Objective• To evaluate imaging methods and prognoses between small renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and larger tumours according to the era of diagnostics.
Patients and Methods• In all, 784 consecutive patients diagnosed with RCC between 1964 and 1997 at the Pirkanmaa Hospital District in Finland were included. • Patients were divided into two groups: tumours of ≤3.0 and >3.0 cm in diameter.• Prognosis was analysed according to the era of diagnostics:(i) pre-computed tomography (CT) and pre-ultrasound (US), (ii) US era and (iii) CT era.
Results• Small tumours became more common: in the pre-CT and pre-US era, only 4.4% of tumours were small; however, in the CT era 16% were small tumours.• More diagnostic methods were used in studying small tumours.• CT proved to be the most reliable method, although it was actually better at diagnosing large tumours.• Relapses occurred less frequently among patients with small tumours; more than half of the tumours that developed distant metastases (16.0%) already evinced them at the time of diagnosis. There were no relapses after 14 years of follow-up among small tumours, whereas large tumours relapsed within that time. RCC was the cause of death in 14.9% of patients with small tumours vs 50.7% with large tumours.• The best prognosis was among patients with small tumours diagnosed with CT.
Conclusion• Among patients with small tumours, prognosis has improved along with better diagnostics, although some showed relapse during a surveillance period of up to 14 years.
The most important explanatory factors were stage, age and clinical presentation of the tumour. RCC patients showed diminishing overall survival in the follow-up, with no plateau; almost 57% of patients developed local recurrence or distant metastases even after a very long disease-free interval.
In connection with osteosynthesis carried out on the tibias of rats we compared acrylic and bis-GMA plastics (CMW and Silar) and acrylic emulsion and acrylic dispersion used as intermediary material. A total of 80 rats of both sexes were used. The rats were divided into four groups, in which different intermediary material combinations were tested. The observation times were 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Macroscopical, radiological, histological, oxytetracycline fluorescence, and scanning electron-microscopical studies were done. Histologically, the Silar proved to be the more reliable fixation material and acrylic dispersion the better intermediary material. Furthermore, the radiological results were better (P less than 0.05) when acrylic dispersion was used as the intermediary material and Silar as the plastic.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.