ObjectiveTo describe a cohort of patients with acute liver failure and to analyze the demographic and clinical factors associated with mortality.MethodsRetrospective cohort study in which all patients admitted for acute liver failure from July 28, 2012, to August 31, 2017, were included. Clinical and demographic data were collected using the Epimed System. The SAPS 3, SOFA, and MELD scores were measured. The odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Receiver operating characteristics curves were obtained for the prognostic scores, along with the Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the score best predicting mortality.ResultsThe majority of the 40 patients were female (77.5%), and the most frequent etiology was hepatitis B (n = 13). Only 35% of the patients underwent liver transplantation. The in-hospital mortality rate was 57.5% (95%CI: 41.5 - 73.5). Among the scores investigated, only SOFA remained associated with risk of death (OR = 1.37; 95%CI 1.11 - 1.69; p < 0.001). After SOFA stratification into < 12 and ≥ 12 points, survival was higher in patients with SOFA <12 (log-rank p < 0.001).ConclusionSOFA score in the first 24 hours was the best predictor of fatal outcome.

The philosophy of organ allocation is the result of two seemingly irreconcilable principles: utilitarianism and distributive justice. The process of organ donation and transplantation in Brazil reveals large inequalities between regions and units of the Federation, from the harvesting of organs to their implantation. In this context, lung transplantation is performed in only a few centers in the country and is still a treatment with limited long-term results. The allocation of the few organs harvested for the few procedures performed is defined mainly by chronology, a criterion that is not linked to necessity, which is a criterion of distributive justice, and neither to utility, a criterion of utilitarianism. This article reviews the organ allocation philosophy focusing on the case of lung transplantations in Brazil.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the calibration and discrimination of APACHE IV in the postoperative period after kidney transplantation.MethodsThis clinical cohort study included 986 hospitalized adult patients in the immediate postoperative period after kidney transplantation, in a single center in southern Brazil.ResultsKidney transplant patients who died in hospital had significantly higher APACHE IV values and higher predicted mortality. The APACHE IV score showed adequate calibration (H-L 11.24 p = 0.188) and a good discrimination ROC curve of 0.738 (95%CI 0.643 - 0.833, p < 0.001), although SMR overestimated mortality (SMR = 0.73; 95%CI: 0.24 - 1.42, p = 0.664).ConclusionsThe APACHE IV score showed adequate performance for predicting hospital outcomes in the postoperative period for kidney transplant recipients.

No abstract

Resumo: O processo de doação e transplante hepático no Brasil revela grandes desigualdades entre regiões e Unidades da Federação, desde a captação de órgãos até o implante do fígado. Em 2006, o escore MELD (Model for End-stage Liver Disease), inspirado no modelo estadunidense e baseado no princípio da necessidade, foi introduzido no Brasil para a alocação de fígado. Porém, as desigualdades no nosso país têm comprometido, parcialmente, o sucesso dessa iniciativa. Em outros países, já se presencia uma crescente discussão sobre o benefício de modelos que tentam harmonizar utilitarismo e necessidade. O presente artigo revisa a literatura pertinente com um foco especial na realidade brasileira.

No abstract