Historically, most SEM operators used accelerating voltages that were fairly high, quite often in the range of 15–20 kV. Now progress in electron optics has made low-voltage observations a routine mode of SEM operation. The greatly improved range of utilized accelerating voltages provides the SEM operator with additional flexibility and with additional responsibilities for choosing the right SEM settings for image acquisition.
In development of photopolymerized expanding monomers with epoxy resin systems, there is a need for reactive expanding monomers that exert a good biocompatibility profile. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro toxicology of new spiroorthocarbonates designed to be expanding monomers. The expanding monomers investigated were: trans/trans-2,3,8,9-di(tetramethylene)-1,5,7,11-tetraoxaspiro[5,5] undecane (DTM-TOSU), 5,5-diethyl-19-oxadispiro-[1,3-dioxane-2,2'-1,3-dioxane-5',4'-bicy clo[4.1.0]heptane] (DECHE-TOSU); 3,9-diethyl-3,9-dipropionyloxy methyl-1,5,7,11-tetraoxaspiro[5.5]undecane (DEDPM-TOSU); and 3,9-diethyl-3,9-diacetoxy methyl-1,5,7,11-tetraoxaspiro[5.5]undecane (DAMDE-TOSU). The in vitro toxicology of these monomers measured their cytotoxicity and mutagenicity potential. Succinic dehydrogenase (SDH) activity in the MTT assay was used to assess the toxic dose that kills 50% of cells (TC50) for all the monomers. Their mutagenic potential was measured in the Ames Salmonella assay with and without metabolic activation. Two solvents, DMSO and acetone, were used to validate effects. Appropriate controls included the solvents alone. All the expanding monomers in this study were less cytotoxic than BISGMA (p < 0.01), a commercial component of dental restoratives. The relative cytotoxicity of the expanding monomers in DMSO was defined in the following order: DTM-TOSU (more toxic) > DECHE-TOSU > DEDPM-TOSU > DAMDE-TOSU. Each was significantly different from the other (p < 0.05). Overall, the TC50 values of all expanding monomers were significantly greater in DMSO than in acetone (p < 0.05). However, for BISGMA this trend was opposite. For mutagenicity results, the expanding monomers were non-mutagenic and there was no solvent effect on this outcome. The non-mutagenicity and low cytotoxicity profile of these expanding monomers suggests their potential for development of biocompatible non-shrinking composites.
Extended abstract of a paper presented at Microscopy and Microanalysis 2008 in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, August 3 – August 7, 2008
The first demonstration of an SEM to students is a rewarding experience. Whether it is the beginning of a course in instrumentation or just an illustration of the abilities of an SEM for "prospective users", whether students have engineering or biological backgrounds, both graduate and undergraduate students are thrilled to see a "real electron microscope". We thus have an easy task of only having to choose the right specimens to fulfill their anticipation and to present the right amount of information that will be easily absorbed and remembered for a long time.Insects are the prima donnas of SEM imaging. We usually start our demonstrations with insects ( Fig.1). Their multifaceted eyes, terrifying (at proper magnifications) mouths, exoskeletons, jointed limbs, and segmented bodies look so astonishingly alien under the microscope, so remarkably different from their familiar (to the naked eye) appearance, that insects unfailingly get the students thrilled and prepare them to absorb information. Most insects do not require any special preparation. A sun-dried insect collected on a deck or a driveway in dry weather makes a nice specimen.While observing insects at various magnifications, we print an image on a video printer attached to the microscope and bring the students' attention to the fact that now we can see two similar images: one on an SEM monitor, which shows magnification, for example 1000x, and one on a small print, where the magnification is 373x. Surprisingly, most students are puzzled by the difference in magnifications, even though many of them have already used some type of microscope. Somehow the wrong idea that magnification is some instrumental constant gets imprinted i n s t u d e n t s' minds. Therefore, we have to explain the interrelation between the size of the field of view on the specimen surface and the size of the final picture, and that by increasing the size of the picture we are increasing the magnification proportionally. We stress that as a result practically all shown magnifications for pictures in publications are wrong, and the courteous author will present pictures with a micron bar.If our first specimens require some special specimen collection (usually outside a microscopy lab), our second set of specimens is available in any lab: it is two pieces of paper, writing paper and filter paper. We are now shifting the students' attention from creatures that are part of nature to man-made seemingly dull objects: plain, white, and featureless. After all the excitement with insects, students have pretty low expectations when we are switching to paper specimens and they are consequently surprised to see the complicated microstructure of paper. A tangle of pulp fibers looks pretty good on a micrograph of filter paper (Fig.2), and its morphology looks very different from the morphology of writing paper (Fig. 3 a). Switching accelerating voltage from 2 kV (see Fig. 3a) to 15 kV (Fig. 3b) transforms the image dramatically. With this example we can explain the importance of choosing the rig...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.