Physician advocacy and leadership is increasingly recognized as an important part of our social responsibility. Frameworks, such as CanMEDS, have set out definitions of health advocacy and leadership for medical education. Despite calls for mandatory advocacy and leadership teaching and potential wellness benefits, presently medical curricula do not usually teach practical advocacy and leadership skills to learners. There is also a demonstrated disconnect between staff and resident perceptions of advocacy. Our group set out to create an innovative Advocacy and Leadership Curriculum (ALC) to fill this gap. A collaboration of over twenty medical students and professors from across Canada and the U.S worked over the past year to survey students, conduct curriculum mapping, Page | 2 examine current literature and practices in order to inform the creation of an ALC. A competency-and milestonebased ALC was created based on this data and reviewed by experts in medical education and/or physician advocacy. This ALC addresses three spheres of advocacy: the Patient level, the Institutional level, and the Population level (which includes the Community). A guiding principle of the ALC is to form positive working partnerships with communities and patients and to collaborate with other health professionals to advocate with, and on behalf of, patients. CanMEDS-based Learning Objectives, divided into theoretical, skills-based, and application-based categories, form the core of the program. The curriculum prepares learners for real-world advocacy through longitudinal projects, interdisciplinary work, and community-based service learning. Novel engagement of other professionals and physician advocates to act as advocacy preceptors is central to the curriculum. Innovative assessment techniques-such as advocacy simulations, longitudinal study of physician advocacy activity, and focus on attitudes and behaviour as well as knowledge and practical advocacy skills-are introduced. The ALC serves as an adaptable model for the training of socially responsible medical learners who are conversant in advocacy techniques and able to advocate with patients, within institutions, and with populations. Projects resulting from the ALC will improve medical school social accountability.
for those relating to issues discussed recently (within six weeks) in the BMJ. * We do not routinely acknowledge letters. Please send a stamped addressed envelope ifyou would like an acknowledgment. * Because we receive many more letters than we can publish we may shorten those we do print, particularly when we receive several on the same subject.
The problems encountered with a glass slide circulation are legion but timely circulation is a major problem and is an inherent deficiency of our Non‐gynaecological EQA scheme. This applies not only to consultants but also to specialist registrars (SpRs) and technical staff that are not formally included in the circulation list. In 2005 only 7 technical staff and 4 out of 47 SpRs took part on a formal basis, their participation being dependant on access to slides during their cytology attachment. The results for the 2005 circulation have been analysed and despite the small numbers of participating technical staff and SpRs their answers concur with the consultant body. To address the issues of timeliness and circulation problems a pilot teaching set has been developed by SlidePath into a virtual microscope web based circulation and sent to all SpRs in our region. They have recorded their answers and been given immediate access to the consensus consultant opinion with illustrations of follow up histology. A questionnaire was completed to evaluate the scheme. The facility of immediate feedback of consultant consensus is particularly pertinent to the educational element of the scheme and use of virtual microscopy addresses the issue of timely circulation. If further funding was made available technical staff could also be given the opportunity to try this web‐based circulation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.