The six-subunit origin recognition complex (ORC) binds to DNA to mark the site for the initiation of replication in eukaryotes. Here we report a 3 Å cryo-electron microscopy structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ORC bound to a 72-base-pair origin DNA sequence that contains the ARS consensus sequence (ACS) and the B1 element. The ORC encircles DNA through extensive interactions with both phosphate backbone and bases, and bends DNA at the ACS and B1 sites. Specific recognition of thymine residues in the ACS is carried out by a conserved basic amino acid motif of Orc1 in the minor groove, and by a species-specific helical insertion motif of Orc4 in the major groove. Moreover, similar insertions into major and minor grooves are also embedded in the B1 site by basic patch motifs from Orc2 and Orc5, respectively, to contact bases and to bend DNA. This work pinpoints a conserved role of ORC in modulating DNA structure to facilitate origin selection and helicase loading in eukaryotes.

INTRODUCTION It has long been an interesting question whether a living cell can be constructed from scratch in the lab, a goal that may not be realized anytime soon. Nonetheless, with advances in DNA synthesis technology, the complete genetic material of an organism can now be synthesized chemically. Hitherto, genomes of several organisms including viruses, phages, and bacteria have been designed and constructed. These synthetic genomes are able to direct all normal biological functions, capable of self-replication and production of offspring. Several years ago, a group of scientists worldwide formed an international consortium to reconstruct the genome of budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae . RATIONALE The synthetic yeast genome, designated Sc2.0, was designed according to a set of arbitrary rules, including the elimination of transposable elements and incorporation of specific DNA elements to facilitate further genome manipulation. Among the 16 S. cerevisiae chromosomes, chromosome XII is unique as one of the longest yeast chromosomes (~1 million base pairs) and additionally encodes the highly repetitive ribosomal DNA locus, which forms the well-organized nucleolus. We report on the design, construction, and characterization of chromosome XII, the physically largest chromosome in S. cerevisiae. RESULTS A 976,067–base pair linear chromosome, synXII, was designed based on the native chromosome XII sequence of S. cerevisiae , and chemically synthesized. SynXII was assembled using a two-step method involving, successive megachunk integration to produce six semisynthetic strains, followed by meiotic recombination–mediated assembly, yielding a full-length functional chromosome in S. cerevisiae. Minor growth defect “bugs” detected in synXII were caused by deletion of tRNA genes and were corrected by introducing an ectopic copy of a single tRNA gene. The ribosomal gene cluster (rDNA) on synXII was left intact during the assembly process and subsequently replaced by a modified rDNA unit. The same synthetic rDNA unit was also used to regenerate rDNA at three distinct chromosomal locations. The rDNA signature sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), often used to determine species identity by standard DNA barcoding procedures, were swapped to generate a Saccharomyces synXII strain that would be identified as S. bayanus. Remarkably, these substantial DNA changes had no detectable phenotypic consequences under various laboratory conditions. CONCLUSION The rDNA locus of synXII is highly plastic; not only can it be moved to other chromosomal loci, it can also be altered in its ITS region to masquerade as a distinct species as defined by DNA barcoding, used widely in taxonomy. The ability to perform “species morphing” reported here presumably reflects the degree of evolutionary flexibility by which these ITS regions change. However, this barcoding region is clearly not infinitely flexible, as only relatively modest intragenus base changes were tolerated. More severe intergenus differences in ITS sequence did not result in functional rDNAs, probably because of defects in rRNA processing. The ability to design, build, and debug a megabase-sized chromosome, together with the flexibility in rDNA locus position, speaks to the remarkable overall flexibility of the yeast genome. Hierarchical assembly and subsequent restructuring of synXII. SynXII was assembled in two steps: First, six semisynthetic synXII strains were built in which segments of native XII DNA were replaced with the corresponding designer sequences. Next, the semisynthetic strains were combined withmultiple rounds ofmating/sporulation, eventually generating a single strain encoding fulllength synXII.The rDNA repeats were removed, modified, and subsequently regenerated at distinct chromosomal locations for species morphing and genome restructuring.

The minichromosome maintenance complex (MCM) hexameric complex (Mcm2-7) forms the core of the eukaryotic replicative helicase. During G1 phase, two Cdt1-Mcm2-7 heptamers are loaded onto each replication origin by the origin-recognition complex (ORC) and Cdc6 to form an inactive MCM double hexamer (DH), but the detailed loading mechanism remains unclear. Here we examine the structures of the yeast MCM hexamer and Cdt1-MCM heptamer from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Both complexes form left-handed coil structures with a 10-15-Å gap between Mcm5 and Mcm2, and a central channel that is occluded by the C-terminal domain winged-helix motif of Mcm5. Cdt1 wraps around the N-terminal regions of Mcm2, Mcm6 and Mcm4 to stabilize the whole complex. The intrinsic coiled structures of the precursors provide insights into the DH formation, and suggest a spring-action model for the MCM during the initial origin melting and the subsequent DNA unwinding.

EF4 catalyzes tRNA back-translocation through an unknown mechanism. We report cryo-EM structures of Escherichia coli EF4 in post- and pretranslocational ribosomes (Post- and Pre-EF4) at 3.7- and 3.2-Å resolution, respectively. In Post-EF4, peptidyl-tRNA occupies the peptidyl (P) site, but the interaction between its CCA end and the P loop is disrupted. In Pre-EF4, the peptidyl-tRNA assumes a unique position near the aminoacyl (A) site, denoted the A site/EF4 bound (A/4) site, with a large displacement at its acceptor arm. Mutagenesis analyses suggest that a specific region in the EF4 C-terminal domain (CTD) interferes with base-pairing between the peptidyl-tRNA 3'-CCA and the P loop, whereas the EF4 CTD enhances peptidyl-tRNA interaction at the A/4 site. Therefore, EF4 induces back-translocation by disengaging the tRNA's CCA end from the peptidyl transferase center of the translating ribosome.