SummaryDespite the intimate link between cell organization and function, the principles underlying intracellular organization and the relation between organization, gene expression and phenotype are not well understood. We address this by creating a benchmark for mean cell organization and the natural range of cell-to-cell variation. This benchmark can be used for comparison to other normal or abnormal cell states. To do this, we developed a reproducible microscope imaging pipeline to generate a high-quality dataset of 3D, high-resolution images of over 200,000 live cells from 25 isogenic human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) lines from the Allen Cell Collection. Each line contains one fluorescently tagged protein, created via endogenous CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, representing a key cellular structure or organelle. We used these images to develop a new multi-part and generalizable analysis approach of the locations, amounts, and variation of these 25 cellular structures. Taking an integrated approach, we found that both the extent to which a structure’s individual location varied (“stereotypy”) and the extent to which the structure localized relative to all the other cellular structures (“concordance”) were robust to a wide range of cell shape variation, from flatter to taller, smaller to larger, or less to more polarized cells. We also found that these cellular structures varied greatly in how their volumes scaled with cell and nuclear size. These analyses create a data-driven set of quantitative rules for the locations, amounts, and variation of 25 cellular structures within the hiPSC as a normal baseline for cell organization.

Understanding how a subset of expressed genes dictates cellular phenotype is a considerable challenge owing to the large numbers of molecules involved, their combinatorics and the plethora of cellular behaviours that they determine1,2. Here we reduced this complexity by focusing on cellular organization—a key readout and driver of cell behaviour3,4—at the level of major cellular structures that represent distinct organelles and functional machines, and generated the WTC-11 hiPSC Single-Cell Image Dataset v1, which contains more than 200,000 live cells in 3D, spanning 25 key cellular structures. The scale and quality of this dataset permitted the creation of a generalizable analysis framework to convert raw image data of cells and their structures into dimensionally reduced, quantitative measurements that can be interpreted by humans, and to facilitate data exploration. This framework embraces the vast cell-to-cell variability that is observed within a normal population, facilitates the integration of cell-by-cell structural data and allows quantitative analyses of distinct, separable aspects of organization within and across different cell populations. We found that the integrated intracellular organization of interphase cells was robust to the wide range of variation in cell shape in the population; that the average locations of some structures became polarized in cells at the edges of colonies while maintaining the ‘wiring’ of their interactions with other structures; and that, by contrast, changes in the location of structures during early mitotic reorganization were accompanied by changes in their wiring.

No abstract

In 2014, in response to a large volume of feedback from industry, the science community, and internal to Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), GSFC's Safety and Mission Assurance (SMA) Directorate began a transition to a risk-based implementation of SMA, departing from its longstanding practice of being primarily driven by a mostly-static set of Mission Assurance Requirements. The transition started out with a pilot project involving risk-based acceptance of bare printed circuit boards that was enormously successful, continued through a complete organizational transformation in 2015, and culminated with the baselining of formal Risk-Based SMA policy in 2016. This paper highlights five major examples of successful implementation of Risk-Based SMA that have demonstrated not only substantial savings in project resources, but also the ability to achieve the lowest level of risk in developing and operating inherently risky systems.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract