Placental dysfunction is involved in a group of obstetrical conditions including preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and placental abruption. Their timely and accurate recognition is often a challenge since diagnostic criteria are still based on nonspecific signs and symptoms. The discovering of the role of angiogenic-related factors (sFlt-1/PlGF) in the underlying pathophysiology of placental dysfunction, taking into account that angiogenesis-related biomarkers are not specific to any particular placental insufficiency-related disease, has marked an important step for improving their early diagnosis and prognosis assessment. However, sFlt-1/PlGF has not been yet established as a part of most guidelines. We will review the current evidence on the clinical utility of sFlt-1/PlGF and propose a new protocol for its clinical integration.
Objective: To compare vaginal delivery rate and perinatal outcomes of fetuses with late-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) undergoing labor induction, depending on the method for cervical ripening (dinoprostone vs. Foley balloon). Material and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 148 consecutive singleton gestations diagnosed with stage I late-onset FGR and Bishop score < 7, in which labor induction was indicated at ≥37 + 0 weeks. Before January 2016, cervical ripening was achieved with 10 mg of vaginal dinoprostone (n = 77) and afterwards with Foley balloon (n = 71). Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association between mode of delivery and induction method. Results: Foley balloon had lower percentages of uterine tachysystole with fetal repercussion (4.2 vs. 16.9%, p = 0.01) and cesarean sections for suspected fetal distress (7.0 vs. 26.0%, p < 0.01) when compared to dinoprostone. Lower percentages of cesarean sections were found in the Foley balloon group (15.5 vs. 37.7%, p < 0.01). The odds ratio and adjusted odds ratio of cesarean section with dinoprostone were of 3.3 and 4.4, respectively. Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity were null in both groups. Conclusion: The use of Foley balloon resulted in a higher percentage of vaginal delivery compared to dinoprostone, with a favorable safety profile in both groups.
Objective: The aim of this work was to identify independent risk factors influencing the achievement of vaginal delivery among women undergoing labor induction for late-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 201 singleton pregnancies with late-onset FGR (diagnosed > 32 + 0 weeks) that required labor induction with cervical ripening from 37 + 0 weeks, either with dinoprostone (from 2014 to 2015) or Foley balloon (from 2016 to 2018). Independent factors for successful vaginal delivery were identified. A prediction model of vaginal delivery with the identified factors was made using logistic regression and bootstrapping with 1,000 re-samples performed for bias correction. Results: Perinatal results were more favorable in the vaginal delivery group, with significantly lower neonatal admission rates (4.0 vs. 13.7%) and lower composite neonatal morbidity (4.0 vs. 15.7%). The labor induction method (Foley balloon), higher cerebro-pla-cental ratio, lower pre-gestational BMI, and absence of preeclampsia were identified as independent factors associated to vaginal delivery. The area under the curve of the model was of 0.75 (95% CI 0.70-0.79). Conclusions: The use of a Foley balloon is the only modifiable risk factor to improve the chances of vaginal delivery when attempting induction of labor in singleton pregnancies with late-onset FGR.
(Abstracted from Fetal Diagn Ther 2019;46(1):67–74)
Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with a higher risk of perinatal complications and death, as well as neurodevelopmental delay. Once FGR is diagnosed, delivery is the main therapeutic measure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.