On the basis of our results, we propose that, in patients with APTM, sensory symptoms, oligoclonal bands and brain MRI are predictive factors for subsequent conversion to clinically definite MS and that within the latter patients the number of spinal cord lesions on MRI is the only predictive factor for a poor outcome.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) with clinical onset after 50 years of age is unusual (between 1 and 6%) and is frequently misdiagnosed. Furthermore, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities are frequently observed in subjects over 50 years of age. The aim of this study was to describe brain MRI in late-onset MS to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of radiological MS criteria in patients aged over 50 years. We evaluated the brain MRI of 20 patients with onset of MS after 50 years of age. We compared these MRI with 26 controls matched for age, sex and vascular risk factors. MRI were blindly analysed by two neuroradiologists according to Paty et al.'s [Neurology38 (1988) 180] criteria, Fazekas et al.'s [Neurology38 (1988) 1822] criteria and Barkhof et al.'s [Brain120 (1997) 2059] criteria. The mean age at MRI scanning was 58 years. Sensitivity was 90% for Paty et al.'s criteria, 80% for Fazekas et al.'s criteria and 85% for Barkhof et al.'s criteria. Specificity was 54% for Paty et al.'s criteria, 69% for Fazekas et al.'s criteria and 65% for Barkhof et al.'s criteria. Barkhof et al.'s criteria are less specific in older patients than in young patients. We suggest that spinal cord MRI and cerebrospinal fluid analysis should be systematically performed in suspected late-onset MS in order to increase the specificity of the diagnosis.
Although DWI is the most sensitive technique with which to detect acute stroke, FLAIR imaging may also be useful to demonstrate both acute ischemia and arterial occlusion with an excellent interobserver reproducibility.
To determine the safety of a combination of mycophenolate mofetil (Cellcept, MMF) and IFNbeta-1a (Avonex) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and to evaluate the effects of the combination on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of disease activity. Secondary objectives were clinical and MRI data. An open-label, single-centre study including 30 RRMS patients was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score <6.0, treated by Avonex for at least 6 months, with at least two relapses during the previous 2 years and at least one during the previous 6 months. MMF at a progressive dose of 2 g per day orally was added to Avonex for a duration of 6 months. MRI data were obtained at baseline and at the end of the study. The pre-study annual relapse rate was 2.0 +/- 0.7 and the EDSS score at baseline was 2.9 +/- 1.3. Eleven patients had gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced lesions at baseline for a total number of 35 lesions. Two patients interrupted the combination, one after the first dose for personal reasons unrelated to the study and the other due to diarrhoea. A few of the patients also reported nausea and abdominal pains. Adverse events included benign infectious diseases, insomnia and dizziness. No significant biological abnormalities were noted. The annualized relapse rate was 0.57 +/- 0.3 at the end of the study (P < 0.001). The mean EDSS score was 2.6 +/- 1.5 and no Gd-enhanced lesions were detected on MRI at the end of the study. MMF and IFNbeta-1a (Avonex) combined therapy is safe and very well-tolerated. Clinical and MRI data suggest that this combination may be beneficial.
The results suggest that plasma level of D-dimer can give an additional contribution for the evaluation of the severity of CAP and its complications in children.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.