Breast cancer (one of the most common malignancy in Western societies), as well as esophagus, stomach, lung, bladder, and prostate cancer, depend on environmental factors and diet for growth and evolution. Dietary micronutriments have been proposed as effective inhibitory agents for cancer initiation, progression, and incidence. Among them, polyphenols, present in different foods and beverages, have retained attention in recent years. Red wine is a rich source of polyphenols, and their antioxidant and tumor arresting effects have been demonstrated in different in vitro and in vivo systems. In the present study, we have measured the antiproliferative effect of red wine concentrate, its total polyphenolic pool, and purified catechin, epicatechin, quercetin, and resveratrol, which account for more than 70% of the total polyphenols in red wine, on the proliferation of hormone sensitive (MCF7, T47D) and resistant (MDA-MB-231) breast cancer cell lines. Our results indicate that polyphenols, at the picomolar or the nanomolar range, decrease cell proliferation in a dose- and a time-dependant manner. In hormone sensitive cell lines, a specific interaction of each polyphenol with steroid receptors was observed, with IC(50)s lower than previously described. Interaction of polyphenols with steroid receptors cannot fully explain their inhibitory effect on cell proliferation. In addition, discrete antioxidant action on each cell line was detected under the same concentrations, both by modifying the toxic effect of H(2)O(2), and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), after phorbol ester stimulation. Our results suggest that low concentrations of polyphenols, and consecutively, consumption of wine, or other polyphenol-rich foods and beverages, could have a beneficial antiproliferative effect on breast cancer cell growth.

The effect of different wine antioxidant polyphenols (catechin, epicatechin, quercetin, and resveratrol) on the growth of three prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP, PC3, and DU145) was investigated. A dose- and time-dependent inhibition of cell growth by polyphenols was found at nanomolar concentrations. The proliferation of LNCaP and PC3 cells was preferentially inhibited by flavonoids (catechin, epicatechin, and quercetin), whereas resveratrol was the most potent inhibitor of DU145 cell growth. Possible mechanisms of action were investigated: 1) The competition of polyphenols for androgen binding in LNCaP cells revealed significant interaction only in the case of high concentrations of quercetin, at least at five orders of magnitude higher than the concentrations needed for cell growth inhibition. All other phenols showed low interactions. 2) Oxygen species production after mitogen stimulation and H2O2 sensitivity of these cell lines did not correlate with the observed antiproliferative effects, ruling out such a mode of action. 3) NO production revealed two different patterns: LNCaP and DU145 cells produced high concentrations of NO, whereas PC3 cells produced low concentrations. Phorbol ester stimulation of cells did not reveal any additional effect in LNCaP and DU145 cells, whereas it enhanced the secretion of NO in PC3 cells. Polyphenols decreased NO secretion. This effect correlates with their antiproliferative action and the inhibition of inducible NO synthase. It is therefore proposed that the antiproliferative effect of polyphenols is mediated through the modulation of NO production. In conclusion, our data show a direct inhibitory effect of low concentrations of antioxidant wine phenols on the proliferation of human prostate cancer cell lines mediated by the production of NO, further suggesting potential beneficial effects of wine and other phenol-containing foods or drinks for the control of prostate cancer cell growth.

The oncoptrotective properties of exogenous antioxidants have been documented in a number of epidemiological, intervention and in vitro studies (for a recent review see [1]). However, the mechanisms implicated are far from being clarified. Antioxidant effects, steroid receptor binding, direct interaction with intracellular elements and signaling systems and, recently, aryl hydrocarbon receptor AhR = aryl hydrocarbon receptor; ARNT = aryl hydrocarbon nuclear translocator protein; BSA = bovine serum albumin; DMEM = Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; eNOS = endothelial nitric oxide synthase; EROD = ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase; FBS = fetal bovine serum; IC 50 = inhibitory concentration 50%; iNOS = inducible nitric oxide synthase; MTT = 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide; NF = nuclear factor; NO = nitric oxide; NOS = nitric oxide synthase; PAA = 3,4-dihydroxy-phenylacetic acid; PBS = phosphate-buffered saline; PCR = polymerase chain reaction; RT = reverse transcriptase. Kampa et al., licensee BioMed Central Ltd (Print ISSN 1465-5411; Online ISSN 1465-542X). This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. AbstractIntroduction The oncoprotective role of food-derived polyphenol antioxidants has been described but the implicated mechanisms are not yet clear. In addition to polyphenols, phenolic acids, found at high concentrations in a number of plants, possess antioxidant action. The main phenolic acids found in foods are derivatives of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid and 4-hydroxycinnamic acid.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Recently we identified and characterized opioid binding sites in OK (opossum kidney) cells and observed decreased proliferation of these cells in response to opioids. In the present study we investigated the effects of opioids on the actin cytoskeleton and explored whether their antiproliferative action may relate to alterations in the distribution or the dynamics of actin microfilaments. Exposure of OK cells to the opioids alphaS1 casomorphin and ethylketocyclazocine resulted in a rapid and substantial actin microfilament reorganization. This was documented by a significant dose-dependent decrease in the amounts of F-actin, determined by measurements of quantitative fluorescence, by immunoblot analysis and by a concomitant increase of the G/total-actin ratio measured by the DNase I inhibition assay. These changes were verified by confocal laser scanning microscopy, which showed marked redistribution of the microfilamentous structures in the presence of the opioids without affecting the organization of microtubules or vimentin intermediate filaments. The effect of opioids on actin polymerization dynamics occurred within 15 min and persisted for at least 2 h, while their restoration to control levels was accomplished 6 h later, indicating a reversible phenomenon. Northern blot analysis showed that the concentration of the actin transcript was unaffected. The addition of diprenorphine, a general opioid antagonist, prevented the effects of opioids on the actin cytoskeleton. The inhibition of OK cell proliferation, induced by ethylketocyclazocine and alphaS1 casomorphin was partially prevented in the presence of phallacidin, which stabilizes microfilaments. Our findings demonstrate that opioids, acting via kappa 1 binding sites, induce rapidly modifications in the dynamics of actin polymerization, and in the organization of microfilaments in OK cells, which may relate to their antiproliferative effect on these cells.

Opioids decrease cell proliferation in different systems including breast, prostate, lung, kidney, and intestine, through an interaction with opioid as well as other membrane-receptor systems (somatostatin, cholinergic), through an unidentified mechanism. Recently, we have reported an interaction of taxol with opioid membrane sites (BBRC 235, 201-204, 1997), and an involvement of opioids to the modification of actin cytoskeleton in renal OK cells (J Cell Biochem. [19981 70:60-69), indicating a possible action of the opioid effect. In the present work, we have examined the effect of two general opioid agonists (ethylketocyclazocine and etorphine) on the cell cycle, in human breast cancer T47D cells, as well as a possible modification of the cellular cytoskeleton under their action, in order to explain the antiproliferative effect of these agents. These two opioids produce a dose-dependent and reversible decrease of the proliferation of T47D cells, with a maximum attained at 10(-8) M. The addition of 10(-8) M of either opioid produced a significant increase of the number of cells arrested in the G2/M phase. Confocal laser microscopy revealed a modification of the actin and tubulin microfilaments, with a clear redistribution at the periphery of the cell, reversed by the addition of the general opioid antagonist diprenorphine. Furthermore, differences between the two opioids were obvious, attributed to the different receptor affinity of each agent. The observed redistribution of actin and tubulin cytoskeletal elements gives therefore a possible answer of the antiproliferative action of opioids. The modification of the cytoskeleton, directly involved to cell division, might provoke a "mechanical" obstacle, which could be the reason of the antiproliferative effect of these agonists. Furthermore, the observed tubulin-opioid interaction by opioids provides a possible explanation of the arrest at the G2/M phase of T47D cells under opioid treatment. Nevertheless, although the observed interaction of opioids with cytoskeletal elements gives a plausible answer of the antiproliferative effects of the agents, this might not be the only action of these agents in cell proliferation. Other, direct or indirect, genomic actions, which which remains to be elucidated, might be taken into consideration.