Autologous bone remains the gold standard bone substitute in clinical practice. Therefore, the microarchitecture of newly developed synthetic bone substitutes, which reflects the spatial distribution of materials in the scaffold, aims to recapitulate the natural bone microarchitecture. However, the natural bone microarchitecture is optimized to obtain a mechanically stable, lightweight structure adapted to the biomechanical loading situation. In the context of synthetic bone substitutes, the application of a Triply Periodic Minimum Surface (TPMS) algorithm can yield stable lightweight microarchitectures that, despite their demanding architectural complexity, can be produced by additive manufacturing. In this study, we applied the TPMS derivative Adaptive Density Minimal Surfaces (ADMS) algorithm to produce scaffolds from hydroxyapatite (HA) using a lithography-based layer-by-layer methodology and compared them with an established highly osteoconductive lattice microarchitecture. We characterized them for compression strength, osteoconductivity, and bone regeneration. The in vivo results, based on a rabbit calvaria defect model, showed that bony ingrowth into ADMS constructs as a measure of osteoconduction depended on minimal constriction as it limited the maximum apparent pore diameter in these scaffolds to 1.53 mm. Osteoconduction decreased significantly at a diameter of 1.76 mm. The most suitable ADMS microarchitecture was as osteoconductive as a highly osteoconductive orthogonal lattice microarchitecture in noncritical- and critical-size calvarial defects. However, the compression strength and microarchitectural integrity in vivo were significantly higher for scaffolds with their microarchitecture based on the ADMS algorithm when compared with high-connectivity lattice microarchitectures. Therefore, bone substitutes with high osteoconductivity can be designed with the advantages of the ADMS-based microarchitectures. As TPMS and ADMS microarchitectures are true lightweight structures optimized for high mechanical stability with a minimal amount of material, such microarchitectures appear most suitable for bone substitutes used in clinical settings to treat bone defects in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing sites.
Triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMSs) are found to be promising microarchitectures for bone substitutes owing to their low weight and superior mechanical characteristics. However, existing studies on their application are incomplete because they focus solely on biomechanical or in vitro aspects. Hardly any in vivo studies where different TPMS microarchitectures are compared have been reported. Therefore, we produced hydroxyapatite-based scaffolds with three types of TPMS microarchitectures, namely Diamond, Gyroid, and Primitive, and compared them with an established Lattice microarchitecture by mechanical testing, 3D-cell culture, and in vivo implantation. Common to all four microarchitectures was the minimal constriction of a sphere of 0.8 mm in diameter, which earlier was found superior in Lattice microarchitectures. Scanning by μCT revealed the precision and reproducibility of our printing method. The mechanical analysis showed significantly higher compression strength for Gyroid and Diamond samples compared with Primitive and Lattice. After in vitro culture with human bone marrow stromal cells in control or osteogenic medium, no differences between these microarchitectures were observed. However, from the TPMS microarchitectures, Diamond- and Gyroid-based scaffolds showed the highest bone ingrowth and bone-to-implant contact in vivo . Therefore, Diamond and Gyroid designs appear to be the most promising TPMS-type microarchitectures for scaffolds produced for bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Impact Statement Extensive bone defects require the application of bone grafts. To match the existing requirements, scaffolds based on triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS)–based microarchitectures could be used as bone substitutes. This work is dedicated to the investigation of mechanical and osteoconductive properties of TPMS-based scaffolds to determine the influencing factors on differences in their behavior and choose the most promising design to be used in bone tissue engineering.
The early phase of bone healing is a complex and poorly understood process. With additive manufacturing, we can generate a specific and customizable library of bone substitutes to explore this phase. In this study, we produced tricalcium phosphate-based scaffolds with microarchitectures composed of filaments of 0.50 mm in diameter, named Fil050G, and 1.25 mm named Fil125G, respectively. The implants were removed after only 10 days in vivo followed by RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and histological analysis. RNAseq results revealed upregulation of adaptive immune response, regulation of cell adhesion, and cell migration-related genes in both of our two constructs. However, significant overexpression of genes linked to angiogenesis, regulation of cell differentiation, ossification, and bone development was observed solely in Fil050G scaffolds. Moreover, quantitative immunohistochemistry of structures positive for laminin revealed a significantly higher number of blood vessels in Fil050G samples. Furthermore, µCT detected a higher amount of mineralized tissue in Fil050G samples suggesting a superior osteoconductive potential. Hence, different filament diameters and distances in bone substitutes significantly influence angiogenesis and regulation of cell differentiation involved in the early phase of bone regeneration, which precedes osteoconductivity and bony bridging seen in later phases and as consequence, impacts the overall clinical outcome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.