OBJECTIVES. Fear of falling has been recognized as a potentially debilitating consequence of falling in elderly persons. However, the prevalence and the correlates of this fear are unknown. METHODS. Prevalence of fear of falling was calculated from the 1-year follow-up of an age- and gender-stratified random sample of community-dwelling elderly persons. Cross-sectional associations of fear of falling with quality of life, frailty, and falling were assessed. RESULTS. The prevalence of fear increased with age and was greater in women. After adjustment for age and gender, being moderately fearful of falling was associated with decreased satisfaction with life, increased frailty and depressed mood, and recent experience with falls. Being very fearful of falling was associated with all of the above plus decreased mobility and social activities. CONCLUSIONS. Fear of falling is common in elderly persons and is associated with decreased quality of life, increased frailty, and recent experience with falls.

OBJECTIVE:To describe the epidemiology of hospital inpatient falls, including characteristics of patients who fall, circumstances of falls, and fall-related injuries. DESIGN:Prospective descriptive study of inpatient falls. Data on patient characteristics, fall circumstances, and injury were collected through interviews with patients and/or nurses and review of adverse event reports and medical records. Fall rates and nurse staffing levels were compared by service. SETTING:A 1,300-bed urban academic hospital over 13 weeks. PATIENTS:All inpatient falls reported for medicine, cardiology, neurology, orthopedics, surgery, oncology, and women and infants services during the study period were included. Falls in the psychiatry service and falls during physical therapy sessions were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:A total of 183 patients fell during the study period. The average age of patients who fell was 63.4 years (range 17 to 96). Many falls were unassisted (79%) and occurred in the patient's room (85%), during the evening/overnight (59%), and during ambulation (19%). Half of the falls (50%) were elimination related, which was more common in patients over 65 years old (83% vs 48%; P < .001). Elimination-related falls increased the risk of fall-related injury (adjusted odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.3). The medicine and neurology services had the highest fall rates (both were 6.12 falls per 1,000 patient-days), and the highest patient to nurse ratios (6.5 and 5.3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Falls in the hospital affect young as well as older patients, are often unassisted, and involve eliminationrelated activities. Further studies are necessary to prevent hospital falls and reduce fall injury rates.

No abstract

Weight-bearing exercise led to significant increases above baseline in bone mineral content which were maintained with continued training in older, postmenopausal women. With reduced weight-bearing exercise, bone mass reverted to baseline levels. Further studies are needed to determine the threshold exercise prescription that will produce significant increases in bone mass.

A simple, completely objective scoring system for a clock completion test has been developed which involves only the number of digits placed in the fourth quadrant of a pre-drawn circle. This readily administered test is as effective in screening for dementia as the longer six-item SBT.

This study compared the effects of two exercise training programs, 11 months in duration, on bone mineral density (BMD) in older, sedentary women. Thirty-nine women, aged 60 -74 years, were assigned to the following groups: (a) a group that performed exercises that introduced stress to the skeleton through ground-reaction forces (GRF) (i.e., walking, jogging, stairs); (b) a group that performed exercises that introduced stress to the skeleton through joint-reaction forces (JRF) (i.e., weight lifting, rowing); or (c) a no-exercise control group. BMD of the whole body, lumbar spine, proximal femur, and distal forearm was assessed five times at ϳ ϳ3-month intervals. The GRF and JRF exercise programs resulted in significant and similar increases in BMD of the whole body (2.0 ؎ 0.8% and 1.6 ؎ 0.4%, respectively), lumbar spine (1.8 ؎ 0.7% and 1.5 ؎ 0.5%, respectively), and Ward's triangle region of the proximal femur (6.1 ؎ 1.5% and 5.1 ؎ 2.1%, respectively). There was a significant increase in BMD of the femoral neck only in response to the GRF exercise program (GRF, 3.5 ؎ 0.8%; JRF, ؊0.2 ؎ 0.7%). There were no significant changes in BMD in control subjects. Among all exercisers, there was a significant inverse (r ‫؍‬ ؊0.52, p < 0.01) relationship between increases in whole body BMD and reductions in fat mass, suggesting a dose response effect of exercise on bone mass. Although femoral neck BMD was responsive only to the GRF exercise program, some adaptations (i.e., increase in lean body mass and strength) that were specific to the JRF exercise program may be important in preventing osteoporotic fractures by reducing the risk for falls. It remains to be determined whether all of these benefits can be gained through a training program that combines the different types of exercises employed in this

OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively analyze potential risk factors for falling in the hospital and describe the circumstances surrounding falls.DESIGN: Case-control study. Data on potential risk factors and circumstances of the falls were collected via interviews with patients and/ or nurses and review of adverse event reports, medical records, and nurse staffing records.SETTING: Large urban academic hospital.PATIENTS: Ninety-eight inpatients who fell and 318 controls matched on approximate length of stay until the index fall. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:In a multivariate model of patient-related, medication, and care-related variables, factors that were significantly associated with an increased risk of falling included: gait/balance deficit or lower extremity problem (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 9.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 41.0), confusion (aOR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.6 to 8.4), use of sedatives/hypnotics (aOR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.6 to 11.5), use of diabetes medications (aOR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.3 to 7.9), increasing patient-to-nurse ratio (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.0), and activity level of ''up with assistance'' compared with ''bathroom privileges'' (aOR, 8.7; 95% CI, 2.3 to 32.7). Urinary or stool frequency or incontinence was of borderline significance (aOR, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.99 to 5.6). Having one or more side rails raised was associated with a decreased risk of falling (aOR, 0.006; 95% CI, 0.001 to 0.024).CONCLUSIONS: Patient health status, especially abnormal gait or lower extremity problems, medications, as well as care-related factors, increase the risk of falling. Fall prevention programs should target patients with these risk factors and consider using frequently scheduled mobilization and toileting, and minimizing use of medications related to falling. Due to the risk of significant injury and the increased cost, reduction of falls in hospitals is a major priority for hospital quality and patient safety. While falls have been relatively well studied in community and nursing home settings, less is known about the prevention of hospital falls. Previous research has identified risk factors for falling in the hospital, including impaired balance or gait, history of falling, increasing age, impaired cognition, depression, dizziness or vertigo, orthostatic hypotension, visual impairment, urinary frequency, nocturia, incontinence, specific diagnoses, and use of certain medications, such as benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, and sedatives. 10,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Yet comparative studies on hospital falls have been limited in several ways, including variations in study design, setting, patient population, and definitions of risk factors. Some studies have continued to focus solely on the elderly or relied only on data included in hospital incident reports or chart review. Furthermore, environmental and care-related factors, including patient-to-nurse ratio, are often overlooked as potential risk factors for falling in these studies. Because fall prevention programs should be linked to the etiologic factors of fa...

"Patterns and predictors of inpatient falls and fall-related injuries in a large academic hospital." Infection