Rituximab improves outcome for patients with systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and has therefore become a standard component of the treatment of this disease. However, it is unclear whether rituximab is efficacious in patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), a rare DLBCL variant, also. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of rituximab on the complete response (CR) rate after chemotherapy with methotrexate (MTX) and ifosfamide (IFO) of patients with PCNSL. This is a retrospective, observational, single-center trial analyzing 36 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, CD-20-positive PCNSL who were treated primarily with chemotherapy between March 2007 and December 2010. We compared 19 patients who were treated with MTX and IFO with 17 patients who were treated with the same regimen plus rituximab. The addition of rituximab to MTX and IFO was correlated with a significant increase in the CR rate (100.0 vs. 68.4 %, p = 0.02). Furthermore, six-month progression-free survival was significantly higher for the rituximab group (94.1 vs. 63.2 %, p = 0.04). Toxicity did not differ significantly between the groups. Our results indicate that rituximab might be efficacious in the treatment of PCNSL and support addition of this drug to current treatment protocols until data from randomized controlled trials becomes available. Immunochemotherapy with MTX, IFO, and rituximab seems to have excellent activity as induction chemotherapy and should be further tested in prospective trials.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the pathological features of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) with papillary RCC (pRCC) and further differentiate type I and II pRCC as independent prognosticators for survival.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
From September 1994 to February 2007 557 RCCs were treated and reviewed. All patients underwent radical nephrectomy or nephron‐sparing surgery. We reviewed patient data and correlated RCC subtypes to tumour size, pathological stage, nuclear grade, and 5‐year cancer‐specific survival (CSS). pRCC was re‐evaluated in to type I and II. The 2002 Tumour‐Node‐Metastasis and Fuhrman classifications were used.
RESULTS
In all, 391 (70%) patients had ccRCC, 96 (17%) had pRCC, 34 (6%) had chromophobe RCC, seven (1%) had ductus Bellini RCC and 29 (5%) had unclassified RCC. Upon re‐evaluation 34 patients had type I pRCC and 62 had type II. The pRCCs were significantly smaller than the ccRCCs, at a mean (sd) of 4.5 (2.5) cm vs 5 (2.9) cm (P = 0.013), and multifocal (25% vs 12%, P = 0.001). Whereas patients with ccRCC had significantly more primary metastases (12% vs 3%, P = 0.014). The mean (sd) follow‐up was 42.3 (41.4) months. The 5‐year CSS for M0 patients was 84% for ccRCC and 90% for pRCC (P = 0.573). At multivariate analyses predictors for 5‐year CSS were only tumour size (hazard ratio, HR 2.6, P < 0.001), pathological stage (HR 3.9, P < 0.001) and nuclear grade (HR 2.7, P < 0.001). The type I and II pRCCs had significantly different lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and 5‐year CSS rates (94% vs 74%, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS
The ccRCCs were significantly larger at diagnosis than the pRCCs. The histological subtype (pRCC vs ccRCC) had no impact on the 5‐year CSS in multivariate analyses. The type I and II pRCCs had similar histopathological features except for a significant difference in LVI. However, the 5‐year CSS was significantly different in type I and II pRCC.
An example of the rare Rh gene complex C^w cDe was deduced from an apparent
mother-child exclusion. Fortunate segregation in a 3-generation family shows the rare gene
complex produces D and e as well as C^w and c antigen.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.