Les trois études présentées concernent le développement et la validation d'un questionnaire permettant de mesurer les perceptions de compétence, d'autonomie et d'appartenance sociale en contexte sportif. E. L. Deci et R. M. Ryan (1985) postulent que le comportement intrinsèquement motivé est associé à la satisfaction des besoins fondamentaux d'autonomie, de compétence et d'appartenance sociale. Les analyses factorielles exploratoire (É tude 1) et confirmatoire (É tude 2) ont été réalisées chez des sportifs français. Les résultats obtenus attestent d'une consistance interne satisfaisante et confirment la structure tridimensionnelle de cet outil. De plus, la validité de construit de cette échelle de mesure a également été confirmée (É tude 3). Les résultats de cette troisième étude ont montré que les perceptions de compétence, d'autonomie et d'appartenance sociale étaient positivement associées à la motivation intrinsèque chez les sportifs.

No abstract

This study systematically reviewed the literature on the emotional processes associated with performance in team contact sports. To consider the entire emotional spectrum, Lazarus’s (1999) cognitive motivational relational theory was used as a guiding framework. An electronic search of the literature identified 48 of 5,079 papers as relevant. Anxiety and anger were found to be the most common emotions studied, potentially due to the combative nature of team contact sports. The influence of group processes on emotional experiences was also prominent. The findings highlight the need to increase awareness of the emotional experience in team contact sports and to develop emotion-specific regulation strategies. Recommendations for future research include exploring other emotions that might emerge from situations related to collisions (e.g., fright) and emotions related to relationships with teammates (e.g., guilt and compassion).

Usage of any items from the University of Cumbria's institutional repository 'Insight' must conform to the following fair usage guidelines.Any item and its associated metadata held in the University of Cumbria's institutional repository Insight (unless stated otherwise on the metadata record) may be copied, displayed or performed, and stored in line with the JISC fair dealing guidelines (available here) for educational and not-for-profit activities provided that• the authors, title and full bibliographic details of the item are cited clearly when any part of the work is referred to verbally or in the written form• a hyperlink/URL to the original Insight record of that item is included in any citations of the work • the content is not changed in any way• all files required for usage of the item are kept together with the main item file. You may not• sell any part of an item• refer to any part of an item without citation • amend any item or contextualise it in a way that will impugn the creator's reputation• remove or alter the copyright statement on an item.The full policy can be found here. Alternatively contact the University of Cumbria Repository Editor by emailing insight@cumbria.ac.uk. 1 Interpersonal emotion regulation in team sport:Mechanisms and reasons to regulate teammates' emotions examined 2 Abstract 11The interpersonal dimension of emotion regulation in the field of sport has lately received 12 a burgeoning interest. Nevertheless, how and why athletes regulate their teammates' 13 emotions in competitive setting remains unclear. Across two studies within a team sport 14 context, we uncovered athletes' mechanisms for, and reasons to regulate teammates' 15 emotions during competition. In Study 1, we investigated how rugby (n = 22 males) 16 players' emotions were self-and interpersonally regulated during games. Findings revealed 17 the emergence of a continuum of self-involvement in the regulatory processes, wherein two 18 forms of emotion regulation co-existed: self-regulation (total self-involvement) and 19 interpersonal regulation, which included co-regulation (partial self-involvement; 20 regulation with others) and extrinsic regulation (no self-involvement; regulation by/of 21 others). In Study 2, we examined the motives that lead rugby (n = 30 males) players to use 22 interpersonal extrinsic regulation strategies during games. Interview data indicated that 23 players regulated teammates' emotions for altruistic reasons (to help a teammate), egoistic 24 reasons (for one's own benefits), or both. Overall, our findings further knowledge to better 25 understand interpersonal emotion regulation within competitive team sport contexts. From 26 an applied perspective, findings highlight the role that both individual goals and ego 27 involvement may play in optimising efficient interpersonal regulation during competition 28 at team level. 29

To cite this version:Nadine Debois, Aurélie Ledon, Cécile Argiolas, Elisabeth Rosnet. A lifespan perspective on transitions during a top sports career : A case of an elite female fencer. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, Elsevier, 2012, 13 (5), pp