Purpose-The intent of this article is to illustrate outcomes and results of a collection analysis done by a smaller academic library. Design/methodology/approach-The collection was evaluated using an online analysis tool combined with a physical inventory of the collection. Findings-Peer group comparisons revealed some of the problems with this particular collection were also widespread among the comparison libraries. The value of the e-book collection to patrons was clear: not only did e-books provide resources to remote students; they help compensate for shortfalls in the print collection. Practical implications-The catalog more accurately reflects what is on the shelf and also what is reported to OCLC. Access to the collection has been improved and enhanced. Steps were taken to refocus the library's collection development procedures and management. The changes made have led to increased faculty involvement in selection and a more balanced, more comprehensive collection management plan. Originality/value-For any library considering whether they can or should do an analysis, the article illustrates that the benefits are well worth the time and expense. The analysis had a positive impact on collection development and management.
Seventy-nine military medical beneficiaries infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV+) and 27 HIV-seronegative control subjects (HIV-) completed a neuropsychological evaluation and a semistructured interview inquiring about difficulties in function. More HIV+ than HIV- subjects reported difficulties. HIV+ subjects reporting difficulties were significantly more likely to be deficient on attention, response speed, motor function, and memory than those not reporting difficulties. Findings for early-stage HIV+ subjects were similar. HIV+ individuals who complained of difficulties reported depression and anxiety symptoms significantly more frequently than those who did not complain, but these symptoms were not related to neuropsychological performance. Complaints of difficulties by HIV+ individuals may reflect either actual neuropsychological deficiency or mood disturbance, but the effects of each appear to be independent.
A study of 343 Active members and Fellows of the American Academy of Neurology revealed that among 285 responders who spent over 10 hours per week in direct patient care, 198 were in private practice, 69 worked exclusively for institutions, and 18 worked part time in each setting. Eighty-three (29%) used extenders in their practice. Institutionally based neurologists were significantly more likely to use extenders than those in private practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.