No abstract

Understanding the most efficacious products will allow clinicians to best communicate to patients and consumers the safest products on the market to reduce adverse events, including microbial keratitis, during contact lens use.

Acanthamoeba keratitis is a serious ocular infection which is challenging to treat and can lead to blindness. While this pathogen is ubiquitous and can contaminate contact lenses after contact with water, its habits remain elusive. Understanding this organism’s natural behavior will better inform us on how Acanthamoeba colonize contact lens care systems. Acanthamoeba trophozoites were allowed to adhere to either a glass coverslip or non-nutrient agar (NNA) within a flow cell with nutrients (Escherichia coli or an axenic culture medium (AC6)) or without nutrients (Ringer’s solution). Images were taken once every 24 s over 12 h and compiled, and videos were analyzed using ImageJ Trackmate software. Acanthamoeba maintained continuous movement for the entire 12 h period. ATCC 50370 had limited differences between conditions and surfaces throughout the experiment. Nutrient differences had a noticeable impact for ATCC 30461, where E. coli resulted in the highest total distance and speed during the early periods of the experiment but had the lowest total distance and speed by 12 h. The Ringer’s and AC6 conditions were the most similar between strains, while Acanthamoeba in the E. coli and NNA conditions demonstrated significant differences between strains (p < 0.05). These results indicate that quantifiable visual tracking of Acanthamoeba may be a novel and robust method for identifying the movement of Acanthamoeba in relation to contact lens care products. The present study indicates that Acanthamoeba can undertake sustained movement for at least 12 h with and without nutrients, on both rough and smooth surfaces, and that different strains have divergent behavior.

IntroductionAcanthamoeba keratitis is often caused when Acanthamoeba contaminate contact lenses and infect the cornea. Acanthamoeba is pervasive in the environment as a motile, foraging trophozoite or biocide-resistant and persistent cyst. As contact lens contamination is a potential first step in infection, we studied Acanthamoeba’s behavior and interactions on different contact lens materials. We hypothesized that contact lenses may induce aggregation, which is a precursor to encystment, and that aggregated encystment would be more difficult to disinfect than motile trophozoites.MethodsSix clinically and/or scientifically relevant strains of Acanthamoeba (ATCC 30010, ATCC 30461, ATCC 50370, ATCC 50702, ATCC 50703, and ATCC PRA-115) were investigated on seven different common silicone hydrogel contact lenses, and a no-lens control, for aggregation and encystment for 72 h. Cell count and size were used to determine aggregation, and fluorescent staining was used to understand encystment. RNA seq was performed to describe the genome of Acanthamoeba which was individually motile or aggregated on different lens materials. Disinfection efficacy using three common multi-purpose solutions was calculated to describe the potential disinfection resistance of trophozoites, individual cysts, or spheroids.ResultsAcanthamoeba trophozoites of all strains examined demonstrated significantly more aggregation on specific contact lens materials than others, or the no-lens control. Fluorescent staining demonstrated encystment in as little as 4 hours on contact lens materials, which is substantially faster than previously reported in natural or laboratory settings. Gene expression profiles corroborated encystment, with significantly differentially expressed pathways involving actin arrangement and membrane complexes. High disinfection resistance of cysts and spheroids with multi-purpose solutions was observed.DiscussionAggregation/encystment is a protective mechanism which may enable Acanthamoeba to be more disinfection resistant than individual trophozoites. This study demonstrates that some contact lens materials promote Acanthamoeba aggregation and encystment, and Acanthamoeba spheroids obstruct multi-purpose solutions from disinfecting Acanthamoeba.

SIGNIFICANCE This investigation examines the effectiveness of several common contact lens solutions in the disinfection of Acanthamoeba , which causes a serious eye infection most often resulting from dysfunctional or improper use of contact lens products. PURPOSE Acanthamoeba keratitis is an eye infection caused by a free-living amoeba, which can lead to extensive corneal damage and frequently blindness. Acanthamoeba keratitis is linked with contact lens use combined with noncompliance with contact lens care cleaning regimens. The patient's choice and use of multipurpose solutions (MPSs) continue to be a risk factor for Acanthamoeba keratitis. Thus, it is critical that the Acanthamoeba disinfection efficacy of the popular MPSs be determined. Here we compare the efficacy of seven major MPSs on the global market. METHODS Using standard methods of Acanthamoeba disinfection and quantification, Acanthamoeba ATCC 30461, 30868, 50370, and 50676 trophozoites were inoculated into each MPS and held for the manufacturer's recommended disinfection time. Acanthamoeba recovery plates were incubated for 14 days, after which positive wells were identified and cell concentrations determined using the 50% endpoint method. RESULTS Members of the OPTI-FREE products (Express, Replenish, and Puremoist [Alcon, Fort Worth, TX]) demonstrated significantly higher percentages of antimicrobial activity compared with the renu Advanced Formula (Bausch + Lomb, Rochester, NY), Biotrue (Bausch + Lomb), Acuvue RevitaLens (Johnson & Johnson, Santa Ana, CA), and Lite products (Cooper Vision, Scottsville, NY) for four of the trophozoite strains tested. CONCLUSIONS Many of the popular MPS biocides maintain little or no antimicrobial activity against Acanthamoeba trophozoites, and the number of biocides in an MPS does not necessarily indicate its antimicrobial activity.

ObjectiveSight-threatening infections can be caused by pathogenic micro-organisms colonising the cornea, leading to microbial keratitis (MK). These micro-organisms can be introduced to the eye via improper contact lens use and care. MK can also result from ineffective contact lens care solutions (CLCs), even if the patient is following best practice guidelines. Therefore, it is critical to understand the differences between the effectiveness of popular CLCs on the global market.Methods and analysisFollowing the International Standards Organisation standards 14 729 and 18259, bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus), fungi (Candida albicans, Fusarium strains) and Acanthamoeba strains were inoculated into each CLC with and without contact lenses, and held for the manufacturer’s stated disinfection time. Plate counts were conducted to determine the number of surviving micro-organisms.ResultsAll CLCs examined met the primary log reduction criteria during stand-alone testing for Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Candida and Fusarium. renu Multiplus, All Clean Soft, and Kombilösung Super did not meet the primary criteria when challenged with Serratia. Only OPTI-FREE Express exceeded 4 log reduction for both strains of Acanthamoeba tested. We noted a substantial reduction in disinfection efficacy when CLCs were challenged with Fusarium in the presence of lenses and cases versus stand-alone testing. OPTI-FREE Express demonstrated significantly less net log reduction loss than the other four CLCs tested.ConclusionOf the popular CLCs on the global market, the product which relies on dual biocides polyquaternium-1 and myristamidopropyl dimethylamine demonstrated the highest disinfection efficacy in microbial disinfection challenges in the absence and presence of contact lenses.