Families are places where everyone in the family feels safe and comfortable from acts o violence, but in reality violence also accurs whitin the family. The enactment of Law No. 23 of 2004 on the abolition of domestic violence (hereinafter referred to as the Law of Domestic Violence) aims to prevent all forms of domestic violence, protect domestic violence victims, prosecute domestic violence perpetrators, and maintain wholeness harmonious and prosperous households. In handling it is sometimes resolved peacefully. This raises the question of whether the Law on Elimination of Domestic Violence has guaranteed the settlement of Domestic Violence according to its objectives? All forms of violence against women and children constitute a violation of human rights, so it is necessary to be protected by their dignity and dignity and guaranteed their right to life in accordance with their nature and nature without discrimination. The Criminal Act contained in Article 5 of the Act states that prohibited violence is physical violence, psychological violence, sexual violence, or neglect of the household. Many cases of domestic violence are reported but not a few are repealed by the victim for various reasons, such as still loving the perpetrator, and the perpetrator is the breadwinner in the household. The resolution of cases of domestic violence is also up to the court's decision, but this certainly brings the consequences of the objective of the Law on Elimination of Domestic Violence. Despite all forms of prevention of domestic violence, protecting the victim, prosecuting the perpetrator is reached but if the case is passed on to the court decision whether the goal of maintaining a harmonious and prosperous household unity can be achieved. The resolution of domestic violence requires the wisdom of the Law Enforcers (Police, Prosecutors, Judges).
Laporan dan aduan merupakan hal yang berbeda, dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana ada delik biasa dan delik aduan, delik biasa dapat dilaporkan oleh semua orang namun dalam delik aduan tidak dapat diadukan semua orang, dalam perkara pidana Nomor 6/Pid.B/2018/PN.Drh yang disidangkan pada Pengadilan Negeri Dataran Hunipopu Seram Bagian Barat, saudara HW didakwakan Pasal 310 ayat (1) Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana atas adulan yang dilakukan oleh AA. Tujuan penulisan ini untuk mengetahui apa akibat hukum jika penaganan delik aduan dengan aduan yang tidak sah, metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitan hukum yuridis normatif, hasil dari pembahasan diketahui saudara saksi AA tidak mengadukan langsung perbuatan HW namun lewat pengacara, namun dalam aduan tersebut pengacara tidak mencantumkan surat kuasa dari AA, tentunya surat kuasa tersebut cacat, dan fakta persidangan tidak ada dasar aduan yaitu surat kuasa dari korban kepada pengacara, akibat hukumnya adalah hakim menolak tuntutan jaksa (neit ontvankelijk verklaring van het OM) atau H W Alias H untuk dapat dituntut pidana seharusnya gugur atau putusan lepas dari tuntutan hukum (ontslag van rechtsvervolging) hal ini dapat dilihat dalam Pasal 319 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Kesimpulannya dalam tindak pidana yang dikualifikasinya delik aduan, wajib ada aduan jika tidak ada maka tuntutan jaksa ditolak atau putusan pengadilan lepas dari tuntutan hukum.
Laporan dan aduan merupakan hal yang berbeda, dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana ada delik biasa dan delik aduan, delik biasa dapat dilaporkan oleh semua orang namun dalam delik aduan tidak dapat diadukan semua orang, dalam perkara pidana Nomor 6/Pid.B/2018/PN.Drh yang disidangkan pada Pengadilan Negeri Dataran Hunipopu Seram Bagian Barat, saudara HW didakwakan Pasal 310 ayat (1) Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana atas adulan yang dilakukan oleh AA. Tujuan penulisan ini untuk mengetahui apa akibat hukum jika penaganan delik aduan dengan aduan yang tidak sah, metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitan hukum yuridis normatif, hasil dari pembahasan diketahui saudara saksi AA tidak mengadukan langsung perbuatan HW namun lewat pengacara, namun dalam aduan tersebut pengacara tidak mencantumkan surat kuasa dari AA, tentunya surat kuasa tersebut cacat, dan fakta persidangan tidak ada dasar aduan yaitu surat kuasa dari korban kepada pengacara, akibat hukumnya adalah hakim menolak tuntutan jaksa (neit ontvankelijk verklaring van het OM) atau H W Alias H untuk dapat dituntut pidana seharusnya gugur atau putusan lepas dari tuntutan hukum (ontslag van rechtsvervolging) hal ini dapat dilihat dalam Pasal 319 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Kesimpulannya dalam tindak pidana yang dikualifikasinya delik aduan, wajib ada aduan jika tidak ada maka tuntutan jaksa ditolak atau putusan pengadilan lepas dari tuntutan hukum.
In reality, specifically for the principle of the best interests of children who are accommodated in the Aanak Criminal Justice System Act not yet maximized to be applied in cases of children who are dealing with the law both against children as perpetrators and children as victims, which in the settlement of losses suffered by children as a victim of a criminal offense, it has not been concretely felt. Based on the explanation above, the problem that the writer wants to analyze is Is the settlement of the case of children considering the best interests of the child as the perpetrator and the child as the victim? Constraints in fulfilling the best interests principle for children as perpetrators and children as victims. The research method used is a type of empirical juridical research. The results showed that the fulfillment of the best interests of children in the case of children in conflict with the law must be supported by all relevant stakeholders so that children's rights can be implemented at all stages of the case inspection in accordance with the mandate of the Aanak Criminal Justice System Law and the Law related, it is not enough there, the fulfillment of the best interests must also continue to be supported back to the community. Obstacles in fulfilling the best interests of cases of children in conflict with the law, namely the lack of investigators for the protection of women and children, inadequate facilities or infrastructure, human resources both for women and children protection investigators and for assisting victims who are not yet qualified, lack of budget in case settlement children in conflict with the law.
Introduction: The judge's legal considerations are one aspect of realizing the value of a judge's decision that contains justice and contains legal certainty. In deciding a case the judge must consider the juridical, sociological and philosophical truths.Purposes of the Research: Analyze and discuss the judges legal considerations against the mitigating testimony based on the decision of the district cour No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb)”. analyze and discuss the imposition of sanctions against the crime of rapoe based on decision No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb)”. Methods of the Research: This research uses the juridical normative method by using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach.Results of the Research: The results showed that the judge’s leal considerations in the decision No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb resulted in the defendant bein acquitted because of the weak evidence presented by the public prosecutor, namely there were no eye witnesses, expert witnesses and also Visum et Repertum which were not used as evidence. On the other hand, the defendant has a mitigating witness, where mitigating facts greatly influence the judgge in imposing sancsions. Based on this decision the judge that the intercourse was consesual, so the judge handed down an acquittal against the defendant.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.