Os sensores que medem as características do solo em campo são importantes ferramentas para o manejo da agricultura de precisão, entre eles, destaca-se o sensor de contato, que mede a condutividade elétrica (CE), matéria orgânica (MO) e potencial hidrogeniônico (pH) do solo. Objetivou-se avaliar os erros dos métodos de interpolação por krigagem, inverso da distância e normal da distância a partir de dados de CE, MO e pH do solo. O experimento foi realizado no município de Candói – PR, onde foram amostradas duas áreas, os dados foram coletados por sensor de contato, o qual foi conFigurado para uma coleta de 150 pontos por hectare para a condutividade elétrica e a matéria orgânica, e para potencial hidrogeniônico a frequência de coleta foi de 15 pontos por hectare, o equipamento foi acoplado em um trator operado a uma velocidade de 8 km h-1 com passadas paralelas de 20 m. Realizaram-se análises variográficas, validação cruzada e elaboração de mapas. Os menores erros de interpolação ou “jack knifing” para CE, MO e pH foram apresentados pelo método de interpolação inverso da distância, para o talhão T2, e no talhão T1 o método da Krigagem obteve os menores erros para o pH. Concluiu-se que distância das amostragens foi adequada e a krigagem e o inverso da distância foram mais eficientes que o normal da distância. Verificou-se que quanto maior a potência de elevação, tanto para o método do inverso da distância quanto para normal da distância, os erros aumentam e também o grau de contagiosidade.Palavras-chave: geoestatística, sensor Veris, variabilidade espacial. METHODS OF DATA INTERPOLATIONS OBTAINED BY PRECISION AGRICULTURE SENSORS ABSTRACT:The sensors that measure soil characteristics in the field are important tools for the management of precision agriculture, among them the contact sensor, which measures the electrical conductivity (EC), organic matter (OM) and hydrogenation potential (pH) of the soil. The objective of this study was to evaluate the errors of the interpolation methods by kriging, inverse distance and normal distance from the data of EC, MO and soil pH. The experiment was carried out in the city of Candói - PR, where two areas were sampled, the data were collected by contact sensor, which was configured for a collection of 150 points per hectare for electrical conductivity and organic matter, and for potential the collection frequency was 15 points per hectare, the equipment was coupled in a tractor operated at a speed of 8 km h-1 with parallel passes of 20 m. Variographic analysis, cross-validation and mapping were performed. The smallest interpolation errors or jack knifing for CE, MO and pH were presented by the inverse distance interpolation method for the T2 field, and in T1 field the Kriging method obtained the lowest errors for pH. It was concluded that distance from the samplings was adequate and the kriging and the inverse of the distance were more efficient than the normal distance. It was verified that the higher the elevation power, both for the inverse distance and the normal distance method, the errors increase and also the degree of contagiousness.Keywords: geostatistics, Veris sensor, spatial variability.
Swine production systems contribute to emission of greenhouse gases (CO2, N2O, and CH4) and ammonia (NH3) into the atmosphere. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate methods for determining the emissions of ammonia and greenhouse gases (GHG) in a commercial swine production unit with natural ventilation during the finishing phase. The concentrations of gases in the air were measured using a gas analyzer (INNOVA 1412), and the flow emission was calculated by considering the ventilation rate and the differences in gas concentration between the interior and exterior of the installation. The results showed that the emission flow obtained via the simplified method in [g per swine h-1] was 2.689, 0.30, 4.39, 13.55, and 3.273 for CO2, N2O, CH4, NH3, and water vapor, respectively. The flow obtained using the continuous method in [g per swine h-1] was 574, 0.67, 19.50, 5.84, and 7.2 for CO2, N2O, CH4, NH3, and water vapor, respectively. The proposed simplified method was highly accurate for estimating GHG emissions from swine production systems with natural ventilation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.