No abstract

A corrosion cup test was undertaken using BaAl 2 Si 2 O 8 and Al4.1Zn3.2Mg alloy, heated in air for 150 h at 850°C. Electron probe microanalysis, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive spectroscopy were used to identify the mineralogical and microstructural changes at the interfaces. The microstructural results revealed three microstructural areas: (1) Spinel layer with large numbers of Al alloy channels; (2) interfacial area with mainly alumina, spinel, and BaAl 2 Si 2 O 8 ; and (3) interdiffusion zone chemically close to barium hexaaluminate. The principal observations are:1. BaAl 2 Si 2 O 8 was highly resistant to molten Al alloy corrosion owing to sluggish kinetics, as evidenced by the observation of unreacted BaAl 2 Si 2 O 8 grains in the interfacial area. 2. The nature of the microstructure, particularly an interdiffusion zone instead of a continuous layer of precipitated alumina at the interface between the Al alloy channels and the unreacted BaAl 2 Si 2 O 8 supports the conclusion that the corrosion mechanism is governed by interdiffusion (Si/Ba and Al/Mg) and substitution. 3. The formation and limited retention of an MgO layer at the metal-ceramic interface played a critical role in alloy oxidation and the consequent interfacial phenomena.

No abstract

The present work reports an investigation of the interactions of Al 7075 alloy and anorthite at 850°C (150 h) and 1150°C (24 h). Transmission electron microscopy, electron probe microanalysis, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive spectroscopy were used to identify the mineralogical and microstructural changes at the metalceramic interface. At 850°C, the phase formation mechanisms were (

Al‐Si3N4 couples were heat‐treated at 850‐1150°C for 250 hours. The thickness of the interacted area was measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and scanning/transmission electron microscopy (TEM/STEM). The interaction rate increases exponentially with inverse temperature, with an activation energy of 194.23 kJ/mol and diffusion pre‐coefficient of 5 × 10−9 m2/s, indicating that the interaction is diffusion‐dependent. As the results showed, the interfacial area is comprised of Al alloy channels, Si precipitates, and AlN grains. Al‐Si transfer through the solid solution (Si3‐xAlxN4‐y) at the interface of Al alloy and β‐Si3N4 grains controls the kinetic of the interaction. When concentration of Al in solid solution exceeds a certain amount, it undergoes a topotactic phase transformation to form Al1‐xSixN1+y (viz., AlN). Next, the Al1‐xSixN1+y grains detach from the β‐Si3N4 grains and subsequently new Al‐Si3N4 interfaces are established. These interfaces repeat the interaction process, continuing until all the reactant is depleted. Thus, the interaction kinetics consist of a sequence of associated parabolic stages, precluding the observation of parabolic kinetics.

No abstract

No abstract

Here, we present a comprehensive study on atomic-scale in-situ biasing/heating scanning transmission electron microscopy ((S)TEM) of Al-amorphous SiO2–SiC interface. The investigation includes electrical, chemical, and structural analysis of the interface at different temperatures (25–600 °C). The results show that at ~ 500 °C the electrical (three-orders of magnitude resistivity drop), chemical (dissolution of SiO2 amorphous layer), and microstructural features (e.g. formation of Al2O3, Si and Al4C3) of the interface start to change. According to the results, amorphous SiO2 dissolves in Al, leading to formation of α-Al2O3 and Si within the Al. In contrast, elemental interdiffusion (Al3+ ⇄ Si4+) between Al and SiC occurs resulting in formation of Al4C3. From the results, we can infer that reaction mechanism between Al and crystalline SiC is different with that between Al and SiO2 amorphous phase. It is believed that structural similarities between SiC and Al4C3 play an important role in paving the way for elemental interdiffusion.