In the current trial, improvement in 36-month survival was not observed with upfront surgery for stage IV breast cancer patients. However, a longer follow-up study (median, 40 months) showed statistically significant improvement in median survival. When locoregional treatment in de novo stage IV BC is discussed with the patient as an option, practitioners must consider age, performance status, comorbidities, tumor type, and metastatic disease burden.
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Introduction: Previous reports of carefully selected patients presenting with stage IV breast cancer (BC) suggest that surgery on the primary tumor may result in improved survival, but this remains unproven. The MF07-01 trial is a phase III randomized controlled trial of BC women with distant metastases at presentation who receive loco-regional (LR) treatment for intact primary tumor compared with those who do not receive such treatment.
Aim: The primary objective of the trial is to compare overall survival (OS) in women treated with or without initial LR resection prior to systemic therapy for de novo stage IV BC.
Materials and Methods: At the discretion of the surgeon, LR treatments consisted of either mastectomy or breast conserving surgery with level I-II axillary clearance in clinically or sentinel lymph node positive patients. Radiation therapy to whole breast was required following breast conserving surgery. At the discretion of the medical oncologist standard systemic therapy of either endocrine treatment or chemotherapy (plus trastuzumab for HER2 +) was given to all patients either immediately after randomization (no surgery group) or after surgical resection of the intact primary tumor (surgery group). After consideration of previous retrospective studies, the assumed OS difference between the two groups was determined to be 18% (35% in LR treatment group versus 17% in no-LR treatment group). A 10% drop out rate including lost to follow up was assumed. By using a one sided log-rank test with a 95% confidence (α = 0.05) and a 90% power (β = 0.9), sample size calculation revealed that 271 patients were needed to be randomized.
Results: There were 140 women in the surgery group and 138 in the no-surgery group. The mean follow up time was 21.1 ± 14.5 months. The mean age was 51.6 ± 13.2 years and the groups were comparable regarding age, BMI, ER/PR, Her 2, Triple negative, tumor type and size between the groups (all p>0.05). Metastatic patterns included bone only in 45.7%, organ except bone in 28.8%, and bone plus organ in 25.5%. There were a total of 86 (31%) deaths. At 54 months the survival rate was 35% in the surgery group and 31% in the no surgery group (p = 0.24). However, OS was statistically higher in bone only, ER/PR positive and patients younger than 50 years but was lower in the triple negative patients (p<0.05). The mean survival was 7.1 months higher in surgery group comparing with no surgery group in bone only metastasis (39.1 ± 1.8 vs 32.0 ± 2.2; p = 0.13). Surgery in the group of patients who had solitary bone only metastasis had statistically significant survival benefit compared with no surgery and with patients who had multiple bone metastasis either with or without surgery (P = 0.03).
Conclusion: In early follow-up of this trial comparing surgery of the primary tumor with no surgery in stage IV BC at presentation OS was similar but there were important subgroup differences; in particular those with solitary bone metastasis have a significant survival benefit and patients with bone metastasis only have a trend toward improved survival with initial surgery. Further follow-up will expand on these important findings.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr S2-03.
Gastric adenocarcinoma can be divided into two histopathological types: intestinal and diffuse. In addition to the role of environmental factors, an association between gastric cancer and Helicobacter pylori has been suggested. A retrospective study was therefore carried out among 46 patients who had gastric cancer. As a control group, 40 patients with non-malignant disorders were selected (11 patients with peptic ulcer, 12 with chronic superficial gastritis, 17 with chronic atrophic gastritis). Twenty-six cancers were classified as intestinal type and 20 as diffuse type. H. pylori was found in 23 (88 per cent) of the intestinal type and 11 (55 per cent) of the diffuse type (P < 0.05). Patients with the intestinal-type gastric cancer had a higher prevalence of H. pylori infection than those with gastric ulcer (55 per cent) and chronic superficial gastritis (50 per cent) (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that there is a possible association between the intestinal type of gastric cancer and H. pylori infection.
This paper presents an experimental characterization of the effects of earthquakes on the operation of mechanical systems with the help of CaPaMan (Cassino Parallel Manipulator), which is a 3 DOF robot that can fairly well simulate 3D earthquake motion. The sensitivity of operation characteristics of machinery to earthquake disturbance is identified and characterized through experimental tests. Experimental tests have been carried out by using a slider-crank linkage, a small car model, and LARM Hand as test-bed mechanisms that have been sensored with proper acceleration or force sensors. Results are reported and discussed to describe the effects of earthquake motion on the characteristics of mechanism operation as a service application of the robotic CaPaMan system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.