Background
There is a growing interest in the rapid genotypic identification of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). In routine diagnostics, we detected multiple KPC-positive Escherichia coli (KPC-Ec) with discordant phenotypic meropenem susceptibility from a single patient’s blood cultures, which prompted a more thorough investigation.
Objectives
We investigated the potential clinical relevance of, and the mechanism behind, discordant phenotypic and genotypic meropenem susceptibility in KPC-Ec.
Methods
WGS was used to perform a comparative analysis of the isolates’ genetic characteristics and their blaKPC-2 locus. Expression of blaKPC-2 was determined by quantitative PCR and the potency of meropenem hydrolysis was determined using a semi-quantitative carbapenem inactivation method. An in vivo infection assay using Galleria mellonella was performed to assess the potential clinical relevance of KPC expression in E. coli.
Results
Despite the presence of blaKPC-2, three of five isolates were susceptible to meropenem (MICVITEK2 ≤ 0.25 mg/L), while two isolates were resistant (MICVITEK2 ≥ 16 mg/L). The isolates with high MICs had significantly higher blaKPC-2 expression, which corresponds to phenotypic meropenem inactivation. The genetic environment of blaKPC-2, which may impact KPC production, was identical in all isolates. In vivo infection assay with G. mellonella suggested that meropenem was effective in reducing mortality following infection with low-expressing KPC-Ec.
Conclusions
Our findings clearly highlight a limitation of genotypic AMR prediction for blaKPC. For the time being, genotypic AMR prediction requires additional analysis for accurate antibiotic therapy decision-making.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.