We read with great interest the article 1 describing the impact of COVID-19 on medical education in Hong Kong, where a pilot study implemented distant surgical teaching for final year medical students using web-based surgical skills learning (WSSL) via Zoom. As UK based medical students at King's College London, who have recently
Background
Although we do not know how often doctors enquire about their patients’ work, evidence suggests that occupation is often not recorded in clinical notes. There is a lack of research into doctors’ views on the importance of patient occupation or their educational needs in this area.
Aims
To assess doctors’ attitudes to using patient occupation information for care-planning and to determine doctors’ need for specific training in occupational health.
Methods
We undertook a cross-sectional survey of doctors in cardiology, obstetrics and gynaecology, oncology and orthopaedics. Our questionnaire explored attitudes of the doctors to asking patients about their occupational status, their training and competency to do so, and their training needs in occupational health.
Results
The response rate was 42/46 (91%). Obstetrics and gynaecology 6/9 (67%) and oncology doctors 3/6 (50%) reported enquiring about the nature of patients’ occupations’ ‘most of the time’/‘always’ and that it rarely influenced clinical decisions. This contrasted with orthopaedic doctors 12/12 (100%) and cardiology doctors 14/15 (93%). Although 19/42 (45%) participants felt it was important to ask patients their occupation, only 10/42 (24%) ‘always’ asked patients about their work. The majority of participants 29/41 (71%) reported receiving no training in occupational health, but 37/42 (88%) considered that some training would be useful.
Conclusions
Training on the importance of occupation and its’ role as a clinical outcome in care-planning, might help doctors feel more competent in discussing the impact of health on work with patients.
Aim
NICE Clinical Guidelines (CG138) specify the importance of involvement of family members and carers at key patient care junctures. Furthermore, published literature and our own experience reaffirm that ‘low-quality communication causes profound distress to families that can affect the quality of dying and bereavement'. There is little evidence on NOK’s experience for surgical patients, so we sought to assess whether NOK details were available and whether they had been contacted peri-operatively for patients receiving laparotomies.
Method
We performed a closed loop audit using NELA database to identify patients admitted for laparotomies between February 1st to July 31st, 2021. The initial data was collated, analysed, and presented during educational meetings with informal reminders for a week to implement changes. Thereafter, data was collected to complete the audit cycle on communication with NOK.
Results
A total of 70 patients were included. Prior to the implementation, 86% of patients undergoing laparotomies had NOK information documented in clinical records, with only 75% of telephone numbers reachable and 33% had documented evidence of contact within 48 hours post-operation. Post-implementation, 97% of patients had their NOK information in their clinical records, with 97% telephone numbers reachable and 41% had documented evidence of contact with 48hours.
Conclusions
The importance of clerical staff and clerking doctors establishing NOK’s details, documenting these within iCare/notes and establishing whether patient are happy with NOK being contacted for updates on patient management, could reduce distress and potentially improve the experiences of hospital admission, recovery and in some cases, bereavement.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.