Purpose The aim of the study is to evaluate the level of sensible impairment after mastectomy or implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). In addition, factors influencing breast sensibility were evaluated. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed in Maastricht University Medical Center between July 2016 and August 2018. Women with unilateral mastectomy with or without IBBR were included. Objective sensory measurements were performed using Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments. Their healthy breast served as control, using a paired t test. Differences between mastectomy with and without IBBR were evaluated using the independent t test. Linear regression was performed to evaluate the association between patient characteristics on breast sensibility. The paired t test was used to evaluate in which part of the breast the sensibility is best preserved. Results Fifty-one patients were eligible for inclusion. Sixteen patients underwent IBBR after mastectomy. Twenty-three patients received radiotherapy and 35 patients received chemotherapy. Monofilament values were significantly higher in the operated group compared to the reference group ( p < 0.001). Linear regression showed a statistically significant association between IBBR and objectively measured impaired sensation ( p = 0.008). After mastectomy, the cutaneous protective sensation is only diminished. After IBBR, it is lost in the majority of the breast. The medial part of the breast was significantly more sensitive than the lateral part in all operated breasts ( p < 0.001). Conclusion IBBR has a significantly negative impact on the breast sensibility compared to mastectomy alone. This study shows that the protective sensation of the skin in the breast is lost after IBBR. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the level of sensible impairment after mastectomy or IBBR. More research is necessary to confirm these results. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-019-05137-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

This trial is registered under the name "Sensory Nerve Coaptation in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction," ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT04093999 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04093999).

Background Patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction is dependent on both esthetics and functional outcomes. In an attempt to improve breast sensibility, a sensory nerve coaptation can be performed. The aim of this study was to objectify the sensory recovery in patients who, by chance, underwent bilateral autologous breast reconstruction with one innervated and one non-innervated flap. It must be emphasized that the intention was to coaptate the sensory nerves on both sides. Methods The cohort study was carried out in the Maastricht University Medical Center between August 2016 and August 2018. Patients were eligible if they underwent bilateral non-complex, autologous breast reconstruction with unilateral sensory nerve coaptation and underwent sensory measurements using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments at 12 months of follow-up. Sensory outcomes were compared using t tests. Results A total of 15 patients were included, all contributing one innervated and one non-innervated flap. All patients had a follow-up of at least 12 months, but were measured at different follow-up points with a mean follow-up of 19 months. Sensory nerve coaptation was significantly associated with better sensation in the innervated breasts and showed better sensory recovery over time, compared to non-innervated breasts. Moreover, the protective sensation of the skin can be restored by sensory nerve coaptation. Conclusions The study demonstrated that sensory nerve coaptation leads to better sensation in the autologous reconstructed breast in patients who underwent bilateral breast reconstruction and, by chance, received unilateral sensory nerve coaptation.

Introduction Better sensation in the reconstructed breast improves the quality of life. Sensory nerve coaptation is a valuable addition to autologous breast reconstruction. There are few publications concerning the sensory nerves of the breast and the nipple‐areola complex and reports are contradictory, so it is unknown which nerve is best suited as a recipient for coaptation. The current study serves as a proof of concept. Materials and Methods The areas innervated by the anterior cutaneous branches (ACBs) of the intercostal nerves (ICNs) were studied on two separate occasions in two healthy women. First, the ACBs of ICNs 2–5 were individually blocked using ultrasound. Next, the ACBs of all levels were blocked simultaneously. Sensation was measured using Semmes‐Weinstein monofilaments. The numbed areas corresponding to the ICNs were drawn in a raster of 2 × 2 cm. Results The largest area was supplied by the ACB of the 4th ICN, located in the upper (UIQ) and the lower (LIQ) inner quadrants of the breast. The 2nd‐largest area was supplied by the ACB of the 3rd ICN. Blockage of ACBs 2–5 affected sensation in the nipple and the areola. Conclusions Blockage of all levels 2–5 partially affected sensation in the nipple‐areola complex, suggesting innervation by a nerve plexus consisting of both ACBs and lateral cutaneous branches (LCBs). ACB4 supplied the largest area of the breast in the UIQ and LIQ and could be best suited for sensory nerve coaptation to optimize sensation in the autologously reconstructed breast.

Background: Primary cadaveric studies were reviewed to give a contemporary overview of what is known about innervation of the female breast and nipple/nipple-areola complex. Methods: The authors performed a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses–compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. The authors searched four electronic databases for studies investigating which nerve branches supply the female breast and nipple/nipple-areola complex or describing the trajectory and other anatomical features of these nerves. Inclusion criteria for meta-analysis were at least five studies of known sample size and with numerical observed values. Pooled prevalence estimates of nerve branches supplying the nipple/nipple-areola complex were calculated using random-effects meta-analyses; the remaining results were structured using qualitative synthesis. Risk of bias within individual studies was assessed with the Anatomical Quality Assurance checklist. Results: Of 3653 studies identified, 19 were eligible for qualitative synthesis and seven for meta-analysis. The breast skin is innervated by anterior cutaneous branches and lateral cutaneous branches of the second through sixth and the nipple/nipple-areola complex primarily by anterior cutaneous branches and lateral cutaneous branches of the third through fifth intercostal nerves. The anterior cutaneous branch and lateral cutaneous branch of the fourth intercostal nerve supply the largest surface area of the breast skin and nipple/nipple-areola complex. The lateral cutaneous branch of the fourth intercostal nerve is the most consistent contributory nerve to the nipple/nipple-areola complex (pooled prevalence, 89.0 percent; 95 percent CI, 0.80 to 0.94). Conclusions: The anterior cutaneous branch and lateral cutaneous branch of the fourth intercostal nerve are the most important nerves to spare or repair during reconstructive and cosmetic breast surgery. Future studies are required to elicit the course of dominant nerves through the breast tissue.

No abstract

Background: In this cohort study, the authors compared breast sensation and quality of life (QoL) after replacement of an implant-based breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction in a singular sample of women. Methods: Women with implant-based breast reconstruction before their DIEP flap were included. Women formed their own control. Breast sensation was measured using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. QoL was evaluated using BREAST-Q questionnaires. Preoperative (T0) sensation and QoL were compared with postoperative values at 6 months (T1), at 12 months (T2), and at maximum follow-up (Tmax, sensation only). A linear mixed effects regression was used for Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments measurements; a paired samples t test was used for BREAST-Q scores. Most women chose replacement of their implant by a DIEP flap because of implant-related complaints. Results: Postoperative sensation decreased significantly compared with preoperative sensation after T1 (mean, 5.1 months), T2 (mean, 14.6 months), and Tmax (mean, 17.6 months) for the total breast but recovers to preoperative levels for the native skin after an average of 1.5 years. Nerve coaptation positively influenced recovery of sensation. BREAST-Q scores increased significantly after 6 and 12 months over the domains Satisfaction with Breasts, Psychosocial Well-Being, Physical Well-Being of the Chest, and Sexual Well-Being. Scores decreased significantly in Physical Well-Being of the Abdomen after 6 months. Conclusion: Replacing an implant with a DIEP flap initially causes a decrease in overall breast sensation, gradually recovering to preoperative levels for native skin, and can significantly increase QoL with the right indication. Superior recovery of sensation and QoL may be obtained by accompanying the DIEP flap with nerve coaptation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Background: Sensory nerve coaptation in autologous breast reconstruction positively affects sensory recovery in the reconstructed breast. However, patient-reported outcomes are lacking and no conclusions on the clinical relevance of nerve coaptation could be drawn. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of nerve coaptation in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted of patients undergoing innervated or noninnervated DIEP flap breast reconstruction between August of 2016 and August of 2018. Patients completed a BREAST-Q questionnaire at a minimum of 12 months’ follow-up in combination with either a preoperative questionnaire or a questionnaire at 6 months’ follow-up. The physical well-being of the chest domain was the primary outcome and patients answered additional sensation-specific questions. Sensation was measured using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. Results: In total, 120 patients were included (65 innervated and 55 noninnervated reconstructions). A clinically relevant difference was found in BREAST-Q scores in favor of patients with innervated reconstructions in general and for delayed reconstructions specifically. Patients with sensate breast reconstruction more often reported better and pleasant sensation. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that nerve coaptation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction, specifically in delayed reconstruction, resulted in clinically relevant improved patient-reported outcomes on the physical well-being of the chest domain of the BREAST-Q and that better sensation was perceived. However, the BREAST-Q does not address sensation adequately, and the introduction and validation of new scales is required to confirm the clinical relevance of nerve coaptation reliably. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.