Background Therapeutic options for hospitalized patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (sCOVID-19) are limited. Preliminary data have shown promising results with baricitinib, but real-life experience is lacking. We assessed the safety and effectiveness of add-on baricitinib to standard-of-care (SOC) including dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with sCOVID-19. Methods This study is a 2-center, observational, retrospective cohort study of patients with sCOVID-19, comparing outcomes and serious events between patients treated with SOC versus those treated with SOC and baricitinib combination. Results We included 369 patients with sCOVID-19 (males 66.1%; mean age 65.2 years; median symptom duration 6 days). The SOC was administered in 47.7% and combination in 52.3%. Patients treated with the combination reached the composite outcome (intensive care unit [ICU] admission or death) less frequently compared with SOC (22.3% vs 36.9%, P = .002). Mortality rate was lower with the combination in the total cohort (14.7% vs 26.6%, P = .005), and ICU admission was lower in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (29.7% vs 44.8%, P = .03). By multivariable analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.36–2.44, per 10-year increase), partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = .52–0.68, per 10 units increase), and use of high-flow nasal cannula (OR = 0.34; 95% CI, .16–0.74) were associated with the composite outcome, whereas baricitinib use was marginally not associated with the composite outcome (OR = 0.52; 95% CI, .26–1.03). However, baricitinib use was found to be significant after inverse-probability weighted regression (OR = 0.93; 95% CI, .87–0.99). No difference in serious events was noted between treatment groups. Conclusions In real-life settings, addition of baricitinib to SOC in patients hospitalized with sCOVID-19 is associated with decreased mortality without concerning safety signals.
BackgroundIn this study, we aimed to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) six months after their hospitalization and compare it to that of nonhospitalized patients with mild COVID-19 and healthy controls. MethodologyParticipants were enrolled between September 2021 and April 2022 and included hospitalized COVID-19 patients at General Hospital of Athens "Hippocration" who had been discharged at least six months prior to enrollment, non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19, and healthy controls. Collected data included demographics, disease severity, medication history, and comorbidities. Participants completed a EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5Levels (EQ5D5L), a Short Form 36 version 2 (SF36v2), a Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), and a Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale (PCFSS) regarding HRQL before and six months after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. In the case of healthy controls, two sets of questionnaires were completed at least six months apart. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS version 25 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). ResultsA total of 151 participants were enrolled. Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 demonstrated a statistically significant deterioration in most parameters of SF36v2 as well as both parameters of the EQ5D5L and FACIT-F questionnaires. Hospitalized patients exhibited worse results in SF36v2 and EQ5D5L when compared to both healthy controls as well as those with mild COVID-19 (p < 0.05). Hospitalized women, in particular, were shown to fare worse than other women in parameters associated with both mental/psychological and physical health (p < 0.05). Hospitalized patients between 41 and 60 years old demonstrated a statistically significant drop in the scores of all three main questionnaires compared to their previous health status (p < 0.05). Hospitalized patients between 61 and 80 years old exhibited a similar trend, but statistical significance was achieved in fewer parameters. HRQL decline was greater in both age groups compared to that of healthy and milder disease counterparts. There was a significant correlation between the results from the three main questionnaires. Similarly, PCFS scale values were shown to correlate with disease severity (hospitalization or not) and age. ConclusionsHRQL remained noticeably impacted six months after hospitalization due to COVID-19. The physical and mental/psychological stress of severe COVID-19 translated into lasting health deterioration, especially for women and those aged 41-60 years old. The use of questionnaires, such as those implemented in this study, might help in the early detection of patients who could benefit from rehabilitation programs. Psychological, as well as physical and social, support is crucial to alleviate the burden of post-COVID-19 symptomatology and expedite the recovery of this group of patients.
Objective: Wilson disease is a rare genetic disorder of copper metabolism with a wide range of clinical presentations. The aim of this study is to describe the 30-year clinical experience in the management of Wilson disease patients followed at two Greek referral centers. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify past and present Wilson disease patients diagnosed during the last 30 years. Results: Sixty-three patients were included. The median age of diagnosis was 19 (3–59) years, while nine (14%) patients were older than 40 years old. Clinical presentation included asymptomatic liver disease (57.1%), neurological disease (20.6%), overt liver disease (12.7%), acute liver failure (6.3%) and other (3.2%). Kayser–Fleischer rings were detected in 27/62 with a higher frequency in neurologic patients (P < 0.001). Ceruloplasmin values were low in 55/63 with significantly lower values in patients with neurological disease (P = 0.048) and in cirrhotic patients (P = 0.017). Increased 24-hour urine copper was measured in 59/63 patients. D-penicillamine was administered in 56/63 patients (88.8%), followed by trientine (6/63, 9.5%), while one patient needed liver transplantation at baseline. At least one treatment switch was performed in 18 patients. By the end of follow-up, all non-cirrhotic patients (25/25) were stable, 3/23 (13%) cirrhotic developed decompensated liver disease, two developed HCC, three received a liver transplant and two died. Five out of 13 neurologic patients had persisting symptoms despite treatment. Conclusion: Wilson disease presents with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations and should be investigated even in older patients, as early diagnosis, close follow-up and treatment monitoring usually provide favorable outcomes.
ObjectivesNonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most widespread chronic liver disease type in the Western countries. Ultrasound (US) is used for NAFLD and hepatic steatosis (HS) grading. The most popular US method for NAFLD assessment is the hepatorenal index (HRI), but because of its limitations, other noninvasive methods have been developed. The Resona 7 US system has recently incorporated an US attenuation–related quantitative feature, liver ultrasound attenuation (LiSA), for HS estimation. The purpose of this study is to compare LiSA’s and HRI’s performance on NAFLD assessment.MethodsA total of 159 NAFLD patients having a magnetic resonance imaging–proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) examination were examined by 2 radiologists, who performed LiSA and HRI measurements in the liver. Correlation of LiSA's and HRI's measurements with MRI-PDFF values was calculated through Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). To further investigate the performance of LiSA and HRI, optimum cutoffs, provided by the literature, were used to correspond HS grades to MRI-PDFF results. Moreover, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis on LiSA measurements and steatosis grades was performed.ResultsMagnetic resonance imaging–PDFF was better correlated with LiSA (PCC = 0.80) than HRI (PCC = 0.67). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed better performance range for LiSA (77.8%–91.8%) than for HRI (72.8%–85.4%) on all HS grades for all studies used for corresponding MRI-PDFF values to HS grades.ConclusionsThe results indicate that LiSA is more accurate than HRI in HS differentiation and can lead to more accurate grading of HS on NAFLD patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.