Free flaps have become the main alternative for intraoral reconstruction in current practice. However, controversy exists on pros and cons of different free flap options for this challenging area. Although there are various studies focusing on different free flap options, comparative studies are very few and there is not a single study comparing all 4 thin free flap options for intraoral reconstruction. Between 2018 and 2021, 30 patients underwent intraoral reconstruction. Four pliable and thin flaps, medial sural artery perforator flap, superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap, radial forearm free flap, and superthin anterolateral thigh flap were used for reconstructions and compared per functionality and patients’ quality of life. One medial sural artery perforator flap and 1 superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap failed because of perfusion problems, and the remaining flaps survived. Harvest time and donor site closure were with significant difference (P<0.05) between groups. Quality of life results were similar except one of the disease-specific questions. In authors’ opinion, anterolateral thigh flap is the best option in normal-weight individuals because of its reliability, pliability, and constant reliable vascular structure. Although other options may be considered in overweighted patients, thinly elevated anterolateral thigh flap still seems to be the most reliable option.

No abstract

Ablative surgery of mandible often necessitates combined reconstruction of the mandible and the temporomandibular joint. Fibula-free flaps with gap arthroplasty or osseochondral grafts are common procedures in the authors' practice. In search for a better reconstructive option free fibula flap is used together with a metatarsal bone flap for the vascular reconstruction of the mandibular body and the condyle at the same time. The 2 osseous-free flaps have been fused and used as a combined flow through double-free flap. The literature has been reviewed for other reconstructive options, but no alternatives providing autologous reconstruction of both the mandible and the condyle with vascular tissue have been found. This is a preliminary report of this new technique which the authors humbly think is very promising.

Introduction The osteocutaneous fibula is a workhorse flap for oromandibular reconstruction. Skin paddles not only perform soft tissue reconstruction but also serve as a monitor for the fibula. In cases where the skin paddle cannot be harvested as desired due to variations, two challenges arise, such as fibula follow‐up and the need for a second free flap so recipient. Moreover, there may not be enough recipient vessels for the double flaps in the neck. This report aimed to address the difficulties mentioned above with the use of flow‐through free flaps in composite oromandibular reconstructions. Patients and Methods Between 2019 and 2021, five (three Female, two Male) patients underwent flow‐through technique as free fibula and fasciocutaneous flaps due to variations in fibular skin paddle or insufficiency of recipient vessels in the neck. Ages of patients were between 45 and 75 years. Four patients underwent surgery for tumor and one patient for the result of radionecrosis. ALT, chimeric ALT, and RFFF were selected as second free flaps. Results The size of the fasciocutaneous flaps ranged from 6 × 4 cm to 14 × 11 cm. Mandibular defects ranged from 6 to 16 cm. 1 venous occlusion occurred post‐op 1st day and was salvaged. One hematoma and one wound dehiscence occurred postoperatively and were salvaged successfully. One Partial tongue necrosis occurred due to previous radiotherapy and additional tumor surgery. No additional complication occurred. All flaps survived. Follow‐up period was between 3 months and 2 years. Patient who had tongue necrosis experienced swallowing and speech difficulty and Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube was placed post‐operative 2 months. Functional finale outcomes were successful for other patients. Conclusion Flow‐through technique provides fibula monitoring with avoiding to find second recipient. Customizing free flaps under more favorable conditions as on the operation table before fixation of the bone can be a useful approach.

The authors advocate approaching all components of flap individually using the perforator concept and dissection. Good exposure is mandatory for a reliable dissection. In our opinion, the posterior approach is more useful as it reveals all vascular relationships between the bone, muscle, skin paddle, and peronel vessels.

Aim: Subungual melanoma is a rare entity. The literature lacks information about its treatment. Alternative treatments exist; amputation or wide local excision (WLE), with or without sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). This study discusses the classical approach for subungual melanoma and compares it with the alternatives. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of subungual melanoma cases between 2008 and 2020 in a tertiary center was done. Results: Thirteen patients were found to have subungual melanoma. Amputation and SLNB were the treatment of choice in 12 patients with invasive diseases. In one patient with a in-situ illness, WLE and SLNB were applied. Mean Breslow thickness was found to be 4.2 mm. The preoperative evaluation showed no signs of metastases in 10 patients, and these patients had SLNB. Two patients had pathological lymph node characteristics in the preoperative evaluation and had elective lymph node dissection (ELND) without SLNB. The mean follow-up was six years, and seven patients died during the follow-ups. Six patients died of natural causes, while one died of systemic disease. Conclusion: Subungual melanoma is a disease that can be controlled with amputation. WLE can be used in in-situ melanomas, but amputation is still a good choice for invasive illnesses.

Background/Aim: The power of free flaps for lower extremity injury reconstruction is no longer a matter of debate; however, contrasting views remain regarding the timing of reconstruction. The mainstay article of Godina reported that reconstruction within the first three days after injury was more advantageous than surgery at later times, but different views about the best day for reconstruction have also been described in the literature. With developments in the field of microsurgery, plastic surgeons have become more experienced, shortened the times needed for surgery, and achieved flap success. We have also become more experienced with surgical times, and reconstruction on the day of injury has been performed as an emergency reconstruction (ER) procedure since 2018. However, despite the disadvantages of a delayed wait period, patients still experience delayed reconstruction (DR) due to their pre-operative conditions and dispatches from peripheral centers over delayed time periods. This study aimed to present our experiences with lower extremity reconstruction in emergency situations and after delayed periods with descriptions of technical tips for each situation. Methods: Between 2018 and 2021, patients who underwent lower extremity reconstructions were examined as retrospective case-control study. Twenty-four patients (17 male and seven female) underwent lower extremity reconstructions with microsurgical free flap coverage. Patients’ ages ranged from 6 to 75 years old. Ten patients underwent ERs (on the day of injury), and 14 patients underwent DRs. Twenty anterolateral thigh, two medial sural artery perforator, one latissimus dorsi, and one radial forearm flaps were chosen for reconstructions. Flaps were chosen for one-third of the distal lower extremity reconstructions (n=11) and Gustilo type 3B injuries (n=11), Gustilo type 3C injuries (n=1), and one-third for middle lower extremity soft tissue reconstructions (n=1). Infections, length of hospital stays, time spent during the reconstructive surgery, vascular complications, and additional debridement necessity counts were recorded and compared with previous statistical analyses. Results: One venous thrombosis in the emergency group and three venous and one arterial thrombosis in the delayed group were reported. The patients were taken to the operating room immediately after which re-anastomoses were performed successfully, and all flaps survived. The hospital stay was between 4 and 60 days in the emergency group and 20 and 99 days in delayed group. Infections (P=0.03), vascular complications (P=0.04), and hospital stays (P=0.01) were statistically significantly lower in the emergency group than in the delayed group. Conclusion: ER has many advantages, such as preventing time consuming surgeries and providing short hospital stays and low complication rates, over DR. However, DR is inevitable for some reasons, and despite its more complicated nature, meticulous flap follow-up and salvage procedures may provide the same flap success as found with ERs.

No abstract