A non-North American provenance for the lower Belt Supergroup of North America has been used to support various pre-Rodinian paleogeographic reconstructions. Unlike the lower Belt Supergroup, most upper Belt Supergroup provenance studies have inferred Laurentian sediment sources. We test this hypothesis by analyzing U-Pb and Lu-Hf isotopes on detrital zircons, and whole-rock Nd isotopes from the Missoula (upper Belt Supergroup) and Lemhi Groups, and comparing to possible Laurentian sources. Detrital zircons from 11 sandstones analyzed show dominant ages between 1680 and 1820 Ma. These zircons are predominantly magmatic in paragenesis. Belt Supergroup-aged (1400-1470 Ma) and 2400-2700 Ma populations represent minor components. Lu-Hf isotopic analyses for 1675-1780 Ma Missoula Group and Lemhi Group detrital zircons range from εHf(i) +9 to -12 and +8 and -7, respectively. Belt Supergroup-aged grains from the Bonner Formation, Missoula Group, have εHf(i) values between +5 and -9, exceeding coeval ranges from the Mojave and Yavapai terranes [εHf(i) between +5 and 0]. Whole-rock Nd isotopes from Lemhi Group argillites yield a range in εNd(1400) between +1.1 and -5.9. Immature feldspathic sediment, nearly unimodal detrital zircon
spectra, and dissimilar Belt Supergroup-aged zircon Hf signatures suggest that distal portions of the Yavapai and Mojave terranes intruded by A-type magmas were not the source for the Missoula and Lemhi Groups. Instead, a slightly modifi ed Mesoproterozoic proto-SWEAT (southwestern United States and East Antarctica) model can best account for the sedimentologic and isotopic characteristics of the Missoula and LemhiGroups. An alternative model with a source from southeastern Siberia and the Okhotsk Massif is less preferred. and implications for granite petrogenesis:
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.