Free flaps have become the main alternative for intraoral reconstruction in current practice. However, controversy exists on pros and cons of different free flap options for this challenging area. Although there are various studies focusing on different free flap options, comparative studies are very few and there is not a single study comparing all 4 thin free flap options for intraoral reconstruction. Between 2018 and 2021, 30 patients underwent intraoral reconstruction. Four pliable and thin flaps, medial sural artery perforator flap, superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap, radial forearm free flap, and superthin anterolateral thigh flap were used for reconstructions and compared per functionality and patients’ quality of life. One medial sural artery perforator flap and 1 superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap failed because of perfusion problems, and the remaining flaps survived. Harvest time and donor site closure were with significant difference (P<0.05) between groups. Quality of life results were similar except one of the disease-specific questions. In authors’ opinion, anterolateral thigh flap is the best option in normal-weight individuals because of its reliability, pliability, and constant reliable vascular structure. Although other options may be considered in overweighted patients, thinly elevated anterolateral thigh flap still seems to be the most reliable option.
The authors advocate approaching all components of flap individually using the perforator concept and dissection. Good exposure is mandatory for a reliable dissection. In our opinion, the posterior approach is more useful as it reveals all vascular relationships between the bone, muscle, skin paddle, and peronel vessels.
Introduction The osteocutaneous fibula is a workhorse flap for oromandibular reconstruction. Skin paddles not only perform soft tissue reconstruction but also serve as a monitor for the fibula. In cases where the skin paddle cannot be harvested as desired due to variations, two challenges arise, such as fibula follow‐up and the need for a second free flap so recipient. Moreover, there may not be enough recipient vessels for the double flaps in the neck. This report aimed to address the difficulties mentioned above with the use of flow‐through free flaps in composite oromandibular reconstructions. Patients and Methods Between 2019 and 2021, five (three Female, two Male) patients underwent flow‐through technique as free fibula and fasciocutaneous flaps due to variations in fibular skin paddle or insufficiency of recipient vessels in the neck. Ages of patients were between 45 and 75 years. Four patients underwent surgery for tumor and one patient for the result of radionecrosis. ALT, chimeric ALT, and RFFF were selected as second free flaps. Results The size of the fasciocutaneous flaps ranged from 6 × 4 cm to 14 × 11 cm. Mandibular defects ranged from 6 to 16 cm. 1 venous occlusion occurred post‐op 1st day and was salvaged. One hematoma and one wound dehiscence occurred postoperatively and were salvaged successfully. One Partial tongue necrosis occurred due to previous radiotherapy and additional tumor surgery. No additional complication occurred. All flaps survived. Follow‐up period was between 3 months and 2 years. Patient who had tongue necrosis experienced swallowing and speech difficulty and Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube was placed post‐operative 2 months. Functional finale outcomes were successful for other patients. Conclusion Flow‐through technique provides fibula monitoring with avoiding to find second recipient. Customizing free flaps under more favorable conditions as on the operation table before fixation of the bone can be a useful approach.
Ablative surgery of mandible often necessitates combined reconstruction of the mandible and the temporomandibular joint. Fibula-free flaps with gap arthroplasty or osseochondral grafts are common procedures in the authors' practice. In search for a better reconstructive option free fibula flap is used together with a metatarsal bone flap for the vascular reconstruction of the mandibular body and the condyle at the same time. The 2 osseous-free flaps have been fused and used as a combined flow through double-free flap. The literature has been reviewed for other reconstructive options, but no alternatives providing autologous reconstruction of both the mandible and the condyle with vascular tissue have been found. This is a preliminary report of this new technique which the authors humbly think is very promising.
Aim: Subungual melanoma is a rare entity. The literature lacks information about its treatment. Alternative treatments exist; amputation or wide local excision (WLE), with or without sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). This study discusses the classical approach for subungual melanoma and compares it with the alternatives. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of subungual melanoma cases between 2008 and 2020 in a tertiary center was done. Results: Thirteen patients were found to have subungual melanoma. Amputation and SLNB were the treatment of choice in 12 patients with invasive diseases. In one patient with a in-situ illness, WLE and SLNB were applied. Mean Breslow thickness was found to be 4.2 mm. The preoperative evaluation showed no signs of metastases in 10 patients, and these patients had SLNB. Two patients had pathological lymph node characteristics in the preoperative evaluation and had elective lymph node dissection (ELND) without SLNB. The mean follow-up was six years, and seven patients died during the follow-ups. Six patients died of natural causes, while one died of systemic disease. Conclusion: Subungual melanoma is a disease that can be controlled with amputation. WLE can be used in in-situ melanomas, but amputation is still a good choice for invasive illnesses.
Developments in the microsurgery have made perforator fasciocutaneous free flaps more popular in lower extremity reconstructions. They have acceptable donor site morbidities when compared to traditional methods. However; there are some possible limitations with these flaps such as anatomical variations and insufficiency to cover large and/or complex defects with a single flap. Anterolateral thigh flap (ALT), which has proven its advantages in the reconstruction of many regions of the body, is one of the versatile perforator fasciocutaneous flap options. We present our experience of using sequential double ALTs for complex lower extremity reconstruction. A 44‐year‐old patient, who had a history of multiple traumas as a result of a traffic accident, had interconnected anterior tibial (6 × 4 cm) and bimalleolar defects (4 × 4 cm, 4 × 5 cm) in his left lower extremity. Double ALT flaps (16 × 9 cm, 17 × 10 cm) were used to reconstruct three individual defects. The posterior tibial artery was the only uninjured artery perfusing the lower extremity, so the already occluded anterior tibial artery was chosen as the recipient to avoid disturbing the posterior tibial vessels. The dominant comitant vein of one of the flaps was leaving the pedicle too early and following an aberrant path with increased diameter. As it was understood that the other comitant vein had poor drainage, it was taken as an interposition vein graft to lengthen the dominant aberrant vein. The two flaps were customized as one by flow‐through anastomoses on the operating table. The anterior tibial artery was washed and debrided distal to proximal until arterial spurting was seen. At the distance of 8 cm superior, the artery was found as feasible and anastomoses were performed. The proximal flap was inset vertically and the distal flap was inset on the horizontal axis to reach the bilateral malleolar defect. No complications were observed in both flaps. The patient was followed‐up for 8 months. Despite the successful reconstruction, the patient is still unable to walk unaided due to multiple traumas and the rehabilitation process continues. We believe that the use of sequential double ALT may be a useful alternative to reconstruct large lower extremity defects with minimal donor site morbidity when a suitable single recipient vessel is available.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.