P‐15
comparison of Results for a Non‐gynaecological Cytology Eqa Scheme

Abstract

The problems encountered with a glass slide circulation are legion but timely circulation is a major problem and is an inherent deficiency of our Non‐gynaecological EQA scheme. This applies not only to consultants but also to specialist registrars (SpRs) and technical staff that are not formally included in the circulation list. In 2005 only 7 technical staff and 4 out of 47 SpRs took part on a formal basis, their participation being dependant on access to slides during their cytology attachment. The results for the 2005 circulation have been analysed and despite the small numbers of participating technical staff and SpRs their answers concur with the consultant body. To address the issues of timeliness and circulation problems a pilot teaching set has been developed by SlidePath into a virtual microscope web based circulation and sent to all SpRs in our region. They have recorded their answers and been given immediate access to the consensus consultant opinion with illustrations of follow up histology. A questionnaire was completed to evaluate the scheme. The facility of immediate feedback of consultant consensus is particularly pertinent to the educational element of the scheme and use of virtual microscopy addresses the issue of timely circulation. If further funding was made available technical staff could also be given the opportunity to try this web‐based circulation.