Collection analysis outcomes in an academic library

Abstract

Purpose-The intent of this article is to illustrate outcomes and results of a collection analysis done by a smaller academic library. Design/methodology/approach-The collection was evaluated using an online analysis tool combined with a physical inventory of the collection. Findings-Peer group comparisons revealed some of the problems with this particular collection were also widespread among the comparison libraries. The value of the e-book collection to patrons was clear: not only did e-books provide resources to remote students; they help compensate for shortfalls in the print collection. Practical implications-The catalog more accurately reflects what is on the shelf and also what is reported to OCLC. Access to the collection has been improved and enhanced. Steps were taken to refocus the library's collection development procedures and management. The changes made have led to increased faculty involvement in selection and a more balanced, more comprehensive collection management plan. Originality/value-For any library considering whether they can or should do an analysis, the article illustrates that the benefits are well worth the time and expense. The analysis had a positive impact on collection development and management.

Are Print Books Dead? An Investigation of Book Circulation at a Mid-Sized Academic Library

“…A number of studies report using the WCA to evaluate their own library collections and/or compare local holdings with peer or aspirant libraries (e.g. Beals & Gilmour, 2007;Neubert & Brewer, 2007;Henry et al 2008;Culbertson & Wilde, 2009;McClure, 2009;Monroe-Gulick & Currie, 2011). Davis et al (2008) used the WCA interlibrary loan module to inform strategic collection development at North Carolina State University, and Way's (2009) use of the WCA interlibrary loan data prompted a decision to develop a patron-initiated purchase program at Grand Valley State University.…”

“…However, we hope that e-books will complement our print book collection, offer our users a much wider selection of titles, and possibly increase the use of print books as reported by Henry et al 2008.…”

SLIS Connecting, Volume 5, Issue 1

“…The data were then compared with the collections of peer librarians. Findings revealed the strengths, weaknesses, and imbalances in the collection, including aging, unbalanced, and inadequate print collections in some areas (Henry, Longstaff, & Van Kampen, 2008). Similarly, the current study used circulation statistics to identify strengths and weaknesses of the collections held at OYDC.…”

Assessing University Library Print Book Collections and Deselection: A Case Study at The National University of Ireland Maynooth

“…• Engaging the services of external agencies such as OCLC's WorldCat Collection Analysis (Henry et al 2008;OCLC) or Sustainable Collection Services (Lugg, et all, 2011-), while considered unsuitable at the time, might be interesting to test for effectiveness and compare with the in-house approach.…”