Land applications of manure from confined animal systems and direct deposit by grazing animals are both major sources of bacteria in streams. An understanding of the overland transport mechanisms from land applied waste is needed to improve design of best management practices (BMPs) and modeling of nonpoint source (NPS) pollution. Plots were established on pasturelands receiving phosphorus-based livestock waste applications to measure the concentrations of Escherichia coli (E. coli), fecal coliform (FC), and Enterococcus present in overland flow at the edge of the field. The flow-weighted bacteria concentrations were highest in runoff samples from the plots treated with cowpies (1.37 × 10 5 colony forming units (cfu)/100 ml of E. coli) followed by liquid dairy manure (1.84 × 10 4 cfu/100 ml of E. coli) and turkey litter (1.29 × 10 4 cfu/100 ml of E. coli). The temporal distribution of fecal bacterial concentrations appeared to be dependent upon both the animal waste treatment and the indicator species, with peak concentrations occurring either at the beginning of the runoff event or during peak flow rates. BMPs could be selected to reduce peak flows or first flush effects depending upon the litter or manure applied to the land. The commercial Biolog System was used to identify the dominant species of Enterococcus present in the cowpie source manure (Enterococcus mundtii 55%) and in the runoff collected from the transport plots treated with cowpies (Enterococcus faecalis 37%). The identification of predominant species of Enterococcus that are associated with specific sources of fecal pollution could greatly assist with identifying the origins of NPS pollution.

Land applications of manure from confined animal systems and direct deposit by grazing animals are both major sources of nutrients in streams. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of P-based manure applications on total suspended solids (TSS) and nutrient losses from dairy manures and poultry litter surface applied to pasturelands and to compare the nutrient losses transported to the edge of the field during overland flow events. Two sets of plots were established: one set for the study of in-field release and another set for the study of edge-of-the-field nutrient transport. Release plots were constructed at three pastureland sites (previous poultry litter applications, previous liquid dairy manure application, and no prior manure application) and received four manure treatments (turkey [Meleagris gallopavo] litter, liquid dairy manure, standard cowpies, and none). Pasture plots with a history of previous manure applications released higher concentrations of TSS and higher percentages of total P (TP) in the particulate form. Transport plots were developed on pasture with no prior manure application. The average flow-weighted TP concentrations were highest in runoff samples from the plots treated with cowpies (1.57 mg L(-1)). Reducing excess P in dairy cow diets and surface applying manure to the land using P-based management practices did not increase N concentrations in runoff. This study found that nutrients are most transportable from cowpies; thus a buffer zone between pastureland and streams or other appropriate management practices are necessary to reduce nutrient losses to waterbodies.

No abstract

While excessive sediment is a leading cause of aquatic life use impairments in free-flowing rivers in Virginia, there is no numeric sediment-water quality criterion. As a result, total maximum daily load (TMDL) sediment loads are often established using a comparable, nonimpaired reference watershed. Selecting a suitable reference watershed can be problematic. This case study compared the reference watershed approach (RWA) which uses the Generalized Watershed Loading Function and the disaggregate method (DM) which uses output from Phase 5.3 of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model. In this case study, the two methods were used to develop sediment TMDLs for three impaired watersheds in Virginia (Taylor Creek, Turley Creek, and Long Meadow Run). In this case study comparison, the RWA required between 12.8 and 14.7 times greater sediment load reductions (t=year) to reach the TMDL load (Taylor Creek > Long Meadow Run > Turley Creek) when compared to the reductions called for using the DM. While each TMDL development method has inherent limitations, the DM uses output from the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model to establish TMDL target loads. This means that the application of the DM is restricted to the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.

Re-mining of abandoned mined lands (AML) by active operations provides opportunities to reclaim these lands so as to eliminate environmental problems created by previous mining. Generally, if remaining coal reserves are sufficient to justify re-mining at a given AML site, a number of alternative re-mining strategies will be available. This project compared the potential environmental effects of alternative re-mining and reclamation strategies at a case study AML site in Dickenson County, Virginia. Estimates of reduction in soil loss and sediment yield likely to be achieved by various re-mining and reclamation strategies, relative to current conditions, were utilized as indicators of environmental improvement. The results of computer modeling procedures and on-site observations indicate that there are substantial differences among the environmental effects of available re-mining and reclamation strategies. Those strategies which reclaim outslope spoils are the most effective, from an environmental improvement standpoint. However, in the current regulatory environment, the most likely re-mining strategies would reclaim bench and highwall areas, but not outslopes. While such strategies do result in some environmental improvement, they also degrade the ability of remaining coal reserves to sustain future reclamation that will eliminate remaining environmental liabilities.