With the ever-increasing development in science and technology, as well as social awareness, more requirements are imposed on the production and property of all materials, especially polymeric foams. In particular, rubber foams, compared to thermoplastic foams in general, have higher flexibility, resistance to abrasion, energy absorption capabilities, strength-to-weight ratio and tensile strength leading to their widespread use in several applications such as thermal insulation, energy absorption, pressure sensors, absorbents, etc. To control the rubber foams microstructure leading to excellent physical and mechanical properties, two types of parameters play important roles. The first category is related to formulation including the rubber (type and grade), as well as the type and content of accelerators, fillers, and foaming agents. The second category is associated to processing parameters such as the processing method (injection, extrusion, compression, etc.), as well as different conditions related to foaming (temperature, pressure and number of stage) and curing (temperature, time and precuring time). This review presents the different parameters involved and discusses their effect on the morphological, physical, and mechanical properties of rubber foams. Although several studies have been published on rubber foams, very few papers reviewed the subject and compared the results available. In this review, the most recent works on rubber foams have been collected to provide a general overview on different types of rubber foams from their preparation to their final application. Detailed information on formulation, curing and foaming chemistry, production methods, morphology, properties, and applications is presented and discussed.

No abstract

In this work, uniform and graded polyolefin elastomer (POE) foams were prepared using a single-step technology based on a fixed chemical blowing agent (azodicarbonamide) concentration of 4 phr (parts per hundred rubber). The effect of molding temperature, including the average temperature (Tavg) and temperature difference (ΔT), on the foams’ morphology, mechanical properties (tension, compression and hardness) and thermal conductivity was investigated. Two series of samples were produced by fixing Tavg with different ΔT or setting different ΔT, leading to different Tavg. The morphological analyses showed that two or three regions inside the foams were produced depending on the molding conditions, each region having different cellular structure in terms of cell size, cell density and cell geometry. The results obtained for the conditions tested showed a range of density (0.55–0.72 g/cm3), tensile modulus (0.44–0.70 MPa) and compression elastic modulus (0.35–0.71 MPa), with a thermal conductivity between 0.125 and 0.180 W/m.K. Based on the information provided, it can be concluded that the foam’s properties can be easily controlled by the cellular structure and that graded samples are more interesting than uniform ones, especially for thermal insulation applications, such as packaging, construction, transportation, automotive and aerospace industries.

In this study, polyolefin elastomer (POE) foams were prepared without any curing agent using a single-step foaming technique. The effect of azodicarbonamide (ADC) content as a chemical foaming agent on the foams’ morphology and mechanical properties was studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), mechanical properties (tension and compression) and hardness. The results showed that increasing the ADC content from 2 to 3, 4 and 5 phr (parts per hundred rubber) decreased the foam density from 0.75 to 0.71, 0.65 and 0.61 g/cm3, respectively. The morphological analysis revealed that increasing the ADC content from 2 to 4 phr produced smaller cell sizes from 153 to 109 µm (29% lower), but a higher cell density from 103 to 591 cells/mm3 (470% higher). However, using 5 phr of ADC led to a larger cell size (148 µm) and lower cell density (483 cells/mm3) due to cell coalescence. The tensile modulus, strength at break, elongation and hardness properties continuously decreased by 28%, 21%, 16% and 14%, respectively, with increasing ADC content (2 to 5 phr). On the other hand, the compressive properties, including elastic modulus and compressive strength, increased by 20% and 64%, respectively, with increasing ADC content (2 to 5 phr). The tensile and compression tests revealed that the former is more dependent on foam density (foaming ratio), while the latter is mainly controlled by the cellular structure (cell size, cell density and internal gas pressure). In addition, 2D SEM images were used to simulate the foams’ real 3D structure, which was used in finite element methods (FEM) to simulate the stress–strain behavior of the samples at two levels: micro-scale and macro-scale. Finally, the FEM results were compared to the experimental data. Based on the information obtained, a good agreement between the macro-scale stress–strain behavior generated by the FEM simulations and experimental data was obtained. While the FEM results showed that the sample with 3 phr of ADC had the lowest micro-scale stress, the sample with 5 phr had the highest micro-scale stress due to smaller and larger cell sizes, respectively.

During recent decades, rubber foams have found their way into several areas of the modern world because these materials have interesting properties such as high flexibility, elasticity, deformability (especially at low temperature), resistance to abrasion and energy absorption (damping properties). Therefore, they are widely used in automobiles, aeronautics, packaging, medicine, construction, etc. In general, the mechanical, physical and thermal properties are related to the foam’s structural features, including porosity, cell size, cell shape and cell density. To control these morphological properties, several parameters related to the formulation and processing conditions are important, including foaming agents, matrix, nanofillers, temperature and pressure. In this review, the morphological, physical and mechanical properties of rubber foams are discussed and compared based on recent studies to present a basic overview of these materials depending on their final application. Openings for future developments are also presented.

Sustainable natural rubber foams were prepared by replacing petroleum‐based carbon black (CB) with recycled silica (SiO2) nanoparticles. The total nanofiller concentration was fixed at 40 phr, while the CB/silica ratio was changed from 40/0 to 0/40. The results showed that increasing the silica content increased the curing characteristics, such as delta torque (ΔM) by 54%, scorch time (ts) by 50% and optimum curing time (t90) by 65%. But foams based on a hybrid system (20/20) produced a more homogeneous structure improving the cell nucleation step and leading to the smallest cell size (18 μm) and highest cell density (8.8 × 103 cells mm−3) due to reduced filler−filler interactions and better particle dispersion. This improved cellular morphology generated superior mechanical and thermal insulation performance, including the highest compression modulus (2.7 MPa), compressive strength (1.9 MPa) and recoverability (96.6%) combined with the lowest thermal conductivity (0.114 W m−1 K−1) at a density of 0.652 g cm−3. Nevertheless, the foam with 40 phr silica showed higher compressive modulus (26%) and compression strength (15%) compared to the reference sample having 40 phr CB, mainly due to its higher crosslink density. As a final comparison, the recycled silica, being a suitable and sustainable alternative to petroleum‐based CB, showed superior mechanical and thermal insulation properties compared to a commercial grade of silica for natural rubber foams. © 2023 The Authors. Polymer International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Industrial Chemistry.