Abstract:Low-salinity waterflood (LSF) is a promising improved-oil-recovery (IOR) technology. Although, it was demonstrated that LSF is an efficient IOR method for many sandstone reservoirs, the potential of LSF in carbonate reservoirs is still not well-established because only a limited number of successful coreflood experiments are available in the literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the oil-recovery improvement by LSF in carbonate reservoirs by performing coreflood experiments.This paper prop… Show more
“…It was first shown that either altering the brine composition or reducing the salinity of injected brine below that of the initial formation water can lead to additional oil recovery for Berea sandstone [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Such results attracted many oil and gas companies, such as British Petroleum [13][14][15][16][17][18][19], Shell [20][21][22][23][24][25][26], ExxonMobil [27,28], Schlumberger [29][30][31], TOTAL [32,33], and Statoil [34,35] to investigate and further explore the potential and applicability of low salinity waterflooding (LSW) for improved oil recovery. LSW, also known as designer waterflood, advanced ion management, and smart waterflooding, injects brine with controlled ionic concentration and composition (also known as smart water or dynamic water) into the well [17,20,27].…”
Carbonate rock reservoirs comprise approximately 60% of the world's oil and gas reserves. Complex flow mechanisms and strong adsorption of crude oil on carbonate formation surfaces can reduce hydrocarbon recovery of an oil-wet carbonate reservoir to as low as 10%. Low salinity waterflooding (LSW) has been confirmed as a promising technique to improve the oil recovery factor. However, the principal mechanism underpinning this recovery method is not fully understood, which poses a challenge toward designing the optimal salinity and ionic composition of any injection solution. In general, it is believed that there is more than one mechanism involved in LSW of carbonates; even though wettability alteration toward a more desirable state for oil to be recovered could be the main cause during LSW, how this alteration happens is still the subject of debate. This paper reviews different working conditions of LSW, previous studies, and field observations, alongside the proposed interfacial mechanisms which affect the colloidal interactions at oil-rock-brine interfaces. This paper provides a comprehensive review of studies on LSW in carbonate formation and further analyzes the latest achievements of LSW application in carbonates, which helps to better understand the challenges involved in these complicated multicomponent systems and potentially benefits the oil production industry.
“…It was first shown that either altering the brine composition or reducing the salinity of injected brine below that of the initial formation water can lead to additional oil recovery for Berea sandstone [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Such results attracted many oil and gas companies, such as British Petroleum [13][14][15][16][17][18][19], Shell [20][21][22][23][24][25][26], ExxonMobil [27,28], Schlumberger [29][30][31], TOTAL [32,33], and Statoil [34,35] to investigate and further explore the potential and applicability of low salinity waterflooding (LSW) for improved oil recovery. LSW, also known as designer waterflood, advanced ion management, and smart waterflooding, injects brine with controlled ionic concentration and composition (also known as smart water or dynamic water) into the well [17,20,27].…”
Carbonate rock reservoirs comprise approximately 60% of the world's oil and gas reserves. Complex flow mechanisms and strong adsorption of crude oil on carbonate formation surfaces can reduce hydrocarbon recovery of an oil-wet carbonate reservoir to as low as 10%. Low salinity waterflooding (LSW) has been confirmed as a promising technique to improve the oil recovery factor. However, the principal mechanism underpinning this recovery method is not fully understood, which poses a challenge toward designing the optimal salinity and ionic composition of any injection solution. In general, it is believed that there is more than one mechanism involved in LSW of carbonates; even though wettability alteration toward a more desirable state for oil to be recovered could be the main cause during LSW, how this alteration happens is still the subject of debate. This paper reviews different working conditions of LSW, previous studies, and field observations, alongside the proposed interfacial mechanisms which affect the colloidal interactions at oil-rock-brine interfaces. This paper provides a comprehensive review of studies on LSW in carbonate formation and further analyzes the latest achievements of LSW application in carbonates, which helps to better understand the challenges involved in these complicated multicomponent systems and potentially benefits the oil production industry.
“…Most common are methods based on water injection (Goolsby and Anderson 1964;Rausch and Beaver 1964;Hussain et al 2013;Esmaeili and Maaref 2019), for which different strategies are followed: adding alkali, polymers, surfactants or nanoparticles, or adjusting the ion composition. The latter, also known as Smart Water Flooding (SWF) is a relatively recent technique which has been reported to give higher yields than conventional (sea) water injection, (Bernard 1967) in both sandstone (Tang and Morrow 1999;Morrow and Buckley 2011) and carbonate (Gupta et al 2011;Yousef et al 2011;Shehata et al 2014;Nasralla et al 2016Nasralla et al , 2018 reservoirs.…”
To enable the study of improved oil recovery (IOR) from carbonate rock via laboratory experiments at the pore scale, we have developed a novel microfluidic chip containing a 3D packed bed of calcite particles. The utilization of fluorescently labeled water phase enabled visualization up to 1-2 particle layers with confocal laser scanning microscopy. Porosity and residual oil saturation (ROS) in this space are quantified from image stacks in the depth direction (Z). To obtain reliable average ROS values, Z stacks are captured at various XY locations and sampled over several time-steps in the steady state. All image stacks are binarized using Otsu's method, subsequent to automated corrections for imperfect illumination and Z-drifts of the microscope stage. Low salinity IOR was mimicked using a packed bed that was initially saturated with water and then with mineral oil. Steady state ROS values showed no significant dependence on capillary number (Ca) in the range from 6 × 10-7 to 2 × 10-5. In contrast, chemical modification of the pore space via adsorption of water-extracted crude oil components yielded significantly higher ROS values, in agreement with a more oil-wet porous medium. These results indicate a good potential for using packed beds on a chip as an efficient screening tool for the optimization and development of different IOR methods.
“…In surveys conducted by Austad et al, the presence of sulfate ions as catalysts showed to make a difference in wettability regarding cationic surfactants [26]. Subsequently, Zhang and Austad [27] suggested the sulfate ion as the only adequate consideration to improve change of wettability in carbonate formations denying the use of surface-active agents especially avoiding high expense of application [28][29][30]. Published experimental data suggests that desorption of acidic oil components from rock surfaces make carbonate rocks more water-wet.…”
Water injection has been known as a conventional approach employed for years in order to achieve higher oil recovery from oil reservoirs. Since the last decade many researchers conducted on the water injection assessment suggested that low salinity water flooding can be an effective flooding mechanism and it can be used as an enhanced oil recovery method. Several examinations were conducted to identify governing mechanisms entailed in oil extraction and the effect of salinity and different types of ionic contents contained in Formation Water (FW) and injected fluid. This study is dedicated to address the influence of salinity and different types of ionic contents contained in formation water and injected fluid on incremental oil recovery. For this purpose, fluid–fluid and rock–fluid interaction were investigated especially for evaluating the effect of calcium ions in the formation water and sulfate ions in the injected water. Several experiments were carried out including core-flooding, contact angle, and imbibition tests. While former researchers concluded that reducing the salinity of injected water causing a decrease in ionic strength may lead to a greater oil recovery, in this research, we showed that these statements are not necessarily true. It was observed that existence of the high calcium concentration in the formation water would cause significant effect on wettability status of rocks and final oil recovery during low salinity water injection. This process is mainly due to rock wettability alteration. Wettability alteration mechanism in carbonate rocks is explained through interaction between rock and fluid composition. The results indicate the decisive role of calcium ions in the formation water at all stages from aging in oil to primary and secondary recovery. In addition to that, it was observed that more sulfate ion concentration in the injected water enhances rock wettability alteration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.