Identifying individuals with MCI who will progress to dementia or more severe cognitive impairment is a challenge. This study shows that cognitive measures provide valuable information regarding the predictive diagnosis of persons with MCI. Predictive accuracy of a cognitive battery might be optimized by selecting both memory and nonmemory measures.
This study assessed executive functions in persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) using the Tower of London (TOL). A second objective was to study the impact of three types of problem selected according to the presence or absence of a "trigger." A trigger (T) is an incitation to the participant, at the first move, to move a ball to its final position according to the model. A positive trigger (T+) is helpful, while a negative trigger (T-) creates an obstruction. Some problems have no trigger (N). This study includes 81 participants with MCI. After follow-up, one year later, two subgroups were distinguished: (a) 51 (63%) participants did not convert or decline (stable MCI); (b) 30 (37%) participants showed significant decline or progressed to dementia (decliner MCI). Persons with MCI were compared to an older adult group matched with respect to sex, age, and education. For the successes, there was a significant group difference between the three types of problem. The post hoc analysis showed that T+ took significantly less time than N or T-. There were significantly more successes for T+ than N, and these two types of problem had more success than T-. For "total number of moves," there was no significant difference between the groups. In post hoc analysis, T- involved more moves than N or T+. In qualitative analysis, T- MCI decliners produced significantly more rule breakings than the stable MCI and controls. A dysfunction in self-monitoring is a characteristic feature of persons with MCI.
This study is likely to have a significant impact on the well-being of persons with MCI by contributing to the development of adapted and scientifically supported cognitive and psychosocial interventions.
Abstract. Only a limited number of studies have investigated the decline of discrete cognitive domains as individuals progress from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia. Thus, the goal of this longitudinal study was to evaluate the cognitive changes underway during the years preceding a diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease (AD), and to compare these changes to those found in MCI participants who do not progress to dementia. Participants were compared as a function of whether they later converted to AD (n = 47) or not (n = 74). Cognitive change was assessed prior to the conversion year, using that year as a starting point. A combination of polynomial regression analyses and mixed ANOVAs assessed 1) the trajectory of cognitive decline for each domain and 2) the differences between non-progressors and those who had converted to AD. The different cognitive domains demonstrated very different patterns of decline in the group of MCI progressors. A quadratic function, i.e., many years of stable performance followed by a rapid decline just prior to diagnosis, was observed for delayed recall, working memory, and spatial memory. In contrast, a gradual linear decline was observed for immediate recall, executive function, and visuo-spatial abilities. Finally, language in progressors was impaired on all time periods relative to non-progressors, but there was no further change between the first assessments and conversion to AD. Individuals with MCI who progress to AD show abnormal cognition at least two years prior to their dementia diagnosis. The pattern of symptom change observed appears to depend upon the cognitive domain and thus, clinical studies should not assume similar rate of decline across domains. In contrast and, apart from verbal memory, the non-progressors present a performance similar to that of healthy older adults.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.