The distribution of upper respiratory viral loads (VL) in asymptomatic children infected with SARS-CoV-2 is unknown. We assessed PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values and estimated VL in infected asymptomatic children diagnosed in nine pediatric hospital testing programs. Records for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with positive clinical SARS-CoV-2 tests were reviewed. Ct values were adjusted by centering each value around the institutional median Ct value from symptomatic children tested with that assay, and converted to estimated VL (copies/mL) using internal or manufacturer data. Adjusted Ct values and estimated VL for asymptomatic versus symptomatic children (118 vs. 197 ages 0-4; 79 vs 97 ages 5-9; 69 vs 75 ages 10-13; 73 vs 109 ages 14-17) were compared. The median adjusted Ct value in asymptomatic children was 10.3 cycles higher than for symptomatic children (p< 0.0001), and VL 3-4 logs lower (p<0.0001); differences were consistent (p<0.0001) across all four age brackets. These differences were consistent across all institutions and by sex, ethnicity, and race. Asymptomatic children with diabetes (OR 6.5, p = 0.01), recent contact (OR 2.3, p = 0.02), and testing for surveillance (OR 2.7, p = 0.005) had higher estimated risk of having a Ct value in the lowest quartile than children without, while immunocompromise had no effect. Children with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection had lower levels of virus in the nasopharynx/oropharynx than symptomatic children, but timing of infection relative to diagnosis likely impacted levels in asymptomatic children. Caution is recommended when choosing diagnostic tests for screening of asymptomatic children.

No abstract

No abstract

Background A recent study from Taiwan suggested that Clostridium innocuum may be an unrecognized cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) and clinically indistinguishable from C. difficile infection. Our objective was to compare C. innocuum prevalence and strain between those with AAD and asymptomatic controls. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we collected stool from 200 individuals with AAD and 100 asymptomatic controls. We evaluated the association between AAD and C. innocuum in stool using anaerobic culture and qPCR. To identify strain-specific associations with AAD, we performed whole genome sequencing of C. innocuum isolates using Illumina MiSeq and constructed comparative genomics analyses. Results C. innocuum was isolated from stool of 126/300 (42%) subjects and more frequently from asymptomatic controls than AAD subjects (50/100 [50%] vs. 76/200 [38%], respectively; p = 0.047). C. innocuum isolation frequency was not associated with AAD in either the adult or pediatric subgroups. C. innocuum and C. difficile were frequently co-prevalent in individuals with and without diarrhea. There were no phylogenetic differences or accessory genome associations between C. innocuum isolates from AAD subjects and asymptomatic controls. Conclusion C. innocuum was frequently isolated and at a greater frequency in asymptomatic controls than those with AAD. We did not identify strain lineages or accessory genomic elements associated with AAD. These data highlight that differentiating C. innocuum-associated diarrhea from asymptomatic colonization, and differentiating diarrhea caused by C. difficile from C. innocuum, are clinical microbiology challenges that require additional investigation to identify host-specific factors and/or biomarkers that distinguish these conditions.