazad, acetyldigitoxin, and ledipasvir have been selected based on the docking score, ability to interact with four or more targets and having a reasonably good number of interactions with key residues in the targets. The MD simulations and MM-PBSA studies showed reasonable stability of protein-drug complexes and sustainability of key interactions between the drugs with their respective targets throughout the course of MD simulations. The identified four drug molecules were also compared with the known drugs namely elbasvir and nafamostat. While the study has provided a detailed account of the chosen protein-drug complexes, it has explored the nature of seven important targets of SARS-CoV-2 by evaluating the protein-drug complexation process in great detail. Graphical abstract Drug repurposing strategy against SARS-CoV2 drug targets. Computational analysis was performed to identify repurposable approved drug candidates against SARS-CoV2 using approaches such as virtual screening, molecular dynamics simulation and MM-PBSA calculations. Four drugs namely venetoclax, tirilazad, acetyldigitoxin, and ledipasvir have been selected as potential candidates. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12039-022-02046-0.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.