Low salinity waterflood (LSF) is a promising improved oil recovery (IOR) technology. Although, it has been demonstrated that LSF is an efficient IOR method for many sandstone reservoirs, the potential of LSF in carbonate reservoirs is still not well-established as only a limited number of successful coreflood experiments are available in the literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the oil recovery improvement by LSF in carbonate reservoirs by performing coreflood experiments.This paper proposes an experimental approach to qualitatively evaluate the potential of LSF to improve oil recovery and alter the rock wettability during coreflood experiments. The corefloods were conducted on core plugs from two Middle Eastern carbonate reservoirs with a wide variation of rock properties and reservoir conditions. Seawater and several dilutions of formation brine and seawater were flooded in the tertiary mode to evaluate their impacts on oil recovery compared to formation brine injection. In addition, a geochemical study was performed using PHREEQC software to assess the potential of calcite dissolution by LSF.The experimental results confirmed that lowering the water salinity can alter the rock wettability towards more water-wet, causing improvement of oil recovery in tertiary waterflood in plugs from the two reservoirs. Furthermore, seawater is more favorable for improved oil recovery than formation brine as injection of seawater after formation brine resulted in extra oil production. This demonstrates that the brine composition plays an important role during waterflooding in carbonate reservoirs, and not only the brine salinity. It was also observed that oil recovery can be improved by injection of brines that cannot dissolve calcite based on the geochemical modeling study. This implies that calcite dissolution is not the dominant mechanism of IOR by LSF.To conclude, this paper demonstrates that low-salinity waterflood has a good potential as an IOR technology in carbonate reservoirs. In addition, the proposed experimental approach ensures the verification of LSF effect, either it is positive or negative. However, more work is required to further explore the most influential parameters affecting LSF response and explain the dominant mechanisms.
Low-salinity waterflood (LSF) is a promising improved-oil-recovery (IOR) technology. Although, it was demonstrated that LSF is an efficient IOR method for many sandstone reservoirs, the potential of LSF in carbonate reservoirs is still not well-established because only a limited number of successful coreflood experiments are available in the literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the oil-recovery improvement by LSF in carbonate reservoirs by performing coreflood experiments.This paper proposes an experimental approach to qualitatively evaluate the potential of LSF to improve oil recovery and alter the rock wettability during coreflood experiments. The corefloods were conducted on core plugs from two Middle Eastern carbonate reservoirs with a wide variation of rock properties and reservoir conditions. Seawater (SW) and several dilutions of formation brine and SW were flooded in the tertiary mode to evaluate their impacts on oil recovery compared with formation-brine injection. In addition, a geochemical study was performed with PHREEQC software (Parkhurst and Appelo 1999) to assess the potential of calcite dissolution by LSF.The experimental results confirmed that lowering the water salinity can alter the rock wettability toward more water-wet, causing improvement of oil recovery in tertiary waterflood in plugs from the two reservoirs. Furthermore, SW is more-favorable for improved oil recovery than formation brine because injection of SW after formation brine resulted in extra oil production. This demonstrates that the brine composition plays an important role during waterflooding in carbonate reservoirs, and not only the brine salinity. It was also observed that oil recovery can be improved by injection of brines that cannot dissolve calcite on the basis of the geochemical modeling study. This implies that calcite dissolution is not the dominant mechanism of IOR by LSF.To conclude, this paper demonstrates that LSF has a good potential as an IOR technology in carbonate reservoirs. In addition, the proposed experimental approach ensures the verification of LSF effect, either it is positive or negative. However, further research is required to explore the optimum salinity and composition and the most-influential parameters affecting LSF response.
Several laboratory tests have already demonstrated the potential of lowering/manipulating the injected brine salinity and composition to improve oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs. However, laboratory SCAL tests are still required to screen low salinity waterflood (LSF) for a particular field to (i) ensure that there is LSF response in the studied rock/oil/brine system, (ii) find the optimal brine salinity, (iii) extract relative permeability curves to be used in the reservoir simulation model and quantify the benefit of LSF and (iv) examine the compatibility of injected brine with formation brine and rock to de-risk any potential formation damage or scaling. This paper presents an extensive LSF SCAL study for one of the carbonate reservoirs and the numerical interpretation of the tests. The experiments were performed at reservoir conditions using representative reservoir core plugs, crude oil and synthetic brines. The rock was characterized using different measurements and techniques such as porosity, permeability, semi-quantitative X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and mercury intrusion capillary pressure (MICP). The characterization work showed that the plugs can be classified into two groups (uni-modal and bi-modal) based on porosity/permeability correlation and pore throat size distribution. The SCAL experiments were divided in two categories. Firstly, spontaneous imbibition and qualitative unsteady-state (USS) experiments were performed to demonstrate the effect of low salinity brines. In addition, these experiments helped to screen different brines (seawater and different dilutions of seawater) in order to choose the optimal brine composition that showed the most promising effect. Secondly, quantitative unsteady-state (USS) experiments were conducted and modeled using numerical simulation to extract relative permeability curves for high salinity and low salinity brines by history-matching production and pressure data. Moreover, the pressure drop was monitored during all tests to evaluate any risk of formation damage. The main conclusions of the study: 1- The spontaneous imbibition and qualitative USS experiments showed extra oil production due to wettability alteration when switching from formation brine to seawater or diluted seawater subsequently, 2- Oil recovery by LSF can be maximized by injection of brine at a certain salinity threshold, at which lowering the brines salinity further may not lead to additional recovery improvement, 3- The LSF effect and optimal brine salinity varied in different layers of the reservoir, 4- The quantitative USS showed that LSF can improve the oil recovery factor by up to 7% at core scale compared to formation brine injection. This paper proves the potential of LSF to improve oil recovery in carbonate rock. However, the results demonstrate that the effect of LSF may vary in different layers within the same carbonate reservoir, which indicates that LSF effect is very dependent on the rock properties/mineralogy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.