OBJECTIVE:To describe the epidemiology of hospital inpatient falls, including characteristics of patients who fall, circumstances of falls, and fall-related injuries. DESIGN:Prospective descriptive study of inpatient falls. Data on patient characteristics, fall circumstances, and injury were collected through interviews with patients and/or nurses and review of adverse event reports and medical records. Fall rates and nurse staffing levels were compared by service. SETTING:A 1,300-bed urban academic hospital over 13 weeks. PATIENTS:All inpatient falls reported for medicine, cardiology, neurology, orthopedics, surgery, oncology, and women and infants services during the study period were included. Falls in the psychiatry service and falls during physical therapy sessions were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:A total of 183 patients fell during the study period. The average age of patients who fell was 63.4 years (range 17 to 96). Many falls were unassisted (79%) and occurred in the patient's room (85%), during the evening/overnight (59%), and during ambulation (19%). Half of the falls (50%) were elimination related, which was more common in patients over 65 years old (83% vs 48%; P < .001). Elimination-related falls increased the risk of fall-related injury (adjusted odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.3). The medicine and neurology services had the highest fall rates (both were 6.12 falls per 1,000 patient-days), and the highest patient to nurse ratios (6.5 and 5.3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Falls in the hospital affect young as well as older patients, are often unassisted, and involve eliminationrelated activities. Further studies are necessary to prevent hospital falls and reduce fall injury rates.

OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively analyze potential risk factors for falling in the hospital and describe the circumstances surrounding falls.DESIGN: Case-control study. Data on potential risk factors and circumstances of the falls were collected via interviews with patients and/ or nurses and review of adverse event reports, medical records, and nurse staffing records.SETTING: Large urban academic hospital.PATIENTS: Ninety-eight inpatients who fell and 318 controls matched on approximate length of stay until the index fall. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:In a multivariate model of patient-related, medication, and care-related variables, factors that were significantly associated with an increased risk of falling included: gait/balance deficit or lower extremity problem (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 9.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 41.0), confusion (aOR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.6 to 8.4), use of sedatives/hypnotics (aOR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.6 to 11.5), use of diabetes medications (aOR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.3 to 7.9), increasing patient-to-nurse ratio (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.0), and activity level of ''up with assistance'' compared with ''bathroom privileges'' (aOR, 8.7; 95% CI, 2.3 to 32.7). Urinary or stool frequency or incontinence was of borderline significance (aOR, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.99 to 5.6). Having one or more side rails raised was associated with a decreased risk of falling (aOR, 0.006; 95% CI, 0.001 to 0.024).CONCLUSIONS: Patient health status, especially abnormal gait or lower extremity problems, medications, as well as care-related factors, increase the risk of falling. Fall prevention programs should target patients with these risk factors and consider using frequently scheduled mobilization and toileting, and minimizing use of medications related to falling. Due to the risk of significant injury and the increased cost, reduction of falls in hospitals is a major priority for hospital quality and patient safety. While falls have been relatively well studied in community and nursing home settings, less is known about the prevention of hospital falls. Previous research has identified risk factors for falling in the hospital, including impaired balance or gait, history of falling, increasing age, impaired cognition, depression, dizziness or vertigo, orthostatic hypotension, visual impairment, urinary frequency, nocturia, incontinence, specific diagnoses, and use of certain medications, such as benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, and sedatives. 10,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Yet comparative studies on hospital falls have been limited in several ways, including variations in study design, setting, patient population, and definitions of risk factors. Some studies have continued to focus solely on the elderly or relied only on data included in hospital incident reports or chart review. Furthermore, environmental and care-related factors, including patient-to-nurse ratio, are often overlooked as potential risk factors for falling in these studies. Because fall prevention programs should be linked to the etiologic factors of fa...

"Patterns and predictors of inpatient falls and fall-related injuries in a large academic hospital." Infection

"Circumstances of patient falls and injuries in 9 hospitals in a midwestern healthcare system." Infection

Objective.To evaluate an intervention to prevent falls at a hospital.Design.A quasi-experimental intervention with historical and contemporaneous control groups.Setting and Participants.Nursing staff and patients in the medicine service (comprising 2 intervention floors and 2 control floors) at an academic hospital.Intervention.Nursing staff were educated regarding fall prevention during the period from April through December 2005. Data on implemented prevention strategies were collected on control and intervention floors. Mean monthly fall rates were compared over time and between intervention and control floors, using repeated-measures analysis of variance.Results.Postintervention fall knowledge test scores for the nursing staff were greater than preintervention test scores (mean postintervention test score, 91%; mean preintervention test score, 72%;P< .001). Use of prevention strategies was greater on intervention floors than it was on control floors, including patient education via pamphlets (46% vs 15%;P< .001), use of toileting schedules (36% vs 25%;P= .016), and discussion of high-risk medications (51% vs 30%;P< .001). The mean fall rate for the first 5 months of the intervention was 43% less than that for the 9-month preintervention period for intervention floors (3.81 falls per 1,000 patient-days vs 6.64 falls per 1,000 patient-days;P= .043). Comparisons of mean rates for the overall 9-month intervention period versus the 9-month preintervention period showed a 23% difference in the fall rate for intervention floors, but this did not reach statistical significance (5.09 falls per 1,000 patient-days vs 6.64 falls per 1,000 patient-days;P= .182).Conclusion.The nursing staffs knowledge and use of prevention strategies increased. Fall rates decreased for 5 months after the educational intervention, but the reduction was not sustained.