2020
DOI: 10.1111/1744-1633.12466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Letter to the Editor: Distant surgical teaching during COVID‐19 ‐ A pilot study on final year medical students

Abstract: We read with great interest the article 1 describing the impact of COVID-19 on medical education in Hong Kong, where a pilot study implemented distant surgical teaching for final year medical students using web-based surgical skills learning (WSSL) via Zoom. As UK based medical students at King's College London, who have recently

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 16 papers used a variety of methodologies, including one cross-sectional study, two quantitative descriptive studies, two quasi-experimental studies, one prospective cohort study and the rest of the ten mixed-method studies. The publications were devoted to exploring the different modalities of digital education, including virtual reality-based simulation training (3 studies) ( De Ponti et al, 2020 ; Kang et al, 2020 ; Weston and Zauche, 2020 ), teleconsultation and virtual rounds (3 studies) ( Bala et al, 2021 ; Sukumar et al, 2021 ; Weber et al, 2021 ), web-based specialized skills learning (2 studies) ( Alpert et al, 2020 ; Shahrjerdi et al, 2020 ), and multimodal online curriculums (8 studies) ( Coffey et al, 2020 ; He et al, 2021 ; Kaliyadan et al, 2020 ; Kasai et al, 2021 ; Michener et al, 2020 ; Samueli et al, 2020 ; Williams et al, 2021 ; Zhou et al, 2020 ). Study outcomes were measured utilizing a series of homemade tools.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The 16 papers used a variety of methodologies, including one cross-sectional study, two quantitative descriptive studies, two quasi-experimental studies, one prospective cohort study and the rest of the ten mixed-method studies. The publications were devoted to exploring the different modalities of digital education, including virtual reality-based simulation training (3 studies) ( De Ponti et al, 2020 ; Kang et al, 2020 ; Weston and Zauche, 2020 ), teleconsultation and virtual rounds (3 studies) ( Bala et al, 2021 ; Sukumar et al, 2021 ; Weber et al, 2021 ), web-based specialized skills learning (2 studies) ( Alpert et al, 2020 ; Shahrjerdi et al, 2020 ), and multimodal online curriculums (8 studies) ( Coffey et al, 2020 ; He et al, 2021 ; Kaliyadan et al, 2020 ; Kasai et al, 2021 ; Michener et al, 2020 ; Samueli et al, 2020 ; Williams et al, 2021 ; Zhou et al, 2020 ). Study outcomes were measured utilizing a series of homemade tools.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodological quality, as appraised by the MMAT exercise for the included 16 articles, ranged from 25% to 100%, with one study rated at 100% ( Kang et al, 2020 ); two studies rated at 75% ( Alpert et al, 2020 ; Weston and Zauche, 2020 ); five studied rated at 50% ( Coffey et al, 2020 ; He et al, 2021 ; Kasai et al, 2021 ; Shahrjerdi et al, 2020 ; Zhou et al, 2020 ), and the remaining eight studies rated at 25% ( Bala et al, 2021 ; De Ponti et al, 2020 ; Kaliyadan et al, 2020 ; Michener et al, 2020 ; Samueli et al, 2020 ; Sukumar et al, 2021 ; Weber et al, 2021 ; Williams et al, 2021 ) ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations