The development of new inhalation devices for asthma drugs raises the issue of the relationship between pulmonary deposition and therapeutic effect of inhaled drugs in patients with obstructive lung diseases. We thus conducted a randomized, double-blind and double-dummy, four-period crossover study in 13 patients with moderate asthma (mean age 36 yr; FEV1 59% of predicted), who inhaled 0.25 and 0.5 mg terbutaline sulphate on separate occasions either via a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) or Turbuhaler (TBH). Pulmonary deposition was 8.1 +/- 2.7% and 8.3 +/- 2.3%, respectively, of the nominal dose for pMDI and 19.0 +/- 7.3%, and 22.0 +/- 8.1% for TBH. The FEV1 increase after 0.25 mg terbutaline sulphate via TBH was significantly greater than after 0.25 mg via pMDI. No significant differences in FEV1 increase were observed between 0.25 mg via TBH, 0.5 mg via pMDI, or 0.5 mg via TBH. Other lung function variables showed similar dose- and device-related changes. We concluded that: (1) the dose of terbutaline sulphate deposited in the lungs is dependent on which inhalation system is used; (2) TBH delivers about twice the amount of drug to the lungs as the pMDI; and (3) the observed difference in deposition is reflected in the bronchodilating effect.

The steady state concentrations of glibenclamide in serum were measured radioimmunologically in 37 diabetic patients after administration for at least a year. No other antidiabetic drugs had been given. The interindividual variation in glibenclamide concentrations was extremely large (0 to 1520 nmol/l), greatly exceeding the variation in dosage (2.5--25 mg daily). There was no relation between dose and serum concentration of glibenclamide. Only four (9%) patients had fasting blood glucose concentrations below 5.5 mmol/l, and fewer than half had values below 8 mmol/l. In most cases, therefore, the therapy was inadequate. Single-dose kinetics of glibenclamide was assessed in healthy volunteers. Food intake did not influence the bioavailability of a 5 mg dose of glibenclamide. There was no insulin increase in response to glibenclamide unless a meal was also given, and this increase was not significant until 1 h after administration of drug and meal, when the mean serum concentration of glibenclamide had reached 100 nmol/l. Even in the fasting state, however, there was a progressive fall in blood glucose after glibenclamide administration, significant within 45 min and with a nadir at 2--2 1/2 h.

The data suggest that glyburide (and probably other sulfonylureas), operates within a narrow range of plasma concentrations (50-200 nM), which can be achieved with very low doses of the drug. It remains to be shown whether the threshold of maximal effect also in clinical practice is achieved with lower sulfonylurea doses than that currently used.

The aim of the study was to investigate the time of onset and the duration of the bronchodilating effect of different doses of formoterol administered via Turbuhaler in patients with moderate asthma. Thirty-one patients (five women) with a mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 1.97 +/- 0.54 1 and a mean reversibility of 31 +/- 14% of baseline were included in this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled and cross-over study. The patients inhaled single doses of placebo, i.e. 6, 12, 24, or 48 micrograms formoterol fumarate, on 5 separate days. Serial measurements of specific airways conductance (SGAW) and FEV1 were performed at regular time intervals for 12 h. The majority of the patients had at least a 50% increase in SGAW within 1-4 min after administration of all active treatments. The maximum increase in FEV1 over placebo was dose-dependent: 12% (6 micrograms), 18% (12 micrograms), 19% (24 micrograms), and 26% (48 micrograms) (P < 0.001). Twelve hours after administration of 6, 12, 24, and 48 micrograms formoterol, the mean increase in FEV1 was still 7%, 15%, 18%, and 27%, respectively, above the value following placebo. Headache was the most frequently reported adverse event in all treatments including placebo. After inhalation of 48 micrograms, three patients experienced mild tremor lasting for less than 1 h; likewise, one patient experienced the same event for 3 h after placebo. Formoterol administered via Turbuhaler10 gave a rapid and dose-related bronchodilating effect lasting for 12 h and was well tolerated.

Fifteen Type 2 diabetics were treated for 4-week periods with once daily (10 mg) glibenclamide, glipizide and placebo according to a double-blind cross-over protocol. Post-dose glipizide concentrations were three times higher than those of glibenclamide, due to the incomplete bioavailability of the latter. On the other hand, pre-dose drug levels were similar, as an expression of the slower absorption and/or elimination of glibenclamide. Both active treatments reduced postprandial blood glucose concentrations and 24-hour urinary glucose excretion to a similar degree, but fasting blood glucose concentrations were slightly lower during glibenclamide treatment. Both active treatments enhanced fasting and postprandial insulin and C-peptide concentrations, the C-peptide response being greater after glipizide than after glibenclamide. Plasma glucagon and GIP concentrations were not significantly affected. Insulin sensitivity was increased by glibenclamide but not by glipizide. Neither therapy affected insulin binding to erythrocytes. It appears that both glibenclamide and glipizide improved glucose metabolism by sustained stimulation of insulin secretion, which was most pronounced with glipizide. Only glibenclamide improved insulin sensitivity and was slightly more active than glipizide on fasting blood glucose levels. The differences may be consequences of the pharmacokinetics, but differences in pharmacodynamics cannot be excluded.

The pharmacokinetics of glipizide were studied in 6 type 2 diabetics following single dose intravenous administration of Img, and oral administration of 2.5 mg as a solution, a 2.5 mg tablet and a 5 mg tablet. The serum concentrations of the drug were measured by high pressure liquid chromatography. Glipizide showed a rapid distribution fitting a 2-compartment model. The distribution volume at assumed distribution equilibrium was small (10L), and the elimination half-life was short (2 to 4 hours). Gastrointestinal bioavailability was 100%. In one patient, glipizide absorption from tablets was retarded due to delayed tablet disintegration and drug dissolution. Each dose of glipizide reduced blood glucose levels rapidly in all patients.

The influence of food intake on the bioavailability of the beta-adrenoceptor blocker atenolol was assessed by measurement of its single-dose kinetics in ten healthy volunteers, who took 100 mg both in the fasting state and together with a standardized breakfast. Food intake significantly shortened the time to reach peak concentration (2.7 h vs 1.5 h), but caused a significant reduction in AUC values, the mean decrease being 20%. The elimination half-life was unaffected. Atenolol, which is relatively hydrophilic, is incompletely absorbed in the fasting state, and escapes first-pass metabolism. The present findings indicate that food intake causes further impairment of its absorption, even though the absorption rate may initially be enhanced. This contrasts with previous observations on the more lipophilic beta-adrenoceptor blockers propranolol and metoprolol.

Ten Type 2 diabetics were examined during long-term treatment, at two dosage levels, with chlorpropamide once daily and glipizide t.i.d. Drug concentrations were measured by gas chromatography and high-pressure liquid chromatography, respectively, plasma insulin (IRI) by radio-immunoassay, and blood glucose enzymatically. Both drugs gave continuous sulfonylurea exposure, even at the lower dosage, and the mean plasma concentrations were almost doubled after the increase in dose. Neither the IRI nor the glucose response to meals showed any therapeutic improvement following the increase in chlorpropamide dosage. The lower dosage of glipizide produced better glucose utilization than chlorpropamide. On the other hand, the increased dose of glipizide led to impairment instead of further improvement. As this was associated with enhanced rather than reduced IRI levels, the impairment might have been due to increased peripheral insulin resistance. Thus, glipizide offers a therapeutic advantage over chlorpropamide, but its effectiveness may be restricted not only by limitations set by the disease, but also by counter-regulatory mechanisms that develop during continuous exposure to sulfonylureas at high levels.