Background: Disability acceptance is central to the recovery process for people with severe mental illness (SMI). Measuring a client's level of disability acceptance is an important step to develop psychosocial interventions for individuals with SMI in psychiatric rehabilitation. Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the measurement structure of an abbreviated and modified version of the Adaptation to Disability Scale-Revised (ADS-R), the ADS-R-23, for individuals with SMI. Method: One hundred ninety-four participants were recruited from four community-based mental health agencies. The measurement structure of the ADS-R-23 was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Findings: Principal components analysis of the ADS-R-23 yielded two factors (succumbing and positive coping). The ADS-R-23 was found to be associated with four acceptance-related variables (i.e., resilience, social functioning, social support, and self-stigma) in the expected directions. The ADS-R-23 was found to be a multidimensional scale with good reliability. Conclusions: The abbreviated and modified version of the ADS-R, the ADS-R-23, is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing disability acceptance for people with SMI in psychiatric rehabilitation.

No abstract

Unifying the field of rehabilitation counseling appears to be a daunting task. Many researchers have investigated this phenomenon and have also written position papers arguing for a specific identity perspective: either as a counseling specialty or as a separate profession. The current study examined beliefs about the field of rehabilitation counseling among trainees and investigated factors that influenced these beliefs. A scale was developed to collect data about perceptions of master's-level students in Council on Rehabilitation Education (CORE)-accredited training programs. Data were collected from 67 participants in 12 programs. Results indicated that two-thirds of trainees believed that rehabilitation counseling is a counseling specialty. Previous work experience of the trainees was most likely to influence this position.

Unifying the field of rehabilitation counseling appears to be a daunting task. Many researchers have investigated this phenomenon and have also written position papers arguing for a specific identity perspective: either as a counseling specialty or as a separate profession. The current study examined beliefs about the field of rehabilitation counseling among trainees and investigated factors that influenced these beliefs. A scale was developed to collect data about perceptions of master's-level students in Council on Rehabilitation Education (CORE)-accredited training programs. Data were collected from 67 participants in 12 programs. Results indicated that two-thirds of trainees believed that rehabilitation counseling is a counseling specialty. Previous work experience of the trainees was most likely to influence this position. Barnes et al.

Children and adolescents from low-income families now comprise a majority of public school students nationally. As the number of students from low-income backgrounds increases, so does the achievement gap between them and their wealthier peers. This phenomenological qualitative study examined a national sample of high-achieving, low-income middle school students’ ( N = 24) perspectives on what schools can do to promote the academic achievement of students from low-income backgrounds. Three main themes and seven subthemes were identified: create a culture of hope, develop relational networks, and establish meaningful parent–school collaborations. Implications for counselors and educators serving youth living in poverty are discussed.