Heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) is a syndrome associated with thrombocytopenia, intravascular thrombosis, and arterial emboli. We have evaluated 16 patients for presumed HIPA because of the occurrence of thrombocytopenia or a new thrombotic complication during heparin therapy. In this group, 16 thrombotic events occurred in 10 patients with a mortality rate of 18.8%. Diagnosis was confirmed in vitro by the demonstration of at least 20% platelet aggregation and/or 6% 14C-serotonin release after heparin (0.1 to 3 U/ml) was added to a mixture of patient platelet-poor plasma (PPP, two parts) and aspirin-free donor platelet-rich plasma (PRP, three parts). After heparin was discontinued, seven patients continued to have HIPA in their own PRP although it could no longer be observed in donor PRP. Iloprost, a potent prostacyclin analog that reversibly inhibits platelet activation, completely prevented HIPA and release in all of nine patients. Aspirin, an irreversible cyclooxygenase inhibitor, failed to prevent HIPA in four of these nine patients. In conclusion, HIPA is associated with an extremely high morbidity and mortality rate. Evaluation of the patients' PRP in response to heparin may improve the diagnostic sensitivity of this assay. Aspirin does not reliably prevent HIPA, which suggests participation of thromboxane-independent pathways. Thus, if further exposure to heparin is unavoidable, a more effective platelet inhibitor such as iloprost is required to reliably prevent in vivo HIPA.
Patients with heparin-induced platelet activation who are reexposed to heparin may have recurrent thrombocytopenia, intravascular thrombosis, arterial emboli, or sudden death. To permit carotid endarterectomy in two patients with confirmed heparin-induced platelet activation, we compared the efficacies of aspirin and iloprost, a stable analogue of prostacyclin, in preventing heparin-induced platelet activation. In the first patient, although aspirin prevented both in vitro heparin-induced platelet aggregation (70% without and 7.5% with aspirin) and 14C serotonin release (48% without and 0% with aspirin), intraoperative administration of heparin resulted in an increase in plasma levels of platelet factor 4 from 8 to 260 ng/ml and beta-thromboglobulin levels from 29 to 39 ng/ml. In addition, the circulating platelet count decreased from 221,000 to 174,000 microliters, and 15% spontaneous platelet aggregation was observed. Fortunately, fibrinopeptide A levels remained less than 10 ng/ml intraoperatively, and no thrombotic complications occurred. In the second patient, aspirin did not prevent heparin-induced platelet aggregation in vitro (65% without and 41% with aspirin); however, iloprost (0.01 mumol/L) prevented both in vitro heparin-induced platelet aggregation (59.5% without and 0.0% with iloprost) and 14C serotonin release (56.7% without and 0.0% with iloprost). Therefore, a continuous infusion of iloprost was begun before administration of heparin and was continued until 20 minutes after reversal of heparin with protamine. After intraoperative administration of heparin, plasma levels of platelet factor 4 increased from 19 to 200 ng/ml, and beta-thromboglobulin levels increased from 56 to 76 ng/ml.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) is a syndrome associated with thrombocympenia, intravascular thrombosis, and arterial emboli. We have evaluated 16 patients for presumed HIPA because of the occurrence of thrombocytopenia or a new thrombotic complication during heparin therapy. In this group, 16 thrombotic events occurred ha 10 patients with a mortality rate of 18.8%. Diagnosis was confirmed in vitro by the demonstration of at least 20% platelet aggregation and/or 6% ~4C-serotonin release after heparin (0.1 m 3 U/ml) was added to a mixture of patient platelet-poor plasma (PPP, two parts) and aspirin-free donor platelet-rieh plasma (PRP, three parts). After heparin was discontinued, seven patients continued to have HIPA in their own PRP although it could no longer be observed in donor PRP. Iloprost, a potent prostacyclin analog that reversibly inhibits platelet activation, completely prevented HIPA and release in all of nine patients. Aspirin, an irreversible cyclooxygenase inhibitor, failed to prevent HIPA in four of these nine patients. In conclusion, HIPA is associated with an extremely high morbidity and mortality rate. Evaluation of the patients' PRP in response to heparin may improve the diagnostic sensitivity of this assay. Aspirin does not reliably prevent HIPA, which suggests participation of thromboxane-independent pathways. Thus, if further exposure to heparin is unavoidable, a more effective platelet inhibitor such as iloprost is required to reliably prevent in vivo HIPA.
Atherosclerosis is the paramount cause of late vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass grafting. Lipid peroxidation, which may play a significant role in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis, was examined in segments of vein grafts (n = 6) harvested at reoperation for coronary disease. These were analyzed for cholesterol, phospholipid, triglyceride, and lipid peroxides. Nonatherosclerotic vascular tissues, including coronary arteries (n = 6), saphenous veins (n = 9), and donor aortic specimens (n = 11) were analyzed for comparison. Risk factors for atherosclerosis including elevated serum cholesterol and triglycerides, smoking, and hypertension were more frequent in patients with coronary artery disease compared to organ donors. Lipid peroxides were elevated in explanted vein grafts when compared to either saphenous vein, coronary artery or donor aorta. Lipid peroxides were not significantly different in saphenous vein when compared to coronary artery, but levels in both of these tissues were greater than in donor aorta. Although increased levels of lipid peroxides in explanted veins may simply reflect morphologic changes in these grafts, the known effects of lipid peroxides on a number of biochemical events suggest that they may contribute directly to graft failure after coronary artery bypass grafting.
Patients with heparin-induced platelet activation who are reexposed to heparin may have recurrent thrombocytopenia, intravascular thrombosis, arterial emboli, or sudden death. To permit carotid endarterectomy in two patients with confirmed heparin-induced platelet activation, we compared the efficacies of aspirin and iloprost, a stable analogue of prostacyclin, in preventing heparin-induced platelet activation. In the first patient, although aspirin prevented both in vitro heparin-induced platelet aggregation (70% without and 7.5% with aspirin) and 14C serotonin release (48% without and 0% with aspirin), intraoperative administration of heparin resulted in an increase in plasma levels of platelet factor 4 from 8 to 260 ng/ml and beta-thromboglobulin levels from 29 to 39 ng/ml. In addition, the circulating platelet count decreased from 221,000 to 174,000 microliters, and 15% spontaneous platelet aggregation was observed. Fortunately, fibrinopeptide A levels remained less than 10 ng/ml intraoperatively, and no thrombotic complications occurred. In the second patient, aspirin did not prevent heparin-induced platelet aggregation in vitro (65% without and 41% with aspirin); however, iloprost (0.01 mumol/L) prevented both in vitro heparin-induced platelet aggregation (59.5% without and 0.0% with iloprost) and 14C serotonin release (56.7% without and 0.0% with iloprost). Therefore, a continuous infusion of iloprost was begun before administration of heparin and was continued until 20 minutes after reversal of heparin with protamine. After intraoperative administration of heparin, plasma levels of platelet factor 4 increased from 19 to 200 ng/ml, and beta-thromboglobulin levels increased from 56 to 76 ng/ml.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.