Land suitability assessment for irrigation is critical to inform as well as manage current and future irrigated agriculture production systems. Land suitability analysis determines whether a given land area could potentially be used for specific crop production. The objective of this study was to identify the availability of suitable land for surface irrigation systems for the production of millet, sorghum, sugarcane, and wheat production in the Lower Omo Gibe plain, Southern Ethiopia. Land suitability analysis was performed by a parametric method using factors such as soil texture, effective soil depth, Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3), soil electrical conductivity (ECe), drainage class, and slope. Five land suitability classes were identified that include highly suitable (S1), moderately suitable (S2), marginally suitable (S3), currently not suitable (N1), and permanently not suitable (N2). Results showed that 6.6, 7.5, 6.6, and 6.6% of the study area mostly located in the western part of the basin, were highly suitable (S1) for irrigated millets, sorghum, sugarcane, and wheat crops production, respectively. However, the mountainous areas in the central part of the basin were classified as N2 due to the steep slope and shallow soil depth. Overall, the results of the study revealed that the use of various suitability analysis techniques could assist in identifying suitable land for irrigated agriculture.
This study assessed the potential applications of open data source satellite images in estimating the phenology of the wheat crop on a study farm found in the village of Ovcha Mogila, Bulgaria. A Landsat-9 and Sentinel-2 satellite images were extracted from the open data sources. An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) was used to capture the spectral response of plant leaves. In addition, SpectraVue 710s Leaf Spectrometer was used to measure the spectral response of the crop at five different locations. The soil samples were collected in eight spots within the farm plot. The physicochemical properties of the soil (pH, texture, N, P2 O5, and K2 O) were analyzed in the certified laboratory of AUP. The five broadband vegetation indices (VIs) have been estimated based on the reflectance wavelength range of remote sensing tools. A linear regression analysis was used along with the coefficient of determination (R2 ), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and correlation (r) matrix for comparing the performance of the sensors. The soil analysis revealed the study farm plot is slightly alkaline with a dominant soil texture of Clay and Clay Loam. The vegetation indices (VIs) increased linearly with crop development. Significant correlations were observed for most vegetation indices of Sentinel-2, Landsat-9, and the Buteo drone, with the highest correlation for NDVI of Sentinel-2 and Buteo drone (R2 of 0.37 and RMSE of 0.06). In relative terms, the Sentinel-2 VIs correlated better with the Buteo drone vegetation indices than the Landsat-9. The Landsat-9 VIs somewhat align better with the leaf spectrometer.
<p>Dams impose changes in water flow and sediment transfer that cause large-scale alterations in the downstream river morphology. The Lower Zambezi River's hydrology and morphology regime changed due to the two large impoundments in the middle part of the basin. The main goal of this study is to analyze the long-term effect of damming on the Lower Zambezi River and its delta based on analytical methods and 1D morphological modeling. The geographical, hydrological, and morphological data are analyzed to describe the current and past river conditions and infer morphological trends. The water and sediment balances of the basin developed by Carimo (2020) form the basis for the present study. The land cover of the Lower Zambezi river basin from 1989 to 2019 is determined using Google Earth Engine (GGE), a web-based image analysis tool. The long-term morphological changes of the river are assessed using the Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI). The satellite image analysis revealed a deposition trend in Zone B and Zone C, while the Zambezi delta remained stable between 1986 to 2019.&#160; Data analysis shows that the river's width increased significantly after the dam (2007), with the highest river width change observed in Zone C. Besides, a reduction of thalweg was observed in Zone B, while the average bed level increased in most sections of the river. There has also been a reduction in bed levels in Zone D after the construction of the dam. The impact of damming on the river is further analyzed using a 1D morphological model. Appropriate flow and sediment boundary conditions, grid size, and initial conditions are provided to the model based on measured data complemented by indirect assessments where data are missing. The model calibration based on Ch&#233;zy's coefficient results in good agreement between measured and simulated water levels. The model output revealed that it could reproduce the river's average bed level for 1962 and 2007. The simulations of future developments have been carried out for 300 years (2007 to 2307), starting from the 2007 bed level profile and cross-sections. The discharge regimes of the Zambezi River and tributaries have been modified based on published discharge projections for 2100 to include the impact of climate change. The downstream boundary condition has also been adjusted based on IPCC mean sea level rise scenarios. The model predicts that there will be erosion in the first 200 km downstream of Cahora Bassa, but no significant bed level changes are expected in the other reaches. Deposition in the bifurcation channel in the delta does not cope with sea-level rise for both scenarios. This shows a "river drowning" trend due to the delta's lack of sediment input to cope with the predicted future sea-level rise. In general, river bed erosion due to the effect of the Cahora Bassa dam will be limited to the first 200 km of the river.</p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.