Sternal wound complications are significant problems in cardiac surgery and cause challenges to surgeons as they are associated with high mortality, morbidity, and a tremendous load on the hospital budget. Risk factors and preventive measures against sternal wound infection need to be in focus. Classification of different types of sternotomy complications post cardiac surgery is important for specific categorization and management. Reviewing the literature, a variety of classifications was introduced to help understand the pathophysiology of these wounds and how best to manage them. Initial classifications were based on the postoperative period of the infectious process and risk factors. Recently, the anatomical description of sternal wound, including the depth and location, was shown to be more practical. There is a lack of evidence-based surgical consensus for the appropriate management strategy, including type of closure, choice of sternal coverage post sternectomy, whether primary, delayed and when to use reconstructive flaps.

Background The swift advances in interventional cardiology combined with the increasing risk of cardiac surgical procedures resulted in diminishing volume of coronary and valvular surgery and affected the future of cardiac surgery service and training. Application to cardiac surgery training programs have steadily declined. This cross‐sectional study aimed at identifying main weakness facing cardiac surgery and advocating some recommendations to improve the status of current and future of cardiac surgery. Methods Cross‐sectional study was authorized by the institutional review board of King Abdulaziz University and performed among cardiac surgeons and cardiologists in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from May to June 2021. Data were collected by sending questionnaires through email to cardiac surgeons and cardiologists in different cardiac centers all over Saudi Arabia. Out of 200 emails sent to our participants only 55 who responded. Results A total of 55 doctors who participated in the study have completed the self‐administered questionnaire by electronic mail. Seventy‐six percent of the respondents are cardiac surgeons and 24% are cardiologists. Most of the respondents (72.7%, 63.6%) think that the volume of coronary and valvular cardiac surgery patients nowadays is less than before compared to invasive cardiology patients. Most of the respondents (91%) think that coronary cardiac surgery is better than invasive cardiology in left main disease and complex lesions but carries higher risk. Sixty‐nine percent of the respondents think that one cardiac center in each city according to the population will provide better cardiac health services compared to small cardiac units. Conclusion In the recommendations to improve the future of cardiac surgery, 83% of the respondents agree that residents training in cardiac surgery should be modified to add at least one extra year of training in the Catheterization Laboratory (Cath lab) procedures including coronary, valvular, aortic and arrhythmia, thus introducing the interventional surgeon.

Background Important differences in the mechanism of respiration between adults and children warrant distinction in the management of diaphragmatic paralysis as a complication of cardiac surgery. We describe the management and outcomes of this complication in both groups. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 16 patients (5 adults and 11 children) with diaphragmatic paralysis after cardiac surgery performed between 2008 and 2018. Clinical examination, chest radiography, and confirmation with fluoroscopy in selected cases were our modalities of diagnosis. All adults were managed conservatively, whereas plication was performed in all children. Results The incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis was 0.98% in pediatric patients and 0.43% in adults. The mean age was 2.33 ± 2.59 years in children and 53.2 ± 17.99 years in adults. All adults were symptomatic. All children showed difficulty in weaning from mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery. The period of mechanical ventilation before plication was 2–6 days (median 4 days). Death occurred as a result of low cardiac output in a 10-year-old boy, and due to respiratory failure in a 30-year-old woman. Children were successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation after diaphragmatic plication. The median time to extubation after plication was 2.5 days (range 1–13 days). The median period of recovery in adults was 52 days (range 32–85 days). All survivors had acceptable outcomes at 6 months to one year. Conclusion Conservative management in adults and early plication in children are viable treatment options for diaphragmatic palsy after cardiac surgery, with acceptable outcomes.

No abstract