Sentence of juvenile imprisonment is analyzed in its theoretical aspect and then in the aspect of legislative regulation in positive criminal legislation. Taking into consideration the content and legal nature, in practice this subject is mainly defined through criminal law in its material aspect, with certain explanation of those questions that are related to procedural and executive law to that level which the subject of investigation allows. In the perspective of criminal law, the legal terms in both national and comparative juvenile legislation are analyzed, in order to determine the complete sense and justification of the punishment. The analysis is done through interrelations of juvenile imprisonment sentence and certain institutes of criminal law, then relevant theoretical and practical concepts and discussions. Normative aspect aims to better explain the content and function of this punishment based on certain legal modification both in national and in comparative law, especially in European criminal legislation. Criminal justice analysis of the terms of juvenile court, contributes to clear differentiation from other criminal sanctions, above all, corrective measures, with special effect on its practical use. The investigation made in regards to the content, conditions of passing and justification of juvenile imprisonment sentence provides certain knowledge of its efficacy and justification in the system of criminal sanctions. The necessity of studying general and specific circumstances for its imposing contributes to more complete approach to the discussions both in the theory and court practice. Allowing the possibility that the sentence of juvenile imprisonment is only imposed on senior juveniles, simultaneously leads us to think that a special attention will be paid to two groups of circumstances: level of maturity and necessary time for both behavioral and professional education of the juvenile. In parallel to this aspect, some other questions appearing both in theoretical and practical aspect of this serious and only punishment have been discussed.
Са аспетка савремене криминалне политике, суштина примене криминалнополитичких принципа своди се на спровођење успешних превентивних програма, који у првом реду зависе од испољавања субјективних и објективних фактора личности малолетника. С обзиром на то да су поједини принципи засновани на идеји превентивног деловања и да је кажњавање малолетника последње средство у сузбијању друштвено опасних понашања, стога је поштовање начела највише изражено у заштитној и гарантивној функцији кривичног права. С тим у вези, различити начини реаговања друштвене заједнице на понашање малолетних лица уједно указују да савремена кривичнополитичка кретања све више налазе своје место у примени алтернативних кривичних санкција и мера. Тиме се, уместо вођења класичног кривичног поступка приступа различитим облицима друштвеног реаговања у смислу решавања и отклањања негативних последица проузрокваних од стране малолетника. У савременој теорији кривичног права, углавном се издвајају два основна модела: заштитнички (welfare) и правосудни модел (justice), док се модел ресторативне правде и неокорекционализма појављују као подврста претходна два модела, која су међусобно супротстављена многобројним нормативним решењима. Тако је посебним законом ЗОМУКД регулисано да се кривичноправни положај малолетних лица односи у првом реду на примену тзв. парапеналних мера односно мера диверзионог карактера уз поштовање основних
Statutory limitation is the base that leads to the expiration of a criminal sanction after a certain period of time. Since the statute of limitation is determined by the state through legal regulations, it means that in the end it represents a complete waiver of the state's right to punish due to the passage of time. Statute of limitation is given to a public, general social interest. When it comes to criminal sanctions against minors, then we say that educational measures do not become obsolete due to the expiration of a certain period of time from the finality of the decision on their imposition, which corresponds to the nature, character, content and purpose of this type of criminal sanctions. Then the following institutes are applied: a) suspension of execution and replacement of the imposed educational measure with another educational measure (Article 24 of the ZOMUKD) and b) re-decision on educational measures (Article 25 of the ZOMUKD). When it comes to an older juvenile who has been sentenced to juvenile imprisonment for a serious crime, the statute of limitation for the execution of that sentence is defined in the Article 33 of the ZOMUKD.
** Овај рад је резултат реализовања научноистраживачког пројекта кога финансира Министарство просвете, науке и технолошког развоја Републике Србије (бр. 179045). ** Рад је био изложен у виду усменог саопштења на Међународној научној конференцији "Право и мултидисциплинарност" одржаној на Правном факултету Универзитета у Нишу 12. и 13. априла 2019.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.