2018
DOI: 10.1080/08982112.2018.1473584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk-based safety and mission assurance: Approach and experiences in practice

Abstract: In 2014, in response to a large volume of feedback from industry, the science community, and internal to Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), GSFC's Safety and Mission Assurance (SMA) Directorate began a transition to a risk-based implementation of SMA, departing from its longstanding practice of being primarily driven by a mostly-static set of Mission Assurance Requirements. The transition started out with a pilot project involving risk-based acceptance of bare printed circuit boards that was enormously succes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, test sample nonconformances to a standard do not, in general, equate to PCB failures. In light of the lack of supporting reliability data and the requirements imposed in the IPC specifications, a process was implemented to utilize a risk-based decision to determine acceptability of nonconformances stemming from the PCB copper wrap requirements [13]. The impact of the nonconformance to standards and the resulting defects was explored and the merits of requirements were established using a series of experimental and modeling efforts that are described in the following sections.…”
Section: Industry Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, test sample nonconformances to a standard do not, in general, equate to PCB failures. In light of the lack of supporting reliability data and the requirements imposed in the IPC specifications, a process was implemented to utilize a risk-based decision to determine acceptability of nonconformances stemming from the PCB copper wrap requirements [13]. The impact of the nonconformance to standards and the resulting defects was explored and the merits of requirements were established using a series of experimental and modeling efforts that are described in the following sections.…”
Section: Industry Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%