In this paper, we provide a new framework for understanding infant‐feeding‐related maternal guilt and shame, placing these in the context of feminist theoretical and psychological accounts of the emotions of self‐assessment. Whereas breastfeeding advocacy has been critiqued for its perceived role in inducing maternal guilt, we argue that the emotion women often feel surrounding infant feeding may be better conceptualized as shame in its tendency to involve a negative self‐assessment—a failure to achieve an idealized notion of good motherhood. Further, we suggest, both formula‐feeding and breastfeeding mothers experience shame: the former report feeling that they fail to live up to ideals of womanhood and motherhood, and the latter transgress cultural expectations regarding feminine modesty. The problem, then, is the degree to which mothers are vulnerable to shame generally, regardless of infant feeding practices. As an emotion that is less adaptive and potentially more damaging than guilt, shame ought to be the focus of resistance for both feminists and breastfeeding advocates, who need to work in conjunction with women to oppose this shame by assisting them in constructing their own ideals of good motherhood that incorporate a sense of self‐concern.

Adenoid cystic cancers (ACC) in the head and neck are rare yet present a clinical dilemma. Although 5-y survivals are excellent, they have a propensity for late recurrences. Most of these cancers are initially treated with surgery followed by radiation. When recurrences happen, treatment options are limited both by the morbidity and low efficacy of re-irradiation and repeated surgical resection. Reported response rates to chemotherapy are low and targeted therapies may be one option. We, therefore, investigated signaling pathways that may be active in adenoid cystic cancers. Tissues from the last nine ACC patients resected at the University of Iowa were immunohistochemically stained with antibodies for EGFR, phosphorylated (P) Akt, and P-MAPK in order to molecularly characterize these tumors. An ACC cell line (ACC3) was also characterized by western blot. We found that seven of the nine tumor samples had strong expression of P-Akt and 5/9 had P-MAPK. None of them had EGFR expression. In the ACC3 cell line, similar data was found in that there was P-Akt and P-MAPK but no EGFR expression. We tested the HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir (NFV) which has been shown to inhibit Akt signaling to see its effect on ACC3 cells. Both P-Akt and P-MAPK were inhibited with NFV in ACC3 cells and this resulted in growth inhibition and clonogenic death. In patients where re-irradiation or further surgery is not an option, a trial of NFV may be warranted.

In this article the authors analyze the use of "risks of formula language" versus "benefits of breastfeeding language" in breastfeeding advocacy texts. Feeding intentionality and 434 adult respondents' assessments of advocacy texts were examined at a mid-western university in the fall of 2009. No significant difference was observed between those who read text phrased in terms of "risks of formula feeding" and those who read text describing "benefits of breastfeeding" in feeding intentionality. Results supported the expectation that respondents would less favorably assess texts using risk language-respondents rated risk texts as less trustworthy, accurate, and helpful compared to benefit text. Texts were also varied in "medical" and "breastfeeding advocacy group" affiliations. Analyses revealed that texts including the medical logo were rated significantly more favorably compared to breastfeeding advocacy logo and no logo conditions. Findings suggest that use of risk language may not be an advantageous health promotion strategy, but may be counter-productive to the goals of breastfeeding advocates.

No abstract

No abstract