OBJECTIVES: This study estimated morbidity and mortality attributable to substance abuse in Canada. METHODS: Pooled estimates of relative risk were used to calculate etiologic fractions by age, gender, and province for 91 causes of disease or death attributable to alcohol, tobacco, or illicit drugs. RESULTS: There were 33,498 deaths and 208,095 hospitalizations attributed to tobacco, 6701 deaths and 86,076 hospitalizations due to alcohol, and 732 deaths and 7095 hospitalizations due to illicit drugs in 1992. CONCLUSIONS: Substance abuse exacts a considerable toll on Canadian society in terms of morbidity and mortality, accounting for 21% of deaths, 23% of years of potential life lost, and 8% of hospitalizations.
The present paper describes promising research directions that emerged from a recent international conference on intoxication and aggression and from the scientific literature generally. In this overview, intoxicated aggression is seen as arising from an interactional process involving multiple contributing factors or causes. This model helps to define research directions that can further understanding and prevention. First, the societal/cultural framing of intoxication and aggression exerts a powerful influence on drinking behaviour and needs to be better understood. Another important area for research is the moderating role on alcohol-related aggression of personal factors such as predisposition to aggression and individual differences in expectations about alcohol and aggression. Research on the role of basic pharmacological effects of alcohol in increasing the likelihood of aggressive behaviour is also a critical aspect of understanding intoxicated aggression. Drinking contexts and environments play a considerable role in the relationship between intoxication and aggressive behaviour and need to be better understood. Another critical direction for future research is the study of intoxicated aggression as a process involving the interaction of the person, the situation and the effects of alcohol in natural and experimental settings. Finally, the paper highlights promising directions for research on interventions to prevent intoxicated aggression and violence.
A standard drink is defined as one 341 mL (12 oz.) bottle of beer (5% alcohol), one 142 mL (5 oz.) glass of table wine (12% alcohol), one 43 mL (1.5 oz.) serving of spirits (40% alcohol) or one 85 mL (3 oz.) serving of fortified wine, such as sherry or port (18% alcohol).
Welcome to the Harm Reduction Digest, where in each regular edition of Thug and Alcohol Review invited co‐authors will contribute to pieces on the theory and practice of harm reduction. While the focus of subsequent HR Digests will be accounts of the practice of harm reduction interventions, programmes and policies from around the world, it was decided that the first Digest ought to address the definition of Harm Reduction. Consequently the style of this digest is probably more formal than most that will follow it. Many of you will have read DAR's special issue on harm reduction (1995, 14(3)) where Alex Wodak, Bill Saunders, Patricia Erickson, Eric Single and Nick Heather all addressed the issue of definition in their respective contributions. Since this there have been a handful of papers and reports which have also grappled with the issue of definition. Co‐author of this piece is Professor Eric Single, from the Department of Public Health Sciences at the University of Toronto. Eric addressed issues around the definition of harm reduction in the 1996 Dorothy Black lecture in London and, with Professor Timothy Rohl, as independent evaluators of Australia's National Drug Strategy, wrote on the topic in their report ‘Mapping the Future’.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.