Binding patterns of mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to P1, Pk, N, I, H, Y or A antigens were visualized in the backscatter electron imaging mode of a scanning electron microscope by indirect immunogold labelling. Experiments were performed at room temperature (RT) and at 4 degrees C. In experiments with anti-P1 and anti-Pk, clusters of immunolabelling particles dominated the immunolabelling pattern much more at RT than at 4 degrees C. By contrast, no clustering was seen with anti-N, even at RT. Clustering was also observed at RT with anti-I, anti-H and anti-Y, and on some Ax and A3 cells with anti-A, but was much reduced at 4 degrees C. Immunolabelling was stronger at 4 degrees C than at RT with all mAb except anti-N and anti-A. The results indicate that glycolipid blood group antigens are more mobile in the membrane of intact erythrocytes at RT than at 4 degrees C, and that the cells bind more antibodies to such antigens at 4 degrees C than at RT. We suggest that antigen immobilization in the cold will reduce cross-linking of antigens and hence increase the number of antibody molecules needed for epitope saturation, leading to increased binding of antibody in the cold. This may be the main reason for cold-enhanced agglutination with human blood group antibodies.

This report presents binding patterns on A1, A2, A3, Ax and Ae1 erythrocytes of a monoclonal anti‐A (A 003) antibody which reacts predominantly with difucosylated A oligosacccharides, visualized with colloidal gold particles in the backscattered electron imaging mode of a scanning electron microscope. A relatively weak labelling was found on most A, cells, while the labelling in subgroups A2, A3 and especially Ax appeared relatively stronger. Very few Ae1 cells were labelled. The results emphasize the qualitative uniqueness of A1 and suggest that many Ax cells have high proportions of difucosylated A oligosaccharides. Labelling variations were found between different A3 and Ax traits, and in all subgroups between cells and even between different parts of the cells. No immunolabelling differences were found in relation to secretor status.

No abstract