I n 2012, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) published a guideline on the classification and management of acute kidney injury (AKI). 1 Since then, new evidence has emerged that has important implications for clinical practice. Large epidemiology studies and risk profiles for AKI have become available in adults and children, such as the AKI-Epidemiologic Prospective Investigation (AKI-EPI) study, 2 the 0by25 Initiative, 3 the Southeast Asia-AKI (SEA-AKI) study, 4 and the Assessment of Worldwide Acute Kidney Injury, Renal Angina, and Epidemiology (AWARE) 5 and Assessment of Worldwide Acute Kidney Injury Epidemiology in Neonates (AWAKEN) 6 studies. The effectiveness of the KDIGO recommendations in preventing AKI has been confirmed in small single-center randomized controlled trials (RCTs), such as the Prevention of AKI (PrevAKI) 7 and the
AKI is a global concern with a high incidence among patients across acute care settings. AKI is associated with significant clinical consequences and increased health care costs. Preventive measures, as well as rapid identification of AKI, have been shown to improve outcomes in small studies. Providing high-quality care for patients with AKI or those at risk of AKI occurs across a continuum that starts at the community level and continues in the emergency department, hospital setting, and after discharge from inpatient care. Improving the quality of care provided to these patients, plausibly mitigating the cost of care and improving short- and long-term outcomes, are goals that have not been universally achieved. Therefore, understanding how the management of AKI may be amenable to quality improvement programs is needed. Recognizing this gap in knowledge, the 22nd Acute Disease Quality Initiative meeting was convened to discuss the evidence, provide recommendations, and highlight future directions for AKI-related quality measures and care processes. Using a modified Delphi process, an international group of experts including physicians, a nurse practitioner, and pharmacists provided a framework for current and future quality improvement projects in the area of AKI. Where possible, best practices in the prevention, identification, and care of the patient with AKI were identified and highlighted. This article provides a summary of the key messages and recommendations of the group, with an aim to equip and encourage health care providers to establish quality care delivery for patients with AKI and to measure key quality indicators.
Sarcopenia index is a potentially objective measure for estimating muscle mass that is noninvasive and less expensive. Sarcopenia index could be considered in lung transplant candidate selection following prospective validation in larger cohorts.
Short courses of PTZ/VAN were not associated with a greater risk of short- or 60-day adverse renal outcomes compared to other empiric broad-spectrum combinations.
Serum cystatin C has been proposed as a kidney biomarker to inform drug dosing. We conducted a systematic review to synthesize available data for the association between serum cystatin C and drug pharmacokinetics, dosing, and clinical outcomes in adults (!18 years). PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, EBSCO CINAHL, and Scopus were systematically searched from 1946 to September 2017 to identify candidate studies. Studies of cystatin C as a predictor for acute kidney injury or for management of contrast-associated acute kidney injury were excluded. Also, studies were excluded if drug concentrations were unavailable and if a reference standard for drug dosing (eg, serum creatinine) was not concurrently reported. The outcomes of interest included drug clearance (L/h), concentrations (mg/L), target level achievement (%), therapeutic failure (%), and drug toxicity (%). We included 28 articles that evaluated 16 different medications in 3455 participants. Vancomycin was the most well-studied drug. Overall, cystatin Cebased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR Cystatin C ) was more predictive of drug levels and drug clearance than eGFR Creatinine . In only one study were target attainment and outcomes compared between 2 drug-dosing regimens, one based on eGFR Creatinine-Cystatin C and one dosed with the Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance equation. Compared with eGFR Creatinine , use of eGFR Cystatin C to predict elimination of medications via the kidney was as accurate, if not superior, in most studies, but infrequently were data on target attainment or clinical outcomes reported. Drug-specific dosing protocols that use cystatin C to estimate kidney function should be tested for clinical application.
The clinical utility of ganciclovir therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is unknown. We retrospectively analyzed adult patients treated for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection with ganciclovir with TDM between 2005 and 2015. The primary outcome was an association between ganciclovir TDM and clinical efficacy endpoints within 30 days, defined by viral load and symptomatology. Secondary outcomes included safety endpoints, evaluated within 7 days of the last administered dose of ganciclovir. Of 175 patients evaluated, 82 patients with CMV infection were included in our analysis with a median (interquartile range) baseline CMV viral load of 5,500 (3,000 to 15,200) copies/ml. The majority achieved undetectable or reduced CMV viral load below the lower limit of quantification (74.4%) with improvement in symptomatology (70.7%) at 30 days. Among patients with detectable CMV viremia at 30 days, the viral load had declined to a median of 1,000 (1,000 to 3,090) copies/ml. We did not observe significant associations between the efficacy outcomes and ganciclovir trough (P= 0.20 andP= 0.20, respectively) or peak concentrations (P= 0.14 andP= 0.14, respectively). Similarly, there was no significant association between ganciclovir trough or peak concentrations and safety endpoints, including leukopenia (P= 0.48 andP= 0.69), neutropenia (P= 0.59 andP= 0.69), thrombocytopenia (P= 0.29 andP= 0.37), anemia (P= 0.51 andP= 0.35), nephrotoxicity (P= 0.41 andP= 0.57), and neurotoxicity (P= 0.22 andP= 0.48). We did not observe any associations between ganciclovir TDM and clinical efficacy or safety endpoints. Routine ganciclovir TDM may be of limited value. Future studies may be warranted to identify specific populations with unpredictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics profiles in whom ganciclovir TDM may be of benefit.
BackgroundVasoactive medications are essential in septic shock, but are not fully incorporated into current mortality prediction risk scores. We sought to develop a novel mortality prediction model for septic shock incorporating quantitative vasoactive medication usage.MethodsQuantitative vasopressor use was calculated in a cohort of 5352 septic shock patients and compared using norepinephrine equivalents (NEE), cumulative vasopressor index and the vasoactive inotrope score models. Having best discrimination prediction, log10NEE was selected for further development of a novel prediction model for 28-day and 1-year mortality via backward stepwise logistic regression. This model termed ‘MAVIC’ (Mechanical ventilation, Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation-III, Vasopressors, Inotropes, Charlson comorbidity index) was then compared to Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation-III (APACHE-III) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores in an independent validation cohort for its accuracy in predicting 28-day and 1-year mortality.Measurements and main resultsThe MAVIC model was superior to the APACHE-III and SOFA scores in its ability to predict 28-day mortality (area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.73 vs. 0.66 and 0.60) and 1-year mortality (AUROC 0.74 vs. 0.66 and 0.60), respectively.ConclusionsThe incorporation of quantitative vasopressor usage into a novel ‘MAVIC’ model results in superior 28-day and 1-year mortality risk prediction in a large cohort of patients with septic shock.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.