2023
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24066000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Scaffold Microarchitecture on Angiogenesis and Regulation of Cell Differentiation during the Early Phase of Bone Healing: A Transcriptomics and Histological Analysis

Abstract: The early phase of bone healing is a complex and poorly understood process. With additive manufacturing, we can generate a specific and customizable library of bone substitutes to explore this phase. In this study, we produced tricalcium phosphate-based scaffolds with microarchitectures composed of filaments of 0.50 mm in diameter, named Fil050G, and 1.25 mm named Fil125G, respectively. The implants were removed after only 10 days in vivo followed by RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and histological analysis. RNAseq re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both macro- and microporosities within a biomaterial play crucial roles in promoting osteogenesis and angiogenesis (Figure ). Larger macropores, with an average size exceeding 100 μm, facilitate osteogenesis, and macropores exceeding 500 μm facilitate angiogenesis. , …”
Section: Role Of Trabecular Microarchitecture In Scaffold Bioactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both macro- and microporosities within a biomaterial play crucial roles in promoting osteogenesis and angiogenesis (Figure ). Larger macropores, with an average size exceeding 100 μm, facilitate osteogenesis, and macropores exceeding 500 μm facilitate angiogenesis. , …”
Section: Role Of Trabecular Microarchitecture In Scaffold Bioactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings indicated that the phagocytosis of these degradation products spurred oxidative stress and nudged macrophages toward an inflammatory state (M1). In a different investigation, Guerrero et al evaluated two distinct types of bone substitute constructs for their application in the early phases of bone healing, using RNA-seq and histology as tools for comparison [102]. The results demonstrated that while both constructs exhibited robust expression of genes linked to cell adhesion, migration, and adaptive immune responses, one construct demonstrated elevated expression of genes involved with ossification, bone development, and angiogenesis.…”
Section: The Genetic Landscape In Organoids and 3d In Vitro Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%