Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignancy of the skin. It is an epithelial neoplasm with origin in the precursor cells of the interfollicular epidermis. Even though it has low metastatic potential, delay in management may lead to local destruction and morbidity. In contrast, trichoepithelioma (TE) is a benign tumor originating from the outer root sheath of the hair follicle. Similar to BCC, TE tends to affect the head and neck region. Both neoplasms may exhibit clinical and histopathological similarities, making them prone to misdiagnosis. Multiple immunomarkers have been used to distinguish among these entities, but so far, no single agent or combination of agents appear to be neither sensitive nor specific enough to differentiate between them. This study was divided into 2 parts. First, 17 cases of BCC and 14 cases of TE were stained with androgen receptor and bcl-2. Then, 27 cases of borderline/equivocal of BCC and 13 cases of borderline/equivocal TE were stained with the same protocol. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each individual immunomarker and for the combination of them. Androgen receptor positivity was 100% specific for BCC and borderline/equivocal BCC, whereas bcl-2 diffuse staining pattern demonstrated a sensitivity of 82.4% for BCC and 88.9% borderline/equivocal BCC. When both immunomarkers were combined, the sensitivity for BCC decreased (70.6%) but the specificity remained high (100%). Similarly, the sensitivity for borderline/equivocal BCC was 55.6%, whereas the specificity was 100%. Although moderately sensitive, combining both immunomarkers showed an excellent specificity to discriminate between BCC and TE.

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common malignancy in the United States. However, metastasis of basal cell carcinoma is exceedingly rare, with incidence estimates of 0.0028–0.055%. When it does metastasize, basal cell carcinoma most commonly spreads to regional lymph nodes and lungs, although other sites of disease can occur. This case report presents multi-modality imaging of a 54-year-old male who developed multifocal metastatic basal cell carcinoma approximately three years after initial presentation with an ulcerated groin lesion. Ultimately, metastases included many common and uncommon sites, including lymph nodes, lung, duodenum, spleen, and adrenal glands. This case provides an interesting example of an uncommon pattern of spread and associated symptoms of treatment-resistant metastatic basal cell carcinoma.

No abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common genitourinary malignancy of increasing incidence and significant mortality rate. Skin metastases of RCC are considered a rare phenomenon of unfavorable outcomes. We present a 75-year-old male patient who developed a rapidly evolving lesion on his left cheek four years after undergoing a right radical nephrectomy for non-metastatic RCC. Immunohistochemistry of the skin lesion was diagnostic for cutaneous metastasis of renal clear cell carcinoma, which eventually led to the detection of internal malignancy recurrence by positron emission tomography. A new facial skin lesion may unmask the underlying recurrence of RCC.

BACKGROUND Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive neoplasm with high rates of recurrences. Current guidelines recommend wide local excision (WLE) with 1 to 2 cm margins. However, Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) offers a potential advantage over WLE because of its ability of sparing healthy tissue and assessing 100% of margins. OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the surgical modalities for the treatment of MCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible articles were identified using MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. All available studies investigating surgical treatment of MCC with WLE or MMS were considered. RESULTS Forty studies met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-one studies described patients treated with WLE, 3 with MMS, and 6 with either WLE or MMS. Subgroup analysis of Stage I MCC showed recurrence rates similar in both surgical modalities with local recurrence rate of 6.8% for WLE versus 8.5% for MMS (p 5 .64) and a regional recurrence rate of 15.2% for WLE versus 15.3% for MMS (p 5 .99). CONCLUSION Overall WLE cases were at a higher stage at presentation. Subgroup analysis showed that MMS is not inferior to WLE excision for the treatment of Stage I MCC and is a reasonable option for anatomic locations where tissue sparing is important.This review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. A primary literature search was conducted with the databases MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. We identified eligible articles from database inception to April 6, 2020. The search terms were "Merkel

No abstract

BackgroundPatch testing while taking systemic immunosuppressants is sometimes unavoidable. Methotrexate (MTX) is the immunosuppressant currently considered least likely to negatively impact patch testing.ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to characterize a cohort of patients patch tested while taking MTX.MethodsThis is a retrospective review of patients patch tested at the University of North Carolina Dermatology in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, from 2010 to 2019, comparing patch test results of patients taking MTX with those of a control group.ResultsAn overall 52.8% positivity rate (356/674) was observed. Sixty two of 674 patients were patch tested while taking MTX, with a 46.8% positivity rate (29/62) compared with 53.4% (327/612) in the control group. The control group experienced 975 reactions, including 637 1+ reactions, 291 2+ reactions, and 47 3+ reactions. The MTX group experienced 50 reactions, including thirty-two 1+ reactions, fourteen 2+ reactions, and four 3+ reactions. The difference between the distributions was not statistically significant. Mean weekly MTX dose was 15.6 mg, whereas mean total accumulated dose was 251.6 mg. There was no statistically significant difference between weekly dose and total accumulated dose in patients with positive or negative results.ConclusionsIn our cohort, MTX had no discernible effect on patch test results, supporting use during patch testing with minimal false-negative risk.

No abstract